Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 181 - 200 of 5225
BELARUS: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
BELARUS: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS E/C.12/BLR/CO/4 6 NULL 2013 12 12T00:00:00 CESCR United Nations E/C.12/BLR/CO/4 6 Economic and Social Council Distr.: General 13 December 2013 Original: English Committee on Economic Social and Cultural Rights Concluding UHRIE/C.12/BLR/CO/4-6https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/92696eeb-1674-49e1-befc-fa63611f61d8
BELASIN v. Romania
BELASIN v. Romania ROU 15/02/2008 00:00:00 06/11/2016 16:19:47 Case Description: Breach of legal certainty and interference with property rights: Annulment of favourable final court decisions following appeals by the Prosecutor General in disputes EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17538
BENEDIK v. Slovenia
BENEDIK v. Slovenia SVN 24/07/2018 00:00:00 23/10/2018 17:25:37 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Arbitrary interference by the police on the basis of a law lacking clarity and sufficient safeguards to obtain and use without a court EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50585
BENIN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
BENIN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CAT/C/BEN/CO/3 NULL 2019 06 04T00:00:00 CAT United Nations CAT/C/BEN/CO/3 Convention against Torture Distr.: General 4 June 2019 and Other Cruel Inhuman English or Degrading Treatment Original: French or Punishment Committee UHRICAT/C/BEN/CO/3https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/1e695a9f-c808-444b-bdbe-3ae8b3659b80
BENZAN v. Croatia
BENZAN v. Croatia HRV 08/11/2002 00:00:00 03/11/2016 16:22:41 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment / prison conditions / protection of correspondence: Poor prison conditions in Lepoglava Prison and disproportionate interference with the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12163
BERECOVA v. Slovakia
BERECOVA v. Slovakia SVK 24/07/2007 00:00:00 02/11/2016 13:55:44 Case Description: Protection of family life: Unlawful interference due to the placement of the applicant s children in an institution on the basis of administrative injunctions whilst the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-8023
BERGENS TIDENDE & OTHERS v. Norway
BERGENS TIDENDE OTHERS v. Norway NOR 02/08/2000 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference on account of the applicant newspaper and its two editors being convicted in civil defamation proceedings EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-177
BERZINS AND OTHERS v. Latvia
BERZINS AND OTHERS v. Latvia LVA 21/12/2021 00:00:00 10/01/2022 09:21:48 Case Description: The present case concerns an interference with the applicants right to the peaceful enjoyment of their possessions as they have been unable to use or access their EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59297
BEYELER v. Italy
BEYELER v. Italy ITA 05/01/2000 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:46:44 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference on account of the conditions under which the state exercised its pre emptive right to a painting by Van Gogh 11 years EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-42743
BEZRUKOVY v. Russia
BEZRUKOVY v. Russia RUS 10/08/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases concerns unjustified extension of an expired time limit to appeal in civil proceedings to which the applicants were a party and the subsequent quashing EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13691
BIGAEVA v. Greece
BIGAEVA v. Greece GRC 28/08/2009 00:00:00 07/11/2016 09:36:22 Case Description: Protection of professional life: Interference due to the rejection on the ground of nationality at the final stage of the admission procedure after completion of compulsory EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-22656
BIL INSAAT TAAHHUT TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI v. Turkey
BIL INSAAT TAAHHUT TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI v. Turkey TUR 01/01/2014 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:45:20 Case Description: Protection of property: Unlawful interference due to the demolition of the applicant company s construction work on an expropriated site EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37158
BILEN AND CORUK v. Turkey
BILEN AND CORUK v. Turkey TUR 08/06/2016 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:29:41 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and freedom of expression: Lack of a public hearing in criminal proceedings as well as unlawful interference due to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37098
BILGEN v. Turkey
BILGEN v. Turkey TUR 09/06/2021 00:00:00 24/06/2021 17:58:49 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the absence of sufficient procedural guarantees including a judicial review mechanism in the proceedings before the Council of Judges and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57913
BIMER S.A. v. the Republic of Moldova
BIMER S.A. v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 10/10/2007 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: Protection of property rights: Unlawful interference by a Customs Department order closing the applicant company duty free business located inside the Leu EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6778
BIRZIETIS v. Lithuania
BIRZIETIS v. Lithuania LTU 14/09/2016 00:00:00 07/11/2016 17:11:49 Case Description: Protection of private life: Unjustified interference due to the authorities refusal to allow a detainee to grow a beard while he was serving a prison sentence due to an EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-26454
BITTO AND OTHERS v. Slovakia
BITTO AND OTHERS v. Slovakia SVK 28/04/2014 00:00:00 02/11/2016 13:46:05 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to unjust limitations on the use of property by landlords in particular through the rent control scheme. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7709
BJEDOV v. Croatia
BJEDOV v. Croatia HRV 29/08/2012 00:00:00 03/11/2016 15:28:29 Case Description: Protection of private life and home: Disproportionate interference on account of the domestic courts decisions ordering the applicants to leave State owned flats failing EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12035
BJORK EIDSDOTTIR v. Iceland
BJORK EIDSDOTTIR v. Iceland ISL 10/10/2012 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:27:37 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to convictions of the applicant journalists in civil defamation proceedings brought against them on the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-71
BLADET TROMSO AND STENSAAS v. Norway
BLADET TROMSO AND STENSAAS v. Norway NOR 20/05/1999 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference on account of the applicant newspaper company and its editor being convicted in civil defamation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-173