Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 7581 - 7600 of 7918
T.D.J. v. Denmark
T.D.J. v. Denmark CCPR/C/127/D/2654/2015 Communication number s : 2654/2015 Author: T.D.J. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 127 Country Denmark Submission date 05 Oct 2015 Date of decision 08 Nov 2019 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/127/D/2654/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2813/en-US
T.P. AND K.M. v. the United Kingdom
T.P. AND K.M. v. the United Kingdom GBR 10/05/2001 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of family life: Disproportionate interference due to the failure of the local authority to ensure adequate involvement of a mother in the decision EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2484
T.P.F. v. Peru
T.P.F. v. Peru CEDAW/C/50/D/22/2009 Communication number s : 022/2009 Author: T.P.F. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 50 Country Peru Submission date 18 Jun 2009 Date of decision 17 Oct 2011 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/50/D/22/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1704/en-US
TADEVOSYAN v. Armenia
TADEVOSYAN v. Armenia ARM 16/05/2019 00:00:00 28/05/2019 14:50:56 Case Description: Protection of property: Interference without public interest due to the domestic courts decision on the non restitution of the applicant s property monetary assets EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52070
TAJIKISTAN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
TAJIKISTAN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS E/C.12/TJK/CO/4 NULL 2022 11 10T00:00:00 CESCR United Nations E/C.12/TJK/CO/4 Economic and Social Council Distr.: General 10 November 2022 Original: English Committee on Economic Social and Cultural Rights Concluding UHRIE/C.12/TJK/CO/4https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/c3956e93-c025-4ec1-aa62-7bfe84e32ef3
TAJIKISTAN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
TAJIKISTAN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CCPR/C/TJK/CO/3 NULL 2019 08 22T00:00:00 CCPR United Nations CCPR/C/TJK/CO/3 International Covenant on Distr.: General 22 August 2019 Civil and Political Rights Original: English Human Rights Committee Concluding UHRICCPR/C/TJK/CO/3https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/722f6192-8f4b-40f4-887f-806ca882cedd
TAJIKISTAN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
TAJIKISTAN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CMW/C/TJK/CO/2 NULL 2019 05 09T00:00:00 CMW United Nations CMW/C/TJK/CO/2 International Convention on the Distr.: General 9 May 2019 Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Original: English Members of Their UHRICMW/C/TJK/CO/2https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/7a20a75d-f70c-43c9-ae7c-43dfffe56dec
TALU v. Turkey
TALU v. Turkey TUR 27/11/2018 00:00:00 30/11/2018 18:05:49 Case Description: Freedom of expression / access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unjustified and disproportionate interference due to convictions in civil defamation proceedings as well EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50857
TAMER v. Turkey
TAMER v. Turkey TUR 05/03/2007 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:16:29 Case Description: Protection of private and family life and functioning of justice: Unjustified interference by prison authorities with prisoners correspondence with their lawyer unfairness of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37380
TANASOAICA v. Romania
TANASOAICA v. Romania ROU 19/09/2012 00:00:00 06/11/2016 16:19:47 Case Description: Unlawful interference with freedom of expression: Criminal conviction under legislation in force at that date for having published articles criticising a public figure for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17518
TANASOV v. Romania
TANASOV v. Romania ROU 31/10/2017 00:00:00 12/10/2018 15:40:34 Case Description: This case concerns a disproportionate interference with the applicant s right to the peaceful enjoyment of his possessions on account of the confiscation of two silver ingots EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48093
TARANEKS v. Latvia
TARANEKS v. Latvia LVA 02/03/2015 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:30:55 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice protection of private life: Unfair criminal proceedings due to the domestic court s failure to properly address the incitement EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12660
TARSASAG A SZABADSAGJOGOKERT v. Hungary
TARSASAG A SZABADSAGJOGOKERT v. Hungary HUN 14/07/2009 00:00:00 03/11/2016 08:47:27 Case Description: Freedom to receive information: Interference with the applicant association s freedom of information a non governmental organisation active in the field EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-11336
TAS v. Turkey
TAS v. Turkey TUR 19/03/2007 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:21:37 Case Description: Freedom of expression and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unjustified interference with freedom of expression on account of convictions under former Article 8 of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-30670
TASEV v. North Macedonia
TASEV v. North Macedonia MKD 16/08/2019 00:00:00 26/08/2019 11:34:26 Case Description: Protection of private life: Unforeseeable interference due to the authorities refusal in 2012 to grant the applicant s request to have his ethnicity entry in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52659
TATAR AND FABER v. Hungary
TATAR AND FABER v. Hungary HUN 12/09/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to the imposition of an administrative sanction for hanging dirty laundry outside Parliament as a brief EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-11086
TELE 1 PRIVATFERNSEH v. Austria
TELE 1 PRIVATFERNSEH v. Austria AUT 19/01/2001 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to the refusal to allow the applicant company to set up and operate a television transmitter. Article 10 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-843
TEMUR ONEL v. Turkey
TEMUR ONEL v. Turkey TUR 23/08/2002 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:10:46 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to the administration s delay in paying additional compensation awarded by the domestic courts for the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28609
TENDAM v. Spain
TENDAM v. Spain ESP 13/10/2010 00:00:00 02/11/2016 09:41:36 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of property: Infringement of the presumption of innocence resulting in refusal to award compensation for pre trial EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5736
TERNOVSZKY v. Hungary
TERNOVSZKY v. Hungary HUN 14/03/2011 00:00:00 03/11/2016 08:47:27 Case Description: Protection of family life: Lack of regulation of home birth resulted in a situation incompatible with the notion of foreseeability and lawfulness. Therefore the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-11570