Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 7781 - 7800 of 7918
VUKOVIC v. Croatia
VUKOVIC v. Croatia HRV 15/11/2018 00:00:00 22/11/2018 10:36:08 Case Description: Protection of property rights: Disproportionate interference due to the seizure of the applicant s vehicle in the context of a criminal investigation and its prolonged EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50825
Vakoumé et al. v. France
Vakoum et al. v. France CCPR/C/70/D/822/1998 Communication number s : 822/1998 Author: Mathieu Vakoum and 28 other persons Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 70 Country France Submission date 11 Mar 1998 Date of decision 31 Oct 2000 JUTBCCPR/C/70/D/822/1998https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/910/en-US
Van Hulst v. Netherlands
Van Hulst v. Netherlands CCPR/C/82/D/903/2000 Communication number s : 903/2000 Author: Antonius Cornelis Van Hulst Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 82 Country Netherlands Submission date 08 Apr 1998 Date of decision 01 Nov 2004 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/82/D/903/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1146/en-US
Vasily Poliakov v. Belarus
Vasily Poliakov v. Belarus CCPR/C/111/D/2030/2011 Communication number s : 2030/2011 Author: Vasily Poliakov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 111 Country Belarus Submission date 28 Jan 2010 Date of decision 17 Jul 2014 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/111/D/2030/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1862/en-US
Velichkin v. Belarus
Velichkin v. Belarus CCPR/C/85/D/1022/2001 Communication number s : 1022/2001 Author: Vladimir Velichkin Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 85 Country Belarus Submission date 09 May 2001 Date of decision 20 Oct 2005 Comment: The text of an JUTBCCPR/C/85/D/1022/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/988/en-US
Viktor Leven v. Kazakhstan
Viktor Leven v. Kazakhstan CCPR/C/112/D/2131/2012 Communication number s : 2131/2012 Author: Viktor Leven represented by counsel Anastasia Miller Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 112 Country Kazakhstan Submission date 19 Jan 2012 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/2131/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1933/en-US
Viktor Sazonov v. Belarus
Viktor Sazonov v. Belarus CCPR/C/132/D/2397/2014 Communication number s : 2397/2014 Author: Viktor Sazonov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 132 Country Belarus Submission date 10 Feb 2014 Date of decision 23 Jul 2021 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/132/D/2397/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3179/en-US
Vitaly Symonik v. Belarus
Vitaly Symonik v. Belarus CCPR/C/112/D/1952/2010 Communication number s : 1952/2010 Author: Vitaly Symonik represented by counsel Roman Kisliak Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 112 Country Belarus Submission date 26 Dec 2008 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/1952/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1887/en-US
Vojnovic v. Croatia
Vojnovic v. Croatia CCPR/C/95/D/1510/2006 Communication number s : 1510/2006 Author: Dusan Vojnovic Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 95 Country Croatia Submission date 23 Jan 2006 Date of decision 30 Mar 2009 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/95/D/1510/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1488/en-US
W.B.E. v. Netherlands
W.B.E. v. Netherlands CCPR/C/46/D/432/1990 Communication number s : 432/1990 Author: W.B.E. name deleted Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 46 Country Netherlands Submission date 20 Jul 1990 Date of decision 23 Oct 1992 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/46/D/432/1990https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/473/en-US
W.E.O. v. Sweden
W.E.O. v. Sweden CCPR/C/129/D/2741/2016 Communication number s : 2741/2016 Author: W.E.O. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 129 Country Sweden Submission date 26 Feb 2016 Date of decision 23 Jul 2020 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/129/D/2741/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2844/en-US
W.M.G. v. Canada
W.M.G. v. Canada CCPR/C/116/D/2060/2011 Communication number s : 2060/2011 Author: W.M.G. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 116 Country Canada Submission date 10 May 2011 Date of decision 11 Mar 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/116/D/2060/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3538/en-US
WAINWRIGHT v. the United Kingdom
WAINWRIGHT v. the United Kingdom GBR 26/12/2006 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of private life: Failure of authorities to comply strictly with procedures for the proper conduct of strip searches of a mother and son visiting a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3027
WALCZAK v. Poland
WALCZAK v. Poland POL 09/07/2020 00:00:00 21/07/2020 14:49:16 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Unnecessary interference due to the authorities refusal of family visits by the applicant s wife during detention. Article 8 Status of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55603
WALDEMAR NOWAKOWSKI v. Poland
WALDEMAR NOWAKOWSKI v. Poland POL 17/12/2012 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Disproportionate interference with property rights: confiscation of the applicant s collection of antique weapons from the Second World War and earlier by domestic EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-19921
WATSON v. France
WATSON v. France FRA 16/09/1999 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:14:44 Case Description: Protection of private life and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unlawful interference due to the use of listening devices in the apartment of a third party EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33007
WELSH AND SILVA CANHA v. Portugal
WELSH AND SILVA CANHA v. Portugal PRT 30/08/2022 00:00:00 02/09/2022 10:09:44 Case Description: This case concerns an unjustified interference with the freedom of expression of the applicants journalists and respectively the editor and deputy editor of a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-61009
WERRA NATURSTEIN GMBH & CO KG v. Germany
WERRA NATURSTEIN GMBH CO KG v. Germany DEU 19/04/2017 00:00:00 03/05/2017 11:45:10 Case Description: Violation of the right to protection of property on account of the total lack of compensation as regards the applicant company s mining licence and the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46759
WIRTSCHAFTS-TREND ZEITSCHRIFTEN-VERGLAS GMBH v. Austria
WIRTSCHAFTS TREND ZEITSCHRIFTEN VERGLAS GMBH v. Austria AUT 27/01/2006 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to conviction for defamation for publishing an article in the applicant company EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-967
WIRTSCHAFTS-TREND ZEITSCHRIFTEN-VERLAGSGESELLSCHAFT M.B.H. v. Austria
WIRTSCHAFTS TREND ZEITSCHRIFTEN VERLAGSGESELLSCHAFT M.B.H. v. Austria AUT 13/03/2006 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to conviction for defamation for publishing an article in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-979