Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 3961 - 3980 of 4362
Sultanova v. Uzbekistan
Sultanova v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/86/D/915/2000 Communication number s : 915/2000 Author: Darmon Sultanova Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 86 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 07 Feb 2000 Date of decision 30 Mar 2006 Comment: In accordance JUTBCCPR/C/86/D/915/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1250/en-US
Summary of Stakeholders’ submissions on Croatia* - Report of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights
United Nations A/HRC/WG.6/36/HRV/3 General Assembly Distr.: General 28 February 2020 Original: English Human Rights Council Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review Thirty sixth session 4 15 May 2020 Summary of Stakeholders submissions on Croatia UPRA/HRC/WG.6/36/HRV/3https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/reports/summary-stakeholders-submissions-croatia-report-office-united-nations-high
Sunnet Jarrarow v. Turkmenistan
Sunnet Jarrarow v. Turkmenistan CCPR/C/115/D/2223/2012 Communication number s : 2223/2012 Author: Sunnet Jarrarow Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 115 Country Turkmenistan Submission date 03 Sep 2012 Date of decision 29 Oct 2015 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/115/D/2223/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2048/en-US
Surgan v. Belarus
Surgan v. Belarus CCPR/C/114/D/1969/2010 Communication number s : 1969/2010 Author: Taras Surgan Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 114 Country Belarus Submission date 28 May 2010 Date of decision 15 Jul 2015 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/114/D/1969/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2011/en-US
Svetlana Zhuk v. Belarus
Svetlana Zhuk v. Belarus CCPR/C/109/D/1910/2009 Communication number s : 1910/2009 Author: Svetlana Zhuk Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 109 Country Belarus Submission date 27 Oct 2009 Date of decision 30 Oct 2013 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/109/D/1910/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1689/en-US
Sweden should enable Ombuds institutions to investigate discrimination by public authorities and improve integration support for migrant women
Sweden should enable Ombuds institutions to investigate discrimination by public authorities and improve integration support for migrant women SWE 2020 10 01 2020 12 08 Sweden should enable Ombuds institutions to investigate discrimination by public ECRISWE-PR-V-2020-331-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=SWE-PR-V-2020-331-ENG
T. A. v. Sweden
T. A. v. Sweden CAT/C/39/D/303/2006 Communication number s : 303/2006 Author: T. A. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 39 Country Sweden Submission date 15 Sep 2006 Date of decision 22 Nov 2007 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/39/D/303/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/88/en-US
T. A. v. Sweden
T. A. v. Sweden CAT/C/34/D/226/2003 Communication number s : 226/2003 Author: T. A. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 34 Country Sweden Submission date 16 Jan 2003 Date of decision 06 May 2005 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/34/D/226/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/138/en-US
T.A. v. Switzerland
T.A. v. Switzerland CAT/C/73/D/914/2019 Communication number s : 914/2019 Author: T.A. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 73 Country Switzerland Submission date 13 Feb 2019 Date of decision 28 Apr 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/73/D/914/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3052/en-US
T.B. v. Switzerland
T.B. v. Switzerland CAT/C/73/D/862/2018 Communication number s : 862/2018 Author: T.B Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 73 Country Switzerland Submission date 21 Feb 2018 Date of decision 22 Apr 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/73/D/862/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3139/en-US
T.D.J. v. Denmark
T.D.J. v. Denmark CCPR/C/127/D/2654/2015 Communication number s : 2654/2015 Author: T.D.J. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 127 Country Denmark Submission date 05 Oct 2015 Date of decision 08 Nov 2019 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/127/D/2654/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2813/en-US
T.E.A. v. Spain
T.E.A. v. Spain CRC/C/89/D/50/2018 Communication number s : 50/2018 Author: T.E.A. Type of decision: Discontinuance decision Session No 89 Country Spain Submission date 03 Aug 2018 Date of decision 08 Feb 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCRC/C/89/D/50/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3003/en-US
T. E. M. O. v. Spain
T. E. M. O. v. Spain E/C.12/70/D/62/2018 Communication number s : 062/2018 Author: T. E. M. O. Type of decision: Discontinuance decision Session No 70 To be confirmed Country Spain Submission date 04 Oct 2018 Date of decision 12 Oct 2021 Comment: This JUTBE/C.12/70/D/62/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2979/en-US
T.I. v. Canada,Uzbekistan
T.I. v. Canada Uzbekistan CAT/C/45/D/333/2007 Communication number s : 333/2007 Author: T.I. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 45 Country Canada Uzbekistan Submission date 15 Sep 2007 Date of decision 15 Nov 2010 Comment: This document has JUTBCAT/C/45/D/333/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/62/en-US
T.K.T. v. Switzerland
T.K.T. v. Switzerland CAT/C/71/D/866/2018 Communication number s : 866/2018 Author: T.K.T. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 71 Country Switzerland Submission date 16 Mar 2018 Date of decision 19 Jul 2021 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/71/D/866/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3373/en-US
T. M. and Z. I v. Uzbekistan
T. M. and Z. I v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/98/D/1206/2003 Communication number s : 1206/2003 Author: T. M. and Z. I Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 98 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 13 Oct 2003 Date of decision 10 Mar 2010 Comment: Under rule JUTBCCPR/C/98/D/1206/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1551/en-US
T.M. v. Greece
T.M. v. Greece CRPD/C/21/D/42/2017 Communication number s : 042/2017 Author: T.M. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 21 Country Greece Submission date 21 Mar 2017 Date of decision 02 Apr 2019 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCRPD/C/21/D/42/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2516/en-US
T. M. v. Republic of Korea
T. M. v. Republic of Korea CAT/C/53/D/519/2012 Communication number s : 519/2012 Author: T. M. represented by counsel Jae Chang Oh Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 53 Country Republic of Korea Submission date 24 Apr 2012 Date of decision 21 JUTBCAT/C/53/D/519/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2059/en-US
T.M. v. Sweden
T.M. v. Sweden CAT/C/68/D/860/2018 Communication number s : 860/2018 Author: T.M. represented by counsel Daniel Carnestedt Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 68 Country Sweden Submission date 21 Jan 2018 Date of decision 06 Dec 2019 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/68/D/860/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2702/en-US
T.P.S. v. Canada
T.P.S. v. Canada CAT/C/24/D/99/1997 Communication number s : 099/1997 Author: T.P.S. name withheld Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 24 Country Canada Submission date 19 Nov 1997 Date of decision 16 May 2000 Comment: An individual opinion JUTBCAT/C/24/D/99/1997https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/216/en-US