Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 4281 - 4300 of 4500
Navruz Tahirovich Nasyrlayev v. Turkmenistan
Navruz Tahirovich Nasyrlayev v. Turkmenistan CCPR/C/117/D/2219/2012 Communication number s : 2219/2012 Author: Navruz Tahirovich Nasyrlayev represented by counsel Shane H. Brady Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 117 Country Turkmenistan JUTBCCPR/C/117/D/2219/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2170/en-US
Nell Toussaint v. Canada
Nell Toussaint v. Canada CCPR/C/123/D/2348/2014 Communication number s : 2348/2014 Author: Nell Toussaint Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 123 Country Canada Submission date 24 Dec 2013 Date of decision 24 Jul 2018 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/123/D/2348/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2541/en-US
Nikolaus Fürst Blücher von Wahlstatt v. Czech Republic
Nikolaus F rst Bl cher von Wahlstatt v. Czech Republic CCPR/C/99/D/1491/2006 Communication number s : 1491/2006 Author: Nikolaus F rst Bl cher von Wahlstatt Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 99 Country Czech Republic Submission date 07 Jul JUTBCCPR/C/99/D/1491/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1571/en-US
Nimal Silva Gunaratna v. Sri Lanka
Nimal Silva Gunaratna v. Sri Lanka CCPR/C/95/D/1432/2005 Communication number s : 1432/2005 Author: Dalkadura Arachchige Nimal Silva Gunaratna Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 95 Country Sri Lanka Submission date 01 Aug 2005 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/95/D/1432/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1499/en-US
O.K. v. Latvia
O.K. v. Latvia CCPR/C/110/D/1935/2010 Communication number s : 1935/2010 Author: O.K. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 110 Country Latvia Submission date 13 Nov 2009 Date of decision 19 Mar 2014 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/110/D/1935/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1810/en-US
OAO NEFTYANAYA KOMPANIYA YUKOS v. Russia
OAO NEFTYANAYA KOMPANIYA YUKOS v. Russia RUS 03/08/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: The case concerns different violations concerning tax and enforcement proceedings brought against the applicant oil company leading to its liquidation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14112
ONER AND TURK v. Turkey
ONER AND TURK v. Turkey TUR 30/06/2015 00:00:00 10/11/2016 11:41:27 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-36806
OPUZ v. Turkey
OPUZ v. Turkey TUR 09/09/2009 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:53:30 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the failure of the authorities to protect women the applicants or their female relatives from domestic violence despite having been reasonably EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37222
ORTHODOX OHRID ARCHDIOCESE v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
ORTHODOX OHRID ARCHDIOCESE v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia MKD 09/04/2018 00:00:00 19/07/2018 11:30:51 Case Description: These cases concern violations of the applicant associations right to freedom of association on account of the domestic EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49857
Olanguena Awono v. Cameroon
Olanguena Awono v. Cameroon CCPR/C/123/D/2660/2015 Communication number s : 2660/2015 Author: Urbain Olanguena Awono Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 123 Country Cameroon Submission date 01 Jun 2015 Date of decision 19 Jul 2018 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/123/D/2660/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3518/en-US
Oleksii Katashynskyi v. Ukraine
Oleksii Katashynskyi v. Ukraine CCPR/C/123/D/2250/2013 Communication number s : 2250/2013 Author: Oleksii Katashynskyi Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 123 Country Ukraine Submission date 19 Mar 2013 Date of decision 25 Jul 2018 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/123/D/2250/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2502/en-US
Ortikov v. Uzbekistan
Ortikov v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/118/D/2317/2013 Communication number s : 2317/2013 Author: Kayum Ortikov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 118 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 14 Jul 2013 Date of decision 26 Oct 2016 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/118/D/2317/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2145/en-US
P.L. and M.L. v. Estonia
P.L. and M.L. v. Estonia CCPR/C/127/D/2499/2014 Communication number s : 2499/2014 Author: P.L. and M.L. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 127 Country Estonia Submission date 19 Aug 2013 Date of decision 08 Nov 2019 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/127/D/2499/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2886/en-US
P.L. v. Germany
P.L. v. Germany CCPR/C/79/D/1003/2001 Communication number s : 1003/2001 Author: P.L. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 79 Country Germany Submission date 10 Mar 1999 Date of decision 22 Oct 2003 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/79/D/1003/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1069/en-US
P.N. et al. v. Finland
P.N. et al. v. Finland CRC/C/91/D/100/2019 Communication number s : 100/2019 Author: P.N. K.K. and O.M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 91 Country Finland Submission date 30 Sep 2019 Date of decision 12 Sep 2022 Comment: Joint opinion of JUTBCRC/C/91/D/100/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3440/en-US
PANAMA : OBSERVATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ADDRESSED TO THE STATE PARTY
PANAMA : OBSERVATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ADDRESSED TO THE STATE PARTY CAT/OP/PAN/1 NULL 2018 07 31T00:00:00 SPT United Nations CAT/OP/PAN/1 Optional Protocol to the Distr.: General 31 July 2018 Convention against Torture English and Other Cruel Inhuman UHRICAT/OP/PAN/1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/c2d37c6f-cdef-4043-98e8-90b03f0545a4
PATSURIA v. Georgia
PATSURIA v. Georgia GEO 06/02/2008 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:08:10 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Continued detention on grounds which cannot be regarded as relevant or sufficient and in absence of a valid court order unfair conduct of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3351
POLYAKH AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
POLYAKH AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 24/02/2020 00:00:00 20/03/2020 16:31:03 Case Description: These cases concern the applicants right to respect for their private and family life which has been violated as a result of lustration violation of the Article 8 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54941
Polacková and Polacek v. Czech Republic
Polackov and Polacek v. Czech Republic CCPR/C/90/D/1445/2006 Communication number s : 1445/2006 Author: Libuse Polackov and Joseph Polacek Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 90 Country Czech Republic Submission date 20 Dec 2005 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/90/D/1445/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1388/en-US
Purna Maya v. Nepal
Purna Maya v. Nepal CCPR/C/119/D/2245/2013 Communication number s : 2245/2013 Author: Purna Maya Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 119 Country Nepal Submission date Date of decision Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive issues: JUTBCCPR/C/119/D/2245/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2238/en-US