Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 81 - 100 of 8493
B.M.I. and N.A.K. v. Denmark
B.M.I. and N.A.K. v. Denmark CCPR/C/118/D/2569/2015 Communication number s : 2569/2015 Author: B.M.I. and N.A.K. represented by counsel Hannah Krog Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 118 Country Denmark Submission date 06 Feb 2015 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/118/D/2569/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2229/en-US
B. M. v. Switzerland
B. M. v. Switzerland CEDAW/C/83/D/132/2018 Communication number s : 132/2018 Author: B. M. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 83 Country Switzerland Submission date 09 Aug 2018 Date of decision 17 Oct 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCEDAW/C/83/D/132/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3557/en-US
B.S.S. v. Canada
B.S.S. v. Canada CAT/C/32/D/183/2001 Communication number s : 183/2001 Author: B.S.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 32 Country Canada Submission date 07 Mar 2001 Date of decision 12 May 2004 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/32/D/183/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/149/en-US
B.S. and N.K. v. Canada
B.S. and N.K. v. Canada CAT/C/71/D/798/2017 Communication number s : 798/2017 Author: B.S. and N.K. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 71 Country Canada Submission date 13 Jan 2017 Date of decision 23 Jul 2020 Comment: Individual JUTBCAT/C/71/D/798/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3425/en-US
B.S. v. Austria
B.S. v. Austria CAT/C/75/D/1118/2022 Communication number s : 1118/2022 Author: B.S. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 75 Country Austria Submission date 08 Dec 2021 Date of decision 04 Nov 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/75/D/1118/2022https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3619/en-US
BAJIC v. North Macedonia
BAJIC v. North Macedonia MKD 10/09/2021 00:00:00 23/09/2021 15:54:44 Case Description: This case concerns a violation of the applicant s right to a fair trial due to the failure of the Supreme Court to communicate to the applicant the public prosecutor s EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58423
BAK v. Poland
BAK v. Poland POL 16/04/2007 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: The cases of Bak and Majewski concern the excessive length of criminal and civil proceedings respectively violations of Article 6 1 . They also concern certain problems in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20594
BALSAN v. Romania
BALSAN v. Romania ROU 23/08/2017 00:00:00 15/09/2017 15:07:24 Case Description: This case concerns the failure of the investigating prosecuting and judicial authorities to comply with their positive obligation under Article 3 to protect the applicant from EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47601
BATI AND OTHERS v. Turkey
BATI AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 03/09/2004 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:53:30 Case Description: This group of judgments 1 concerns the ineffectiveness of investigations criminal prosecutions and disciplinary proceedings in relation to killing torture ill EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37206
BAUMET v. France
BAUMET v. France FRA 24/10/2007 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:16:17 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfairness of proceedings before the courts of audit due to disclosure of certain documents to the prosecutor and the reporting EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33191
BRAGADIREANU v. Romania
BRAGADIREANU v. Romania ROU 06/03/2008 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: This group currently consisting of 121 judgments 1 mainly concerns the inhuman and/or degrading treatment suffered by the applicants due to overcrowding and poor EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12985
BRODA AND BOJARA v. Poland
BRODA AND BOJARA v. Poland POL 29/09/2021 00:00:00 22/10/2021 14:42:32 Case Description: The Reczkowicz group concerns infringements of the right to a tribunal established by law due to the fact that the judges of the various chambers in the Supreme Court EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58717
BUCUR AND TOMA v. Romania
BUCUR AND TOMA v. Romania ROU 08/04/2013 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: This case concerns the disclosure by the first applicant a military official in the Romanian Intelligence Service SRI of information on wide scale illegal telephone EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12840
BUNTOV v. Russia
BUNTOV v. Russia RUS 09/05/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: The cases in this group mainly concern torture and ill treatment inflicted in the penitentiary facilities and their ineffective investigation substantive and procedural EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14152
Bakurov v. Russian Federation
Bakurov v. Russian Federation CCPR/C/107/D/1861/2009 Communication number s : 1861/2009 Author: Sergei Bakurov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 107 Country Russian Federation Submission date 22 Sep 2008 Date of decision 25 Mar 2013 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/107/D/1861/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1650/en-US
Banda Weerasinghe v. Sri Lanka
Banda Weerasinghe v. Sri Lanka CCPR/C/91/D/1031/2001 Communication number s : 1031/2001 Author: Amaranada Banda Weerasinghe Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 91 Country Sri Lanka Submission date 18 Jan 2001 Date of decision 31 Oct 2007 JUTBCCPR/C/91/D/1031/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1357/en-US
Bandajevsky v. Belarus
Bandajevsky v. Belarus CCPR/C/86/D/1100/2002 Communication number s : 1100/2002 Author: Yuri Bandajevsky Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 86 Country Belarus Submission date 19 Apr 2002 Date of decision 28 Mar 2006 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/86/D/1100/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1248/en-US
Baroy v. Philippines
Baroy v. Philippines CCPR/C/79/D/1045/2002 Communication number s : 1045/2002 Author: Alfredo Baroy Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 79 Country Philippines Submission date 04 Jan 2002 Date of decision 31 Oct 2003 Comment: Under rule JUTBCCPR/C/79/D/1045/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/372/en-US
Barry v. Trinidad and Tobago
Barry v. Trinidad and Tobago CCPR/C/51/D/471/1991 Communication number s : 471/1991 Author: Theophilus Barry Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 51 Country Trinidad and Tobago Submission date 29 Sep 1991 Date of decision 18 Jul 1994 JUTBCCPR/C/51/D/471/1991https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/515/en-US
Batanov v. Russian Federation
Batanov v. Russian Federation CCPR/C/120/D/2532/2015 Communication number s : 2532/2015 Author: Anton Batanov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 120 Country Russian Federation Submission date 25 May 2014 Date of decision 28 Jul 2017 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/120/D/2532/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2322/en-US