Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1681 - 1700 of 1950
Decision on the merits: University Women of Europe (UWE) v. Italy, Complaint No. 133/2016
Decision on the merits: University Women of Europe UWE v. Italy Complaint No. 133/2016 ITA 01 00 000 04 00 000 04 03 000 20 00 000 91 100 163 91 118 163 91 121 163 91 197 163 2019 12 06 2020 06 29 European Committee of Social Rights Comit europ en des ESCcc-133-2016-dmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-133-2016-dmerits-en
Decision on the merits: University Women of Europe (UWE) v. Norway, Complaint No. 135/2016
Decision on the merits: University Women of Europe UWE v. Norway Complaint No. 135/2016 NOR 01 00 000 04 00 000 04 03 000 20 00 000 91 100 163 91 118 163 91 121 163 91 197 163 2019 12 05 2020 06 29 European Committee of Social Rights Comit europ en des ESCcc-135-2016-dmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-135-2016-dmerits-en
Decision on the merits: University Women of Europe (UWE) v. Slovenia, Complaint No. 137/2016
Decision on the merits: University Women of Europe UWE v. Slovenia Complaint No. 137/2016 SVN 01 00 000 04 00 000 04 03 000 20 00 000 91 100 163 91 118 163 91 121 163 91 197 163 2019 12 05 2020 06 29 European Committee of Social Rights Comit europ en des ESCcc-137-2016-dmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-137-2016-dmerits-en
Decision on the merits: University Women of Europe (UWE) v. Sweden, Complaint No. 138/2016
Decision on the merits: University Women of Europe UWE v. Sweden Complaint No. 138/2016 SWE 01 00 000 04 00 000 04 03 000 20 00 000 91 100 163 91 118 163 91 121 163 91 197 163 2019 12 06 2019 12 06 European Committee of Social Rights Comit europ en des ESCcc-138-2016-dmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-138-2016-dmerits-en
Decision on the merits: University Women of Europe (UWE) v. the Netherlands, Complaint No. 134/2016
Decision on the merits: University Women of Europe UWE v. the Netherlands Complaint No. 134/2016 NLD 01 00 000 04 00 000 04 03 000 20 00 000 91 100 163 91 118 163 91 121 163 91 197 163 2019 12 06 2020 06 29 European Committee of Social Rights Comit europ ESCcc-134-2016-dmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-134-2016-dmerits-en
Decision on the mertis: University Women of Europe (UWE) v. Czech Republic, Complaint No. 128/2016
Decision on the mertis: University Women of Europe UWE v. Czech Republic Complaint No. 128/2016 CZE 01 00 000 04 00 000 04 03 000 20 00 000 91 100 163 91 118 163 91 121 163 91 197 163 2019 12 05 2020 06 29 European Committee of Social Rights Comit europ ESCcc-128-2016-dmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-128-2016-dmerits-en
Decision on the mertis: University Women of Europe (UWE) v. Portugal, Complaint No. 136/2016
Decision on the mertis: University Women of Europe UWE v. Portugal Complaint No. 136/2016 PRT 01 00 000 04 00 000 04 03 000 20 00 000 91 100 163 91 118 163 91 121 163 91 197 163 2019 12 05 2020 06 29 European Committee of Social Rights Comit europ en des ESCcc-136-2016-dmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-136-2016-dmerits-en
Deepan Budlakoti v. Canada
Deepan Budlakoti v. Canada CCPR/C/122/D/2264/2013 Communication number s : 2264/2013 Author: Deepan Budlakoti Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 122 Country Canada Submission date 04 Jul 2013 Date of decision 06 Apr 2018 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/122/D/2264/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2479/en-US
Domukovsky et al. v. Georgia
Domukovsky et al. v. Georgia CCPR/C/62/D/623/1995 Communication number s : 623/1995 627/1995 624/1995 626/1995 Author: Victor P. Domukovsky Zaza Tsiklauri Petre Gelbakhiani and Irakli Dokvadze Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 62 Country JUTBCCPR/C/62/D/623/1995https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/833/en-US
E.V. v. Belarus
E.V. v. Belarus CCPR/C/112/D/1989/2010 Communication number s : 1989/2010 Author: E.V. not represented by counsel Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 112 Country Belarus Submission date 29 Jun 2010 Date of decision 30 Oct 2014 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/1989/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1895/en-US
European Convention on Establishment (ETS No. 019)
European Convention on Establishment ETS No. 019 019 Paris 1955 12 13T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the member States of the Council of Europe Paris 1965 02 23T00:00:00 5 Ratifications. Under this Convention each Party guarantees to nationals of COEETS No. 019https://rm.coe.int/168006457f
Evgeny Basarevsky; Valery Rybchenko v. Belarus
Evgeny Basarevsky Valery Rybchenko v. Belarus CCPR/C/117/D/2108/2011 CCPR/C/117/D/2109/2011 Communication number s : 2108/2011 2109/2011 Author: Evgeny Basarevsky Valery Rybchenko Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 117 Country Belarus JUTBCCPR/C/117/D/2108/2011-CCPR/C/117/D/2109/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2126/en-US
F.A.J. and B.M.R.A. v. Spain
F.A.J. and B.M.R.A. v. Spain CCPR/C/130/D/3599/2019 Communication number s : 3599/2019 Author: F.A.J. and B.M.R.A. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 130 Country Spain Submission date 14 Jan 2019 Date of decision 28 Oct 2020 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/130/D/3599/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3286/en-US
F.J. et al. v. Australia
F.J. et al. v. Australia CCPR/C/116/D/2233/2013 Communication number s : 2233/2013 Author: F.J. et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 116 Country Australia Submission date 03 Dec 2012 Date of decision 22 Mar 2016 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/116/D/2233/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3092/en-US
FEDORCHENKO AND LOZENKO v. Ukraine
FEDORCHENKO AND LOZENKO v. Ukraine UKR 20/12/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: This group of cases mainly concerns the lack of effective investigations into violent acts against the applicants including into the possible motives of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31354
FIFTH EVALUATION ROUND Preventing corruption and promoting integrity in central governments (top executive functions) and law enforcement agencies EVALUATION REPORT ESTONIA
FIFTH EVALUATION ROUND Preventing corruption and promoting integrity in central governments top executive functions and law enforcement agencies EVALUATION REPORT ESTONIA EST 2018 12 07 2018 12 07 Adoption Publication 7 December 2018 Public GrecoEval5Rep GRECOGrecoEval5Rep-2018-3-Final-eng-Estonia-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoEval5Rep-2018-3-Final-eng-Estonia-PUBLIC
FIFTH EVALUATION ROUND Preventing corruption and promoting integrity in central governments (top executive functions) and law enforcement agencies EVALUATION REPORT UNITED KINGDOM
FIFTH EVALUATION ROUND Preventing corruption and promoting integrity in central governments top executive functions and law enforcement agencies EVALUATION REPORT UNITED KINGDOM GBR 2017 12 08 2018 05 17 Adoption: 8 December 2017 Publication: 17 May 2018 GRECOGrecoEval5Rep-2017-1-Final-eng-UK-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoEval5Rep-2017-1-Final-eng-UK-PUBLIC
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of Parliament, judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of Parliament judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA MDA 2016 07 01 2016 07 05 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY II. CONTEXT III. GRECOGrecoEval4Rep-2016-6-eng-Final-Moldova-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoEval4Rep-2016-6-eng-Final-Moldova-PUBLIC
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors COMPLIANCE REPORT UNITED KINGDOM
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament judges and prosecutors COMPLIANCE REPORT UNITED KINGDOM GBR 2014 12 12 2015 01 19 I. INTRODUCTION The Compliance Report assesses the measures taken by the authorities of the GRECOGreco-RC-IV-2014-3E-Final-UK-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-RC-IV-2014-3E-Final-UK-PUBLIC
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT BELGIUM
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT BELGIUM BEL 2014 03 28 2014 03 28 0 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY II. CONTEXT III. CORRUPTION GRECOGreco-Eval-IV-Rep-2013-8E-Final-Belgium-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-Eval-IV-Rep-2013-8E-Final-Belgium-PUBLIC