Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 40
C. v. Australia
C. v. Australia CCPR/C/76/D/900/1999 Communication number s : 900/1999 Author: C. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 76 Country Australia Submission date 23 Nov 1999 Date of decision 28 Oct 2002 Comment: Under rule 85 of the Committee s rules JUTBCCPR/C/76/D/900/1999https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1026/en-US
CASE OF ABU ZUBAYDAH v. LITHUANIA
CASE OF ABU ZUBAYDAH v. LITHUANIA 46454/11 DUFFY H. MICKUM IV G.B. MARGULIES J. LTU 5/31/2018 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 34 Individual applications Art. 34 Victim Preliminary objections joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0531JUD004645411https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-183687
CASE OF AL NASHIRI v. ROMANIA
CASE OF AL NASHIRI v. ROMANIA 33234/12 GOLDSTON J.A. SKILBECK R. SINGH A. HOLLANDER N. HATNEANU D.O. ROU 5/31/2018 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0531JUD003323412https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-183685
CASE OF ERGASHEV v. RUSSIA
CASE OF ERGASHEV v. RUSSIA 12106/09 TSEYTLINA O MEMORIAL HUMAN RIGHTS CENTRE RUS 12/20/2011 12:00:00 AM Violations of Art. 3 substantive aspect Violation of Art. 5 1 Violation of Art. 6 2 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1220JUD001210609 FIRST SECTION CASE OF ERGASHEV ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1220JUD001210609https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-108162
CASE OF ILIAS AND AHMED v. HUNGARY
CASE OF ILIAS AND AHMED v. HUNGARY 47287/15 POH RNOK B. HUN 11/21/2019 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection allowed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Six month period Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Ratione materiae ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1121JUD004728715https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-198760
CASE OF KAVALA v. TURKEY
CASE OF KAVALA v. TURKEY 28749/18 BAYRAKTAR K. TUR 12/10/2019 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 5 Right to liberty and security Article 5 1 Lawful arrest or detention Article 5 1 c Reasonable suspicion Violation of Article 5 Right to liberty and security ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1210JUD002874918https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-199515
CASE OF MAGYAR JETI ZRT v. HUNGARY
CASE OF MAGYAR JETI ZRT v. HUNGARY 11257/16 VERMEER V. HUN 12/4/2018 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 10 Freedom of expression general Article 10 1 Freedom of expression Pecuniary damage award Article 41 Pecuniary damage Just satisfaction 451 429 149 148 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1204JUD001125716https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-187930
CASE OF MURŠIĆ v. CROATIA
CASE OF MUR I v. CROATIA 7334/13 VIDOVIC Z. HRV 10/20/2016 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Degrading treatment Substantive aspect No violation ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1020JUD000733413https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-167483
CASE OF SIDIROPOULOS AND OTHERS v. GREECE
CASE OF SIDIROPOULOS AND OTHERS v. GREECE 26695/95 N/A GRC 7/10/1998 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection rejected non exhaustion of domestic remedies Preliminary objection rejected abuse of process Violation of Art. 11 Not necessary to examine Art. 6 1 Not ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0710JUD002669595https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58205
CASE OF VO v. FRANCE
CASE OF VO v. FRANCE 53924/00 N/A FRA 7/8/2004 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections rejected ratione materiae non exhaustion of domestic remedies No violation of Art. 2 449 231 310 238 14 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0708JUD005392400 CASE OF VO v. FRANCE Application ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0708JUD005392400https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-61887
Conclusions 2006 - Moldova - Article 12-4
Conclusions 2006 Moldova Article 12 4 MDA 12 04 000 30/06/2006 30/06/2006 Article 12 Right to social security Paragraph 4 Social security of persons moving between states The Committee takes note of the information provided in the Moldovan report. Moldova ESC2006/def/MDA/12/4/ENhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=2006/def/MDA/12/4/EN
Conclusions 2006 - Moldova - Article 16
Conclusions 2006 Moldova Article 16 MDA 16 00 000 30/06/2006 30/06/2006 Article 16 Right of the family to social legal and economic protection The Committee takes note of the information provided in Moldova s report. Social protection of the family ESC2006/def/MDA/16//ENhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=2006/def/MDA/16//EN
Conclusions 2011 - Azerbaijan - Article 16-
Conclusions 2011 Azerbaijan Article 16 AZE 16 00 000 09/12/2011 10/01/2012 Article 16 Right of the family to social legal and economic protection The Committee takes note of the information contained in the report submitted by Azerbaijan. As the notion of ESC2011/def/AZE/16//ENhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=2011/def/AZE/16//EN
Conclusions 2011 - Bosnia and Herzegovina - Article 16-
Conclusions 2011 Bosnia and Herzegovina Article 16 BIH 16 00 000 09/12/2011 17/01/2012 Article 16 Right of the family to social legal and economic protection The Committee takes note of the information contained in the report submitted by Bosnia and ESC2011/def/BIH/16//ENhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=2011/def/BIH/16//EN
Convention on Mutual Administrative Assistance in Tax Matters (ETS No. 127)
Convention on Mutual Administrative Assistance in Tax Matters ETS No. 127 127 Strasbourg 1988 01 25T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the member States of the Council of Europe and the Member countries of OECD and in its version amended by the 2010 COEETS No. 127https://rm.coe.int/16806a42b0
F.O.F. v. Brazil
F.O.F. v. Brazil CRPD/C/23/D/40/2017 Communication number s : 40/2017 Author: F.O.F. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 23 Country Brazil Submission date 21 Dec 2016 Date of decision 02 Sep 2020 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCRPD/C/23/D/40/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3071/en-US
First General Report on GRETA's activities covering the period from February 2009 to July 2011
First General Report on GRETA s activities covering the period from February 2009 to July 2011 2011 09 01 G R E T A Group of Experts on Action against Trafficking in Human Beings Public GRETA 2011 11 First General Report on GRETA s activities covering the GRETAGEN--2011-11-ENGhttps://hudoc.greta.coe.int/eng?i=GEN--2011-11-ENG
Fourth General Report on GRETA's activities covering the period 1 August 2013 to 30 September 2014
Fourth General Report on GRETA s activities covering the period 1 August 2013 to 30 September 2014 2015 04 16 G R E T A Group of Experts on Action against Trafficking in Human Beings GRETA 2015 1 Fourth General Report on GRETA s activities covering the GRETAGEN--2015-1-ENGhttps://hudoc.greta.coe.int/eng?i=GEN--2015-1-ENG
Gerasimov v. Kazakhstan
Gerasimov v. Kazakhstan CAT/C/48/D/433/2010 Communication number s : 433/2010 Author: Alexander Gerasimov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 48 Country Kazakhstan Submission date 22 Apr 2010 Date of decision 24 May 2012 Comment: The decision JUTBCAT/C/48/D/433/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/26/en-US
Independent Expert on human rights and international solidarity
Report to HRC A/HRC/32/43/Add.1 from 15 January 2016 to 20 January 2016 27 April 2016 Independent Expert on human rights and international solidarity Morocco United Nations A/HRC/32/43/Add.1 General Assembly Distr.: General 27 April 2016 Original: English UNSPA/HRC/32/43/Add.1https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f32%2f43%2fAdd.1&Lang=en