Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 861 - 880 of 17427
Brun v. France
Brun v. France CCPR/C/88/D/1453/2006 Communication number s : 1453/2006 Author: Andr Brun Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 88 Country France Submission date 15 Nov 2005 Date of decision 18 Oct 2006 Comment: Pursuant to rule 90 of the JUTBCCPR/C/88/D/1453/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1319/en-US
Brychta v. Czech Republic
Brychta v. Czech Republic CCPR/C/97/D/1618/2007 Communication number s : 1618/2007 Author: Frantisek Brychta Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 97 Country Czech Republic Submission date 20 Sep 2006 Date of decision 27 Oct 2009 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/97/D/1618/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1547/en-US
Buffo Carballal v. Uruguay
Buffo Carballal v. Uruguay CCPR/C/12/D/33/1978 Communication number s : 033/1978 Author: Leopoldo Buffo Carballal Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 12 Country Uruguay Submission date 30 May 1978 Date of decision 27 Mar 1981 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/12/D/33/1978https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/648/en-US
Bujdosó v. Hungary
Bujdos v. Hungary CRPD/C/10/D/4/2011 Communication number s : 004/2011 Author: J nos Fiala Disability Rights Center Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 10 Country Hungary Submission date 14 Sep 2011 Date of decision 09 Sep 2013 Comment: This JUTBCRPD/C/10/D/4/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1988/en-US
Burkina Faso’s human rights record to be reviewed by Universal Periodic Review
FrenchGENEVA 2 May 2018 Burkina Faso s human rights record will be examined by the UN Human Rights Council s Universal Periodic Review UPR Working Group for the third time on Monday 7 May 2018 in a meeting that will be webcast live. Burkina Faso is one of UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2018/05/burkina-fasos-human-rights-record-be-reviewed-universal-periodic-review
Busyo et al. v. Congo,Democratic Republic of the Congo
Busyo et al. v. Congo Democratic Republic of the Congo CCPR/C/78/D/933/2000 Communication number s : 933/2000 Author: Adrien Mundyo Busyo Thomas Osthudi Wongodi Ren Sibu Matubuka et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 78 Country Congo JUTBCCPR/C/78/D/933/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1080/en-US
Butovenko v. Ukraine
Butovenko v. Ukraine CCPR/C/102/D/1412/2005 Communication number s : 1412/2005 Author: Aleksandr Butovenko Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 102 Country Ukraine Submission date 28 Mar 2005 Date of decision 19 Jul 2011 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/102/D/1412/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1207/en-US
C.A.R.M. et al. v. Canada
C.A.R.M. et al. v. Canada CAT/C/38/D/298/2006 Communication number s : 298/2006 Author: C.A.R.M. et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 38 Country Canada Submission date 26 Jun 2006 Date of decision 18 May 2007 Comment: This document has JUTBCAT/C/38/D/298/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/92/en-US
C.C.M.C. v. Romania
C.C.M.C. v. Romania ROU 28/01/1999 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of proceedings before administrative and judicial authorities in particular length of proceedings to obtain EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-16007
C.C.N. v. Sweden
C.C.N. v. Sweden CCPR/C/136/D/3701/2020 Communication number s : 3701/2020 Author: C.C.N. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 136 Country Sweden Submission date 03 Jan 2020 Date of decision 24 Oct 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/136/D/3701/2020https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3680/en-US
C.E.A. v. Finland
C.E.A. v. Finland CCPR/C/42/D/316/1988 Communication number s : 316/1988 Author: C.E.A. name deleted Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 42 Country Finland Submission date 04 Jul 1988 Date of decision 10 Jul 1991 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/42/D/316/1988https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/578/en-US
C.E. v. Canada
C.E. v. Canada CCPR/C/2/D/13/1977 Communication number s : 013/1977 Author: C.E. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 2 Country Canada Submission date 20 Jun 1977 Date of decision 25 Aug 1977 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/2/D/13/1977https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/403/en-US
C.F. v. Jamaica
C.F. v. Jamaica CCPR/C/45/D/382/1989 Communication number s : 382/1989 Author: C.F. name deleted Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 45 Country Jamaica Submission date 02 Aug 1989 Date of decision 28 Jul 1992 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/45/D/382/1989https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/294/en-US
C.G. AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria
C.G. AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria BGR 24/07/2008 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: The cases C.G. and Others Kurilovich and Others M. and Others and Bou Hassoun concern shortcomings in the procedure for judicial review of decisions to expel foreign EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3769
C.H. v. Austria
C.H. v. Austria AUT 03/01/2001 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Infringement of the presumption of innocence due to the refusal of the applicant s claim for compensation in respect of his EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-811
C.L. and Z.L. v. Denmark
C.L. and Z.L. v. Denmark CCPR/C/122/D/2753/2016 Communication number s : 2753/2016 Author: C.L. and Z.L. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 122 Country Denmark Submission date 15 Mar 2016 Date of decision 26 Mar 2018 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/122/D/2753/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2484/en-US
C.M. v. Belgium
C.M. v. Belgium BEL 13/06/2018 00:00:00 29/06/2018 15:03:37 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Failure to enforce judicial decisions ordering the applicant s neighbour to carry out rehabilitation work in order to comply with EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49765
C.M. v. Switzerland
C.M. v. Switzerland CHE 17/04/2017 00:00:00 03/05/2017 11:45:10 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Failure of the Social Insurance Tribunal to send to the applicant the observations of the opposing party concerning his EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46747
C.N. v. Burundi
C.N. v. Burundi CAT/C/60/D/579/2013 Communication number s : 579/2013 Author: G.N. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 60 Country Burundi Submission date 11 Dec 2013 Date of decision 01 May 2017 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/60/D/579/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3016/en-US
C.N. v. the United Kingdom
C.N. v. the United Kingdom GBR 13/02/2013 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Domestic servitude and ineffective investigations of related complaints: inadequate legislative provisions to afford practical and effective protection against EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3021