Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 7853
4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights New York 16 December 1966 Entry into force : 23 March 1976 in accordance with article 49 for all provisions except those of article 41 UNIV-4https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-4&chapter=4&clang=_en
5th Round Evaluation Report on Poland
5th Round Evaluation Report on Poland POL 2018 12 07 2019 01 28 Adoption: 7 December 2018 Publication: 28 January 2019 Public GrecoEval5Rep 2018 1 FIFTH EVALUATION ROUND Preventing corruption and promoting integrity in central governments top executive GRECOGrecoEval5Rep(2018)1-Final-eng-Poland-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoEval5Rep(2018)1-Final-eng-Poland-PUBLIC
A.A. v. Canada
A.A. v. Canada CCPR/C/103/D/1819/2008 Communication number s : 1819/2008 Author: A.A. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 103 Country Canada Submission date 23 Sep 2008 Date of decision 31 Oct 2011 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/103/D/1819/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1626/en-US
A.B. v. Canada
A.B. v. Canada CCPR/C/117/D/2387/2014 Communication number s : 2387/2014 Author: A.B. represented by counsel Laura Brittain then Benjamin Liston Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 117 Country Canada Submission date 29 Apr 2014 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/117/D/2387/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2197/en-US
A.B. v. Finland
A.B. v. Finland CRC/C/86/D/51/2018 Communication number s : 051/2018 Author: A.B. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 86 Country Finland Submission date 27 Jun 2018 Date of decision 04 Feb 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCRC/C/86/D/51/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2946/en-US
A.H.G. v. Canada
A.H.G. v. Canada CCPR/C/113/D/2091/2011 Communication number s : 2091/2011 Author: A.H.G. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 113 Country Canada Submission date 28 Aug 2011 Date of decision 25 Mar 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/113/D/2091/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1926/en-US
A.K. et al. v. Australia
A.K. et al. v. Australia CCPR/C/132/D/2365/2014 Communication number s : 2365/2014 Author: A.K. et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 132 Country Australia Submission date 13 Mar 2014 Date of decision 08 Jul 2021 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/132/D/2365/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3109/en-US
A.M. v. Democratic Republic of the Congo,France
A.M. v. Democratic Republic of the Congo France CAT/C/44/D/302/2006 Communication number s : 302/2006 Author: A.M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 44 Country Democratic Republic of the Congo France Submission date 25 Sep 2006 Date of JUTBCAT/C/44/D/302/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/72/en-US
A.M. v. Switzerland
A.M. v. Switzerland CAT/C/65/D/841/2017 Communication number s : 841/2017 Author: A.M. represented by counsel Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 65 Country Switzerland Submission date 04 Sep 2017 Date of decision 15 Nov 2018 Comment: Decision JUTBCAT/C/65/D/841/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2475/en-US
A.N. v. Burundi
A.N. v. Burundi CAT/C/60/D/612/2014 Communication number s : 612/2014 Author: A.N. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 60 Country Burundi Submission date 24 Mar 2014 Date of decision 02 May 2017 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/60/D/612/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3018/en-US
A.Sh. et al. v. Switzerland
A.Sh. et al. v. Switzerland CAT/C/63/D/717/2015 Communication number s : 717/2015 Author: A.Sh. et al. represented by counsel Angela Stettler Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 63 Country Switzerland Submission date 25 Nov 2015 Date of JUTBCAT/C/63/D/717/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2730/en-US
A.W.K. v. New Zealand
A.W.K. v. New Zealand CCPR/C/112/D/1998/2010 Communication number s : 1998/2010 Author: A.W.K. represented by counsel Frank Deliu Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 112 Country New Zealand Submission date 02 Aug 2010 Date of decision 28 JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/1998/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1896/en-US
A.Y.O.AQ v. Italy
A.Y.O.AQ v. Italy CCPR/C/134/D/3587/2019 Communication number s : 3587/2019 Author: A.Y.O.AQ Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 134 Country Italy Submission date 02 May 2018 Date of decision 25 Mar 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/134/D/3587/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3145/en-US
Açikkollu v. Türkiye
A ikkollu v. T rkiye CCPR/C/136/D/3730/2020 Communication number s : 3730/2020 Author: M m ne A ikkollu Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 136 Country T rkiye Submission date 29 Jan 2020 Date of decision 25 Oct 2022 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/136/D/3730/2020https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3761/en-US
A. v. Denmark
A. v. Denmark CEDAW/C/62/D/53/2013 Communication number s : 53/2013 Author: A. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 62 Country Denmark Submission date 11 Apr 2013 Date of decision 19 Nov 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCEDAW/C/62/D/53/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3027/en-US
AGGERHOLM v. Denmark
AGGERHOLM v. Denmark DNK 15/12/2020 00:00:00 09/02/2021 09:54:42 Case Description: This case concerns the inhuman or degrading treatment in 2013 of a man suffering from paranoid schizophrenia who was strapped to a restraint bed in a psychiatric hospital EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56537
AGRATI AND OTHERS v. Italy
AGRATI AND OTHERS v. Italy ITA 28/11/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:13:26 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the retroactive application of Law No. 266/2005 to pending judicial proceedings concerning the approximately 310 applicants length of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28264
ALTUG TANER AKCAM v. Turkey
ALTUG TANER AKCAM v. Turkey TUR 25/01/2012 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:45:20 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37188
ARTUN AND GUVENER v. Turkey
ARTUN AND GUVENER v. Turkey TUR 26/09/2007 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:22:51 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37417
Abbahah v. Morocco
Abbahah v. Morocco CAT/C/72/D/871/2018 Communication number s : 871/2018 Author: Sidi Abdallah Abbahah Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 72 Country Morocco Submission date 09 May 2018 Date of decision 24 Nov 2021 Comment: This document has JUTBCAT/C/72/D/871/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3120/en-US