Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 6561 - 6580 of 7429
Perkins v. Jamaica
Perkins v. Jamaica CCPR/C/63/D/733/1997 Communication number s : 733/1997 Author: Andrew Perkins Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 63 Country Jamaica Submission date 20 Dec 1995 Date of decision 30 Jul 1998 Comment: communication was JUTBCCPR/C/63/D/733/1997https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/358/en-US
Persan v. Czech Republic
Persan v. Czech Republic CCPR/C/95/D/1479/2006 Communication number s : 1479/2006 Author: Jaroslav Persan Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 95 Country Czech Republic Submission date 17 Apr 2006 Date of decision 24 Mar 2009 Comment: An JUTBCCPR/C/95/D/1479/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1490/en-US
Petersen v. Germany
Petersen v. Germany CCPR/C/80/D/1115/2002 Communication number s : 1115/2002 Author: Werner Petersen Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 80 Country Germany Submission date 31 Jan 2002 Date of decision 01 Apr 2004 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/80/D/1115/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/854/en-US
Petromelidis v. Greece
Petromelidis v. Greece CCPR/C/132/D/3065/2017 Communication number s : 3065/2017 Author: Lazaros Petromelidis Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 132 Country Greece Submission date 31 Dec 2015 Date of decision 02 Jul 2021 Comment: Individual JUTBCCPR/C/132/D/3065/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3196/en-US
Pietraroia v. Uruguay
Pietraroia v. Uruguay CCPR/C/12/D/44/1979 Communication number s : 044/1979 Author: Alba Pietraroia alleged victim s daughter Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 12 Country Uruguay Submission date 01 Jan 1979 Date of decision 27 Mar 1981 JUTBCCPR/C/12/D/44/1979https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/622/en-US
Pinkney v. Canada
Pinkney v. Canada CCPR/C/14/D/27/1977 Communication number s : 027/1977 Author: Larry James Pinkney Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 14 Country Canada Submission date 25 Nov 1977 Date of decision 29 Oct 1981 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/14/D/27/1977https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/458/en-US
Pirogov v. Russian Federation
Pirogov v. Russian Federation CCPR/C/133/D/2916/2016 Communication number s : 2916/2016 Author: Evgeny Pirogov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 133 Country Russian Federation Submission date 31 Oct 2016 Date of decision 20 Oct 2021 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/133/D/2916/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3159/en-US
Poma Poma v. Peru
Poma Poma v. Peru CCPR/C/95/D/1457/2006 Communication number s : 1457/2006 Author: ngela Poma Poma Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 95 Country Peru Submission date 28 Dec 2004 Date of decision 27 Mar 2009 Comment: In accordance with rule 90 JUTBCCPR/C/95/D/1457/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1495/en-US
Poplavny, Sudalenko v. Belarus
Poplavny Sudalenko v. Belarus CCPR/C/118/D/2139/2012 Communication number s : 2139/2012 Author: Poplavny Sudalenko Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 118 Country Belarus Submission date 27 Feb 2012 Date of decision 03 Nov 2016 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/118/D/2139/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2129/en-US
Postnov v. Belarus
Postnov v. Belarus CCPR/C/132/D/2361/2014 Communication number s : 2361/2014 Author: Igor Postnov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 132 Country Belarus Submission date 22 Feb 2014 Date of decision 19 Jul 2021 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/132/D/2361/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3108/en-US
Prince v. South Africa
Prince v. South Africa CCPR/C/91/D/1474/2006 Communication number s : 1474/2006 Author: Gareth Anver Prince Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 91 Country South Africa Submission date 20 Oct 2005 Date of decision 31 Oct 2007 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/91/D/1474/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1380/en-US
Protocol No. 11 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, restructuring the control machinery established thereby (ETS No. 155) (*)
Protocol No. 11 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms restructuring the control machinery established thereby ETS No. 155 155 Strasbourg 1994 05 11T00:00:00 Since its entry into force this Protocol forms an COEETS No. 155https://rm.coe.int/168007cda9
Protocol No. 6 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms concerning the Abolition of the Death Penalty (ETS No. 114)
Protocol No. 6 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms concerning the Abolition of the Death Penalty ETS No. 114 114 Strasbourg 1983 04 28T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the member States signatories to Treaty COEETS No. 114https://rm.coe.int/168007952b
Protocol No. 8 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ETS No. 118) (*)
Protocol No. 8 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms ETS No. 118 118 Vienna 1985 03 19T00:00:00 Since its entry into force this Protocol forms an integrant part of ETS 5 and is closed to legal acts. Vienna 1990 01 COEETS No. 118https://rm.coe.int/168007a083
Protsko and Tolchi v. Belarus
Protsko and Tolchi v. Belarus CCPR/C/109/D/1919 1920/2009 Communication number s : 1919/2009 1920/2009 Author: Alexander Protsko and Andrei Tolchi Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 109 Country Belarus Submission date 22 Aug 2009 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/109/D/1919-1920/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1691/en-US
Protsko et al v. Belarus
Protsko et al v. Belarus CCPR/C/136/D/2712/2015 CCPR/C/136/D/2897/2016 Communication number s : 2897/2016 2909/2016 2910/2016 2915/2016 2712/2015 Author: Aleksandr Protsko and Eduard Nelyubovich Yury Lyashenko Natalya Shchukina Vladimir Katsora And Type JUTBCCPR/C/136/D/2712/2015, CCPR/C/136/D/2897/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3646/en-US
Public statement concerning Belgium
Public statement concerning Belgium BEL fee fkmb fkmp fkmv fkrg fkrgf fmfh fmme fmmf fmmfx ftb ftc 2017 07 13 2017 07 13 CPT/Inf 2017 18 European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment CPT Public statement CPTCPT/Inf (2017) 18https://hudoc.cpt.coe.int/eng?i=p-bel-2017decl-en
Public statement on the Russian Federation concerning the Chechen Republic and other republics of the North Caucasian region
Public statement on the Russian Federation concerning the Chechen Republic and other republics of the North Caucasian region RUS RUSNCR fcb fep fmmd 2019 03 11 2019 03 11 CPT/Inf 2019 6 European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or CPTCPT/Inf (2019) 6https://hudoc.cpt.coe.int/eng?i=p-rus-2019decl-en
Pustovoit v. Ukraine
Pustovoit v. Ukraine CCPR/C/110/D/1405/2005 Communication number s : 1405/2005 Author: Mikhail Pustovoit Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 110 Country Ukraine Submission date 21 Apr 2005 Date of decision 20 Mar 2013 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/110/D/1405/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1800/en-US
Q.A. v. Sweden
Q.A. v. Sweden CCPR/C/127/D/3070/2017 Communication number s : 3070/2017 Author: Q.A. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 127 Country Sweden Submission date 11 Dec 2017 Date of decision 30 Oct 2019 Comment: A joint opinion by Committee members JUTBCCPR/C/127/D/3070/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2806/en-US