Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 4381 - 4400 of 4410
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/7/7/Add.4 from 9 July 2007 to 13 July 2007 4 February 2008 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination Chile UNITED NATIONS A UNSPA/HRC/7/7/Add.4https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f7%2f7%2fAdd.4&Lang=en
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/33/43/Add.1 from 1 July 2015 to 8 July 2015 2 August 2016 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination Tunisia United Nations UNSPA/HRC/33/43/Add.1https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f33%2f43%2fAdd.1&Lang=en
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/27/50/Add.1 from 7 May 2014 to 16 May 2014 4 August 2014 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination Comoros United Nations UNSPA/HRC/27/50/Add.1https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f27%2f50%2fAdd.1&Lang=en
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/24/45/Add.2 from 8 December 2012 to 14 December 2012 1 July 2013 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination Somalia United UNSPA/HRC/24/45/Add.2https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f24%2f45%2fAdd.2&Lang=en
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/30/34/Add.1 from 7 October 2014 to 10 October 2014 17 August 2015 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination C te d Ivoire United UNSPA/HRC/30/34/Add.1https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f30%2f34%2fAdd.1&Lang=en
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/42/42/Add.1 from 16 April 2018 to 23 April 2018 2 July 2019 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination Chad United Nations UNSPA/HRC/42/42/Add.1https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f42%2f42%2fAdd.1&Lang=en
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/4/42/Add.1 from 21 August 2006 to 25 August 2006 20 February 2007 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination Honduras UNITED UNSPA/HRC/4/42/Add.1https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f4%2f42%2fAdd.1&Lang=en
X.Q.L. v. Australia
X.Q.L. v. Australia CAT/C/52/D/455/2011 Communication number s : 455/2011 Author: X.Q.L. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 52 Country Australia Submission date 03 Mar 2011 Date of decision 02 May 2014 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/52/D/455/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1828/en-US
X. v. Argentina
X. v. Argentina CRPD/C/11/D/8/2012 Communication number s : 008/2012 Author: X. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 16 Country Argentina Submission date 22 Jun 2012 Date of decision 11 Apr 2014 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCRPD/C/11/D/8/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1989/en-US
X v. Netherlands v. Netherlands
X v. Netherlands v. Netherlands CCPR/C/117/D/2729/2016 Communication number s : 2729/2016 Author: X Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 117 Country Netherlands Submission date 01 Feb 2016 Date of decision 14 Jul 2016 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/117/D/2729/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2127/en-US
X. v. Republic of Korea
X. v. Republic of Korea CCPR/C/110/D/1908/2009 Communication number s : 1908/2009 Author: X. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 110 Country Republic of Korea Submission date 19 Oct 2009 Date of decision 25 Mar 2014 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/110/D/1908/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1809/en-US
X v. Spain
X v. Spain CCPR/C/93/D/1456/2006 Communication number s : 1456/2006 Author: X Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 93 Country Spain Submission date 14 Feb 2006 Date of decision 24 Jul 2008 Comment: The texts of two individual opinions one JUTBCCPR/C/93/D/1456/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1448/en-US
Y.R. v. Russian Federation
Y.R. v. Russian Federation CAT/C/72/D/869/2018 Communication number s : 869/2018 Author: Y.R. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 72 Country Russian Federation Submission date 05 Dec 2017 Date of decision 12 Nov 2021 Comment: This JUTBCAT/C/72/D/869/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3351/en-US
Y. Sh. v. Russian Federation
Y. Sh. v. Russian Federation CCPR/C/128/D/2815/2016 Communication number s : 2815/2016 Author: Y. Sh. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 128 Country Russian Federation Submission date 15 Apr 2016 Date of decision 13 Mar 2020 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/128/D/2815/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2868/en-US
Y v. Canada
Y v. Canada CCPR/C/116/D/2314/2013 Communication number s : 2314/2013 Author: Y Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 116 Country Canada Submission date 06 Dec 2013 Date of decision 22 Mar 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCCPR/C/116/D/2314/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2177/en-US
Y v. Canada
Y v. Canada CCPR/C/116/D/2314/2013 Communication number s : 2314/2013 Author: Y Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 116 Country Canada Submission date Date of decision Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive issues: arbitrary JUTBCCPR/C/116/D/2314/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2133/en-US
YEMEN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
YEMEN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CRC/C/YEM/CO/4 NULL 2014 02 24T00:00:00 CRC United Nations CRC/C/YEM/CO/4 Convention on the Distr.: General 25 February 2014 Rights of the Child Original: English Committee on the Rights of the Child Concluding observations UHRICRC/C/YEM/CO/4https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/b989af21-e4c6-443b-9783-77884216cc8b
YEMEN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
YEMEN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS E/C.12/YEM/CO/3 NULL 2023 03 13T00:00:00 CESCR United Nations E/C.12/YEM/CO/3 Economic and Social Council Distr.: General 23 March 2023 Original: English Committee on Economic Social and Cultural Rights Concluding UHRIE/C.12/YEM/CO/3https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/7107bb20-0509-4a23-bfe4-02e5a99e8e2b
Youcif Almegaryaf and Hisham Matar (represented by TRIAL (Track Impunity Always)) v. Libya
Youcif Almegaryaf and Hisham Matar represented by TRIAL Track Impunity Always v. Libya CCPR/C/110/D/2006/2010 Communication number s : 2006/2010 Author: Youcif Almegaryaf and Hisham Matar represented by TRIAL Track Impunity Always Type of decision: JUTBCCPR/C/110/D/2006/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1815/en-US
Young-kwan Kim et al. v. Republic of Korea
Young kwan Kim et al. v. Republic of Korea CCPR/C/112/D/2179/2012 Communication number s : 2179/2012 Author: Young kwan Kim et al. represented by counsel Du Jin Oh Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 112 Country Republic of Korea Submission JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/2179/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1939/en-US