Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 30
11. Convention on the Rights of the Child
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 11. Convention on the Rights of the Child New York 20 November 1989 Entry into force : 2 September 1990 in accordance with article 49 1 . Registration : 2 September 1990 No. 27531 Status : UNIV-11https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-11&chapter=4&clang=_en
15. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 15. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities New York 13 December 2006 Entry into force : 3 May 2008 in accordance with article 45 1 . Registration : 3 May 2008 No. 44910 Status : UNIV-15https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-15&chapter=4&clang=_en
4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights New York 16 December 1966 Entry into force : 23 March 1976 in accordance with article 49 for all provisions except those of article 41 UNIV-4https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-4&chapter=4&clang=_en
A.H.G. v. Canada
A.H.G. v. Canada CCPR/C/113/D/2091/2011 Communication number s : 2091/2011 Author: A.H.G. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 113 Country Canada Submission date 28 Aug 2011 Date of decision 25 Mar 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/113/D/2091/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1926/en-US
A v. New Zealand
A v. New Zealand CCPR/C/66/D/754/1997 Communication number s : 754/1997 Author: A Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 66 Country New Zealand Submission date 19 Apr 1996 Date of decision 15 Jul 1999 Comment: Individual opinion submitted by JUTBCCPR/C/66/D/754/1997https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/802/en-US
Ahmad v. Denmark
Ahmad v. Denmark CERD/C/56/D/16/1999 Communication number s : 16/1999 Author: Kashif Ahmad Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 56 Country Denmark Submission date 28 May 1999 Date of decision 13 Mar 2000 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCERD/C/56/D/16/1999https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3025/en-US
Bagale v. Nepal
Bagale v. Nepal CCPR/C/130/D/2777/2016 Communication number s : 2777/2016 Author: Hom Bahadur Bagale Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 130 Country Nepal Submission date 17 Dec 2015 Date of decision 02 Nov 2020 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/130/D/2777/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3277/en-US
CASE OF ARMANI DA SILVA v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF ARMANI DA SILVA v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 5878/08 WISTRICH H. GBR 3/30/2016 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 2 Right to life Article 2 1 Effective investigation Procedural aspect Offences under the Health and Safety at Work ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0330JUD000587808https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-161975
CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 58170/13 62322/14 24960/15 CAREY D. CURLING R. NORTON E. GBR 9/13/2018 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Manifestly ill founded Violation of Article 8 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0913JUD005817013https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-186048
CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 58170/13 62322/14 24960/15 CAREY D. CURLING R. NORTON E. GBR 5/25/2021 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 34 Individual applications Art. 34 Victim Violation of Article 8 Right to ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0525JUD005817013https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-210077
CASE OF FAYED v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF FAYED v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 17101/90 N/A GBR 9/21/1994 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection rejected non exhaustion No violation of Art. 6 1 Not necessary to examine Art. 13 Companies Act 1985 Sections 432 para. 2 434 436 437 para. 3 c 14 128 445 7 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0921JUD001710190https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57890
CASE OF KYPRIANOU v. CYPRUS
CASE OF KYPRIANOU v. CYPRUS 73797/01 TRIANTAFYLLIDES M. CLERIDES C. EFSTATHIOU E. ANGELIDES A. VRAHIMI E. CLERIDES L. EMMERSON B. MULLER M. CYP 12/15/2005 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 1 Not necessary to examine Art. 6 2 Not necessary to examine Art. 6 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1215JUD007379701https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-71671
CASE OF LUSTIG-PREAN AND BECKETT v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF LUSTIG PREAN AND BECKETT v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 31417/96 32377/96 N/A GBR 9/27/1999 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 8 No separate issue under Art. 14 8 Just satisfaction reserved Army Act 1955 Air Force Act 1955 Naval Discipline Act 1957 Sexual ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0927JUD003141796https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58407
CASE OF MAKTOUF AND DAMJANOVIĆ v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA
CASE OF MAKTOUF AND DAMJANOVI v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA 2312/08 34179/08 LOZO A. MEHIC I. BIH 7/18/2013 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 7 No punishment without law Article 7 1 Heavier penalty Retroactivity Pecuniary damage claim ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0718JUD000231208https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-122716
CASE OF SMITH AND GRADY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF SMITH AND GRADY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 33985/96 33986/96 N/A GBR 9/27/1999 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 8 No separate issue under Art. 14 8 No violation of Art. 3 or 14 3 Not necessary to examine Art. 10 or 14 10 Violation of Art. 13 Just ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0927JUD003398596https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58408
CASE OF THE SUNDAY TIMES v. THE UNITED KINGDOM (No. 1)
CASE OF THE SUNDAY TIMES v. THE UNITED KINGDOM No. 1 6538/74 N/A GBR 4/26/1979 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 10 No violation of Art. 14 10 Not necessary to examine Art. 18 Just satisfaction reserved 149 148 201 316 265 379 343 100 232 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1979:0426JUD000653874https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57584
CASE OF UAB AMBERCORE DC AND UAB ARCUS NOVUS v. LITHUANIA
CASE OF UAB AMBERCORE DC AND UAB ARCUS NOVUS v. LITHUANIA 56774/18 SIMAITIS R. LTU 6/13/2023 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Ratione materiae No violation of Article 6 Right to a fair trial Article 6 Civil ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0613JUD005677418https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-225220
Elmi v. Australia
Elmi v. Australia CAT/C/22/D/120/1998 Communication number s : 120/1998 Author: Sadiq Shek Elmi Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 22 Country Australia Submission date 17 Nov 1998 Date of decision 14 May 1999 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/22/D/120/1998https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/260/en-US
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT DENMARK
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT DENMARK DNK 2014 03 28 2014 04 16 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY II. CONTEXT III. CORRUPTION GRECOGreco-Eval-IV-Rep-2013-6E-Final-Denmark-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-Eval-IV-Rep-2013-6E-Final-Denmark-PUBLIC
G. v. Australia
G. v. Australia CCPR/C/119/D/2172/2012 Communication number s : 2172/2012 Author: G. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 119 Country Australia Submission date 02 Dec 2011 Date of decision 17 Mar 2017 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/119/D/2172/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2220/en-US