Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 9 of 9
CASE OF ABU ZUBAYDAH v. LITHUANIA
CASE OF ABU ZUBAYDAH v. LITHUANIA 46454/11 DUFFY H. MICKUM IV G.B. MARGULIES J. LTU 5/31/2018 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 34 Individual applications Art. 34 Victim Preliminary objections joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0531JUD004645411https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-183687
CASE OF AL NASHIRI v. ROMANIA
CASE OF AL NASHIRI v. ROMANIA 33234/12 GOLDSTON J.A. SKILBECK R. SINGH A. HOLLANDER N. HATNEANU D.O. ROU 5/31/2018 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0531JUD003323412https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-183685
CASE OF HIRSI JAMAA AND OTHERS v. ITALY
CASE OF HIRSI JAMAA AND OTHERS v. ITALY 27765/09 LANA A. G. SACCUCCI A. ITA 2/23/2012 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections joined to merits and dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0223JUD002776509https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-109231
CASE OF HUSAYN (ABU ZUBAYDAH) v. POLAND
CASE OF HUSAYN ABU ZUBAYDAH v. POLAND 7511/13 HUGHES P. DUFFY H. VANDOVA V. MARGULIES J. MICKUM G.B. JANKOWSKI B. POL 7/24/2014 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0724JUD000751113https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-146047
CASE OF KENNEDY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF KENNEDY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 26839/05 MOLE N. GBR 5/18/2010 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed victim No violation of Art. 8 No violation of Art. 6 1 No violation of Art. 13 Section 7 1 of the Data Protection Act ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0518JUD002683905https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-98473
CASE OF MALONE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF MALONE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 8691/79 N/A GBR 8/2/1984 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 8 Not necessary to examine Art. 13 Just satisfaction reserved Post Office Act 1969 Section 80 451 429 424 203 319 268 329 333 444 110 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1984:0802JUD000869179https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57533
CASE OF RAMIREZ SANCHEZ v. FRANCE
CASE OF RAMIREZ SANCHEZ v. FRANCE 59450/00 COUTANT PEYRE Isabelle FRA 7/4/2006 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 3 Violation of Art. 13 Costs and expenses partial award Convention proceedings Articles D. 270 D. 272 D. 283 1 and D. 283 2 of the Code of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0704JUD005945000https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-76169
CASE OF SHAMAYEV AND OTHERS v. GEORGIA AND RUSSIA
CASE OF SHAMAYEV AND OTHERS v. GEORGIA AND RUSSIA 36378/02 MUKHASHAVRIA L. DZAMOUKACHVILI M. GEO RUS 4/12/2005 12:00:00 AM Government s preliminary objections dismissed No violation of Art. 2 as regards one applicant No violation of Art. 3 by Georgia as ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0412JUD003637802https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-68790
CASE OF TOMOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
CASE OF TOMOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA 18255/10 63058/10 10270/11 73227/11 56201/13 41234/16 MEZAK E. SHEVCHENKO A. RUS 4/9/2019 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Ratione materiae Violation of Article 38 Examination ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0409JUD001825510https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-192209