Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 3201 - 3220 of 3463
GREVIO’s (Baseline) Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence (Istanbul Convention) – CYPRUS
GREVIO s Baseline Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence Istanbul Convention CYPRUS CYP a43 2022 10 GREVIOGREVIO-Inf(2022)29_Cyprus_Baseline_Evaluation_Report_enghttps://hudoc.grevio.coe.int/eng?i=GREVIO-Inf(2022)29_Cyprus_Baseline_Evaluation_Report_eng
GREVIO’s (Baseline) Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence (Istanbul Convention) FRANCE
GREVIO s Baseline Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence Istanbul Convention FRANCE FRA a111a a19 a22 GREVIOGREVIO-Inf(2019)16_France_Baseline_Evaluation_Report_enghttps://hudoc.grevio.coe.int/eng?i=GREVIO-Inf(2019)16_France_Baseline_Evaluation_Report_eng
GREVIO’s (Baseline) Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence (Istanbul Convention) SPAIN
GREVIO s Baseline Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence Istanbul Convention SPAIN ESP a13 a27 a41 GREVIOGREVIO-Inf(2020)19_Spain_Baseline_Evaluation_report_enghttps://hudoc.grevio.coe.int/eng?i=GREVIO-Inf(2020)19_Spain_Baseline_Evaluation_report_eng
GREVIO’s (Baseline) Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence (Istanbul Convention) Slovenia
GREVIO s Baseline Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence Istanbul Convention Slovenia SVN exe 2021 06 GREVIOGREVIO_Inf_2021_7_Slovenia_Baseline_Evaluation_Report_enghttps://hudoc.grevio.coe.int/eng?i=GREVIO_Inf_2021_7_Slovenia_Baseline_Evaluation_Report_eng
GURBAN v. Turkey
GURBAN v. Turkey TUR 15/03/2016 00:00:00 10/11/2016 11:35:29 Case Description: This group of cases concern violations of the prohibition of torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment on account of the applicants sentences to aggravated life EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-36750
Gavrilin v. Belarus
Gavrilin v. Belarus CCPR/C/89/D/1342/2005 Communication number s : 1342/2005 Author: Maksim Gavrilin Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 89 Country Belarus Submission date 28 Oct 2004 Date of decision 28 Mar 2007 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/89/D/1342/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1348/en-US
Gemma Beasley v. Australia
Gemma Beasley v. Australia CRPD/C/15/D/11/2013 Communication number s : 011/2013 Author: Gemma Beasley Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 15 Country Australia Submission date 29 Apr 2013 Date of decision 01 Apr 2016 Comment: This document has JUTBCRPD/C/15/D/11/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2142/en-US
Gilberg v. Germany
Gilberg v. Germany CCPR/C/87/D/1403/2005 Communication number s : 1403/2005 Author: Erich Gilberg Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 87 Country Germany Submission date 11 Feb 2005 Date of decision 25 Jul 2006 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/87/D/1403/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1266/en-US
Government comments on the fourth report on Latvia
Government comments on the fourth report on Latvia LVA 2011 12 09 2012 02 21 Government comments on the report on LATVIA APPENDIX: GOVERNMENT S VIEWPOINT APPENDIXThe following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the ECRILVA-COM-IV-2012-003-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=LVA-COM-IV-2012-003-ENG
Groupe d’Intérêt pour le Matronyme v. France
Groupe d Int r t pour le Matronyme v. France CEDAW/C/44/D/12/2007 Communication number s : 012/2007 Author: Groupe d Int r t pour le Matronyme Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 44 Country France Submission date 26 May 2006 Date of JUTBCEDAW/C/44/D/12/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1709/en-US
Gurbanova and Muradhasilova v. Azerbaijan
Gurbanova and Muradhasilova v. Azerbaijan CCPR/C/131/D/2952/2017 Communication number s : 2952/2017 Author: Matanat Baliyar Gizi Gurbanova and Saadat Baliyar Gizi Muradhasilova Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 131 Country Azerbaijan JUTBCCPR/C/131/D/2952/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3249/en-US
H.B. v. Spain
H.B. v. Spain CRC/C/83/D/25/2017 Communication number s : 025/2017 Author: H.B. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 83 Country Spain Submission date 12 Jul 2017 Date of decision 07 Feb 2020 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCRC/C/83/D/25/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2942/en-US
Hagan v. Australia
Hagan v. Australia CERD/C/62/D/26/2002 Communication number s : 026/2002 Author: Stephen Hagan Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 62 Country Australia Submission date 31 Jul 2002 Date of decision 20 Mar 2003 Comment: This document has no JUTBCERD/C/62/D/26/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1745/en-US
Hashemi and Hashemi v. Netherlands
Hashemi and Hashemi v. Netherlands CCPR/C/125/D/2489/2014 Communication number s : 2489/2014 Author: Jamshed Hashemi and Maryam Hashemi Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 125 Country Netherlands Submission date 19 Jul 2013 Date of decision 26 JUTBCCPR/C/125/D/2489/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3321/en-US
Hebbadj v. France
Hebbadj v. France CCPR/C/123/D/2807/2016 Communication number s : 2807/2016 Author: Miriana Hebbadj Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 123 Country France Submission date 03 Mar 2016 Date of decision 17 Jul 2018 Comment: Joint opinion of JUTBCCPR/C/123/D/2807/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3541/en-US
Henley v. Australia
Henley v. Australia CRPD/C/27/D/56/2018 Communication number s : 56/2018 Author: Lauren Henley Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 27 Country Australia Submission date 03 Oct 2018 Date of decision 26 Aug 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCRPD/C/27/D/56/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3608/en-US
Hermansen, Edrich and Vilstrup v. Denmark
Hermansen Edrich and Vilstrup v. Denmark CERD/C/77/D/44/2009 Communication number s : 044/2009 Author: Nicolai Hermansen Signe Edrich and Jonna Vilstrup Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 77 Country Denmark Submission date 25 Feb 2009 JUTBCERD/C/77/D/44/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1725/en-US
Hertzberg et al. v. Finland
Hertzberg et al. v. Finland CCPR/C/15/D/61/1979 Communication number s : 061/1979 Author: Leo R. Hertzberg Ulf Mansson Astrid Nikula and Marko Tuovi Putkonen Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 15 Country Finland Submission date 07 Aug 1979 JUTBCCPR/C/15/D/61/1979https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/337/en-US
Hidalgo Rea v. Mexico
Hidalgo Rea v. Mexico CCPR/C/131/D/3259/2018 Communication number s : 3259/2018 Author: Irma Leticia Hidalgo Rea Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 131 Country Mexico Submission date 15 Jan 2018 Date of decision 25 Mar 2021 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/131/D/3259/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3227/en-US
I.A.O. v. Sweden
I.A.O. v. Sweden CAT/C/20/D/65/1997 Communication number s : 065/1997 Author: I.A.O. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 20 Country Sweden Submission date 21 Mar 1997 Date of decision 06 May 1998 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/20/D/65/1997https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/248/en-US