Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 2381 - 2400 of 2413
X and Y v. Georgia
X and Y v. Georgia CEDAW/C/61/D/24/2009 Communication number s : 024/2009 Author: X and Y Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 61 Country Georgia Submission date 24 Jun 2009 Date of decision 13 Jul 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/61/D/24/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2051/en-US
X and Y v. Netherlands
X and Y v. Netherlands CAT/C/15/D/31/1995 Communication number s : 031/1995 Author: X and Y Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 15 Country Netherlands Submission date 19 Sep 1995 Date of decision 20 Nov 1995 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/15/D/31/1995https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/224/en-US
X. and Y. v. Russian Federation
X. and Y. v. Russian Federation CEDAW/C/73/D/100/2016 Communication number s : 100/2016 Author: X. and Y. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 73 Country Russian Federation Submission date 29 Dec 2015 Date of decision 16 Jul 2019 Comment: This JUTBCEDAW/C/73/D/100/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2658/en-US
X and Y v. Switzerland
X and Y v. Switzerland CAT/C/66/D/776/2016 Communication number s : 776/2016 Author: X and Y represented by counsel Marcel Zirngast Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 66 Country Switzerland Submission date 19 Oct 2016 Date of decision 23 Apr JUTBCAT/C/66/D/776/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2581/en-US
X and Y v. Switzerland
X and Y v. Switzerland CAT/C/75/D/1081/2021 Communication number s : 1081/2021 Author: X and Y Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 75 Country Switzerland Submission date 10 Jun 2021 Date of decision 11 Nov 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/75/D/1081/2021https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3613/en-US
X. v. Austria
X. v. Austria CEDAW/C/64/D/67/2014 Communication number s : 067/2014 Author: X. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 64 Country Austria Submission date 15 Nov 2013 Date of decision 11 Jul 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/64/D/67/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2108/en-US
X v. Colombia
X v. Colombia CCPR/C/89/D/1361/2005 Communication number s : 1361/2005 Author: X Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 89 Country Colombia Submission date 13 Jan 2001 Date of decision 30 Mar 2007 Comment: An individual opinion co signed by JUTBCCPR/C/89/D/1361/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1338/en-US
X. v. Denmark
X. v. Denmark CCPR/C/110/D/2007/2010 Communication number s : 2007/2010 Author: X. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 110 Country Denmark Submission date 23 Nov 2010 Date of decision 26 Mar 2014 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/110/D/2007/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1816/en-US
X v. Netherlands
X v. Netherlands CAT/C/68/D/863/2018 Communication number s : 863/2018 Author: X represented by counsel Igna Oomen Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 68 Country Netherlands Submission date 12 Jan 2018 Date of decision 05 Dec 2019 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/68/D/863/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2700/en-US
X. v. Sri Lanka
X. v. Sri Lanka CCPR/C/120/D/2256/2013 Communication number s : 2256/2013 Author: X. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 120 Country Sri Lanka Submission date 11 Feb 2013 Date of decision 27 Jul 2017 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/120/D/2256/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2344/en-US
X v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
X v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia MKD 17/04/2019 00:00:00 04/07/2019 17:16:59 Case Description: The case concerns a violation of the transgender applicant s right to respect for his private life on account of the absence of quick transparent EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52421
Y.B. and N.S. v. Belgium
Y.B. and N.S. v. Belgium CRC/C/79/D/12/2017 Communication number s : 012/2017 Author: Y.B. and N.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 79 Country Belgium Submission date 22 Mar 2017 Date of decision 27 Sep 2018 Comment: This document has no JUTBCRC/C/79/D/12/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2421/en-US
Y.C. v. Denmark
Y.C. v. Denmark CEDAW/C/59/D/59/2013 Communication number s : 059/2013 Author: Y.C. represented by counsel City Advokaterne Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 59 Country Denmark Submission date 16 Jan 2013 Date of decision 24 Oct 2014 JUTBCEDAW/C/59/D/59/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1882/en-US
Y.F. v. Panama
Y.F. v. Panama CRC/C/83/D/48/2018 Communication number s : 048/2018 Author: Y.F. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 83 Country Panama Submission date 21 Jun 2018 Date of decision 03 Feb 2020 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCRC/C/83/D/48/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2630/en-US
Y.G.H. et al v. Australia
Y.G.H. et al v. Australia CAT/C/51/D/434/2010 Communication number s : 434/2010 Author: Y.G.H. et al Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 51 Country Australia Submission date 24 Oct 2010 Date of decision 14 Nov 2013 Comment: This document has JUTBCAT/C/51/D/434/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/7/en-US
Y v. Denmark
Y v. Denmark CCPR/C/136/D/2774/2016 Communication number s : 2774/2016 Author: Y Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 136 Country Denmark Submission date 28 Aug 2015 Date of decision 04 Nov 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/136/D/2774/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3493/en-US
YEMEN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
YEMEN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CRC/C/YEM/CO/4 NULL 2014 02 24T00:00:00 CRC United Nations CRC/C/YEM/CO/4 Convention on the Distr.: General 25 February 2014 Rights of the Child Original: English Committee on the Rights of the Child Concluding observations UHRICRC/C/YEM/CO/4https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/b989af21-e4c6-443b-9783-77884216cc8b
Young v. Australia
Young v. Australia CCPR/C/78/D/941/2000 Communication number s : 941/2000 Author: Edward Young Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 78 Country Australia Submission date 29 Jun 1999 Date of decision 06 Aug 2003 Comment: Committee members Ruth JUTBCCPR/C/78/D/941/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1076/en-US
Z.A.H. v. Canada
Z.A.H. v. Canada CAT/C/61/D/687/2015 Communication number s : 687/2015 Author: Z.A.H. represented by counsel Rajwinder S. Bhambi Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 61 Country Canada Submission date 22 Jun 2015 Date of decision 11 Aug JUTBCAT/C/61/D/687/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2284/en-US
Z.H. v. Australia
Z.H. v. Australia CCPR/C/107/D/1957/2010 Communication number s : 1957/2010 Author: Z.H. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 107 Country Australia Submission date 14 Jul 2010 Date of decision 21 Mar 2013 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/107/D/1957/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1652/en-US