Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 341 - 360 of 14905
BEKIR-OUSTA AND OTHERS v. Greece
BEKIR OUSTA AND OTHERS v. Greece GRC 11/01/2008 00:00:00 04/11/2016 16:42:14 Case Description: These cases concern violations of the right to freedom of association Article 11 due to the domestic courts rulings not to register associations Bekir Ousta and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-15567
BELES AND OTHERS v. the Czech Republic
BELES AND OTHERS v. the Czech Republic CZE 12/02/2003 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:27:14 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Refusal to consider the merits of the applicants claims and appeals due to a restrictive interpretation of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6072
BELLER v. Poland
BELLER v. Poland POL 06/06/2005 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:10:55 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the excessive length of proceedings before administrative courts and bodies violations of Article 6 1 . The case of Wcis o and Cabaj also concerns EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17662
BENEFICIO CAPPELLA PAOLINI v. San Marino
BENEFICIO CAPPELLA PAOLINI v. San Marino SMR 13/10/2004 00:00:00 02/11/2016 17:40:06 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of property: Excessive length of proceedings concerning the partial restitution of land EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-11180
BEZYMYANNAYA v. Russia
BEZYMYANNAYA v. Russia RUS 22/03/2010 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:03:34 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of access to a court due to the fact that domestic courts declines their jurisdiction to hear the applicant s claim EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-27724
BLUMBERGA v. Latvia
BLUMBERGA v. Latvia LVA 14/01/2009 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:49 Case Description: Lack of access to a court: Refusal of courts to examine the merits of civil claims on the ground that the due amount of a court fee due had not been paid and partial EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31098
BOCHAN v. Ukraine (No. 2)
BOCHAN v. Ukraine No. 2 UKR 05/02/2015 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Unfair civil and criminal review proceedings before the Supreme Court following initial judgments of the European Court Bochan No. 1 Yaremenko EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31248
BORIS STOJANOVSKI v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
BORIS STOJANOVSKI v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia MKD 06/08/2010 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:31:05 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of access to a court due to the lack of decision on the merits in respect EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6616
BOZZA v. Italy
BOZZA v. Italy ITA 14/12/2017 00:00:00 12/01/2018 10:16:53 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Failure in the procedural context of the Pinto remedy to take the execution stage of proceedings into account when determining EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48591
BULENA v. the Czech Republic
BULENA v. the Czech Republic CZE 20/07/2004 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:27:14 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of access to the Constitutional Court due to its excessively formal interpretation of the admissibility rules. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6120
BULFRACHT LTD v. Croatia
BULFRACHT LTD v. Croatia HRV 21/09/2011 00:00:00 03/11/2016 16:22:41 Case Description: Denial of access to a court: Supreme Court refused to examine the merits of a company s appeal on points of law on the ratione valoris ground Status of Execution: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12461
BULINWAR OOD AND HRUSANOV v. Bulgaria
BULINWAR OOD AND HRUSANOV v. Bulgaria BGR 12/07/2007 00:00:00 04/11/2016 14:50:56 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Infringement of the applicant company s right of access to a court to challenge the refusal by a state EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14723
BUTURUGA v. Romania
BUTURUGA v. Romania ROU 11/06/2020 00:00:00 21/07/2020 14:49:16 Case Description: The case concerns the lack of an effective investigation into the applicant s allegations of domestic violence and of violation of the confidentiality of electronic EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55605
BUZOIANU v. Romania
BUZOIANU v. Romania ROU 02/11/2021 00:00:00 05/11/2021 13:57:21 Case Description: This case concerns the impossibility for the applicant to challenge effectively the Parliament s decision in 2012 to terminate his service as a member and president of a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58797
Baban v. Australia
Baban v. Australia CCPR/C/78/D/1014/2001 Communication number s : 1014/2001 Author: Omar Sharif Baban Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 78 Country Australia Submission date 19 Dec 2000 Date of decision 06 Aug 2003 Comment: Under rule 86 of JUTBCCPR/C/78/D/1014/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1057/en-US
Babkin v. Russian Federation
Babkin v. Russian Federation CCPR/C/92/D/1310/2004 Communication number s : 1310/2004 Author: Konstantin Babkin Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 92 Country Russian Federation Submission date 05 Jan 2004 Date of decision 03 Apr 2008 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/92/D/1310/2004https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1410/en-US
Baboeram-Adhin et al. v. Suriname
Baboeram Adhin et al. v. Suriname CCPR/C/24/D/146/1983 Communication number s : 154/1983 148/1983 146/1983 Author: Kanta Baboeram Adhin on behalf of her deceased husband Johnny Kamperveen on behalf of his deceased father Jenny Jamila Rehnuma Karamat Ali JUTBCCPR/C/24/D/146/1983https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/348/en-US
Bacher v. Austria
Bacher v. Austria CRPD/C/19/D/26/2014 Communication number s : 026/2014 Author: Viktoria Bacher Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 20 Country Austria Submission date 08 Feb 2014 Date of decision 16 Feb 2018 Comment: This document has no JUTBCRPD/C/19/D/26/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2394/en-US
Bagale v. Nepal
Bagale v. Nepal CCPR/C/130/D/2777/2016 Communication number s : 2777/2016 Author: Hom Bahadur Bagale Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 130 Country Nepal Submission date 17 Dec 2015 Date of decision 02 Nov 2020 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/130/D/2777/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3277/en-US
Bahadur Maharjan v. Nepal
Bahadur Maharjan v. Nepal CCPR/C/105/D/1863/2009 Communication number s : 1863/2009 Author: Dev Bahadur Maharjan Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 105 Country Nepal Submission date 31 Dec 2008 Date of decision 19 Jul 2012 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/105/D/1863/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1238/en-US