Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 5601 - 5620 of 5648
Y. v. Canada,Sri Lanka
Y. v. Canada Sri Lanka CCPR/C/114/D/2280/2013 Communication number s : 2280/2013 Author: Y. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 114 Country Canada Sri Lanka Submission date 29 Jul 2013 Date of decision 22 Jul 2015 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/114/D/2280/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1995/en-US
Y v. Switzerland
Y v. Switzerland CAT/C/72/D/916/2019 Communication number s : 916/2019 Author: Y Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 72 Country Switzerland Submission date 21 Feb 2019 Date of decision 12 Nov 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/72/D/916/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3352/en-US
YAGIZ AND OTHERS v. Turkey
YAGIZ AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 22/02/2006 00:00:00 09/11/2016 17:24:27 Case Description: This case mainly concerns a violation of the right to a fair trial by an independent and impartial court on account of the presence of a military judge on the bench EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-36037
YAKOVENKO v. Ukraine
YAKOVENKO v. Ukraine UKR 25/01/2008 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: These cases mainly concern inhuman and/or degrading treatment due to overcrowding poor material conditions and inadequate nutrition in police establishments pre trial EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31204
YALCIN KUCUK v. Turkey (no. 2)
YALCIN KUCUK v. Turkey no. 2 TUR 02/03/2006 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:21:37 Case Description: Freedom of expression and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Allegedly unjustified interference on account of criminal proceedings against the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-30084
YALCIN v. Turkey
YALCIN v. Turkey TUR 24/06/2003 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:10:46 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to the lack of independence and impartiality of State Security Courts. Article 6 1 Status of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28571
YAVUZ SELIM GULER v. Turkey
YAVUZ SELIM GULER v. Turkey TUR 15/03/2016 00:00:00 10/11/2016 11:45:12 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Administrative restrictions and room confinement imposed as a disciplinary sanction by the applicant s military superior and not EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-36832
YEMEN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
YEMEN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CRC/C/YEM/CO/4 NULL 2014 02 24T00:00:00 CRC United Nations CRC/C/YEM/CO/4 Convention on the Distr.: General 25 February 2014 Rights of the Child Original: English Committee on the Rights of the Child Concluding observations UHRICRC/C/YEM/CO/4https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/b989af21-e4c6-443b-9783-77884216cc8b
YEMEN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
YEMEN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS E/C.12/YEM/CO/3 NULL 2023 03 13T00:00:00 CESCR United Nations E/C.12/YEM/CO/3 Economic and Social Council Distr.: General 23 March 2023 Original: English Committee on Economic Social and Cultural Rights Concluding UHRIE/C.12/YEM/CO/3https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/7107bb20-0509-4a23-bfe4-02e5a99e8e2b
YILMAZ AND KILIC v. Turkey
YILMAZ AND KILIC v. Turkey TUR 17/10/2008 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:21:37 Case Description: Freedom of expression and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Conviction for having participated in a demonstration to protest against the arrest of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-30398
Yoon and Choi v. Republic of Korea
Yoon and Choi v. Republic of Korea CCPR/C/88/D/1321 1322/2004 Communication number s : 1322/2004 1321/2004 Author: Yeo Bum Yoon and Myung Jin Choi Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 88 Country Republic of Korea Submission date 18 Oct 2004 JUTBCCPR/C/88/D/1321-1322/2004https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1323/en-US
Youcif Almegaryaf and Hisham Matar (represented by TRIAL (Track Impunity Always)) v. Libya
Youcif Almegaryaf and Hisham Matar represented by TRIAL Track Impunity Always v. Libya CCPR/C/110/D/2006/2010 Communication number s : 2006/2010 Author: Youcif Almegaryaf and Hisham Matar represented by TRIAL Track Impunity Always Type of decision: JUTBCCPR/C/110/D/2006/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1815/en-US
Young-kwan Kim et al. v. Republic of Korea
Young kwan Kim et al. v. Republic of Korea CCPR/C/112/D/2179/2012 Communication number s : 2179/2012 Author: Young kwan Kim et al. represented by counsel Du Jin Oh Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 112 Country Republic of Korea Submission JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/2179/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1939/en-US
Young v. Australia
Young v. Australia CCPR/C/78/D/941/2000 Communication number s : 941/2000 Author: Edward Young Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 78 Country Australia Submission date 29 Jun 1999 Date of decision 06 Aug 2003 Comment: Committee members Ruth JUTBCCPR/C/78/D/941/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1076/en-US
Yrusta v. Argentina
Yrusta v. Argentina CED/C/10/D/1/2013 Communication number s : 001/2013 Author: Estela Deolinda Yrusta Alejandra del Valle Yrusta Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 10 Country Argentina Submission date 11 Sep 2013 Date of decision 11 Mar 2016 JUTBCED/C/10/D/1/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2141/en-US
Yurich v. Chile
Yurich v. Chile CCPR/C/85/D/1078/2002 Communication number s : 1078/2002 Author: Norma Yurich Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 85 Country Chile Submission date 10 Jul 2001 Date of decision 02 Nov 2005 Comment: The text of an JUTBCCPR/C/85/D/1078/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1233/en-US
Z.K. and A.K. v. Switzerland
Z.K. and A.K. v. Switzerland CAT/C/63/D/698/2015 Communication number s : 698/2015 Author: Z.K. and A.K. represented by counsel Stephanie Motz Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 63 Country Switzerland Submission date 20 Aug 2015 Date of JUTBCAT/C/63/D/698/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2722/en-US
Z. K. v. Azerbaijan,Sweden
Z. K. v. Azerbaijan Sweden CAT/C/40/D/301/2006 Communication number s : 301/2006 Author: Z. K. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 40 Country Azerbaijan Sweden Submission date 22 Aug 2006 Date of decision 09 May 2008 Comment: This document has JUTBCAT/C/40/D/301/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/80/en-US
Z.T. v. Australia
Z.T. v. Australia CAT/C/31/D/153/2000 Communication number s : 153/2000 Author: Z.T. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 31 Country Australia Submission date 04 Jan 2000 Date of decision 11 Nov 2003 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/31/D/153/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/160/en-US
Z.T. v. Norway
Z.T. v. Norway CAT/C/23/D/127/1999 Communication number s : 127/1999 Author: Z.T. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 23 Country Norway Submission date 25 Jan 1998 Date of decision 19 Nov 1999 Comment: Under rule 108 paragraph 9 of the JUTBCAT/C/23/D/127/1999https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/220/en-US