Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 141 - 160 of 9322
B.K. v. Norway
B.K. v. Norway CAT/C/62/D/722/2015 Communication number s : 722/2015 Author: B.K. not represented by counsel Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 62 Country Norway Submission date 21 Dec 2015 Date of decision 04 Dec 2017 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/62/D/722/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2414/en-US
B.M.I. and N.A.K. v. Denmark
B.M.I. and N.A.K. v. Denmark CCPR/C/118/D/2569/2015 Communication number s : 2569/2015 Author: B.M.I. and N.A.K. represented by counsel Hannah Krog Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 118 Country Denmark Submission date 06 Feb 2015 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/118/D/2569/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2229/en-US
B.M.S. v. Sweden
B.M.S. v. Sweden CAT/C/56/D/594/2014 Communication number s : 594/2014 Author: B.M.S. not represented by counsel Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 56 Country Sweden Submission date 09 Feb 2014 Date of decision 25 Nov 2015 Comment: Non JUTBCAT/C/56/D/594/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2079/en-US
B.M.S. v. Sweden
B.M.S. v. Sweden CAT/C/49/D/437/2010 Communication number s : 437/2010 Author: B.M.S. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 49 Country Sweden Submission date 10 Aug 2010 Date of decision 12 Nov 2012 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/49/D/437/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/17/en-US
B.N.T.K. v. Sweden
B.N.T.K. v. Sweden CAT/C/64/D/641/2014 Communication number s : 641/2014 Author: B.N.T.K. represented by counsel Mai Greitz Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 64 Country Sweden Submission date 01 Dec 2014 Date of decision 09 Aug 2018 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/64/D/641/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2456/en-US
B.S.S. v. Canada
B.S.S. v. Canada CAT/C/32/D/183/2001 Communication number s : 183/2001 Author: B.S.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 32 Country Canada Submission date 07 Mar 2001 Date of decision 12 May 2004 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/32/D/183/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/149/en-US
B.S. v. Austria
B.S. v. Austria CAT/C/75/D/1118/2022 Communication number s : 1118/2022 Author: B.S. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 75 Country Austria Submission date 08 Dec 2021 Date of decision 04 Nov 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/75/D/1118/2022https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3619/en-US
B.S. v. Canada
B.S. v. Canada CAT/C/27/D/166/2000 Communication number s : 166/2000 Author: B.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 27 Country Canada Submission date 22 Apr 1999 Date of decision 14 Nov 2001 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCAT/C/27/D/166/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/178/en-US
B.W.M.Z. v. Netherlands
B.W.M.Z. v. Netherlands CCPR/C/107/D/1788/2008 Communication number s : 1788/2008 Author: B.W.M.Z. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 107 Country Netherlands Submission date 26 Jun 2007 Date of decision 25 Mar 2013 Comment: Pursuant to JUTBCCPR/C/107/D/1788/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1331/en-US
B.Z. et al. v. Albania
B.Z. et al. v. Albania CCPR/C/121/D/2837/2016 Communication number s : 2837/2016 Author: B.Z. et al. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 121 Country Albania Submission date 13 Jan 2016 Date of decision 08 Nov 2017 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/121/D/2837/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2362/en-US
BAUCHER v. France
BAUCHER v. France FRA 24/10/2007 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:16:17 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings and breach of the rights of defence due to impossibility to obtain disclosure of the reasons for a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33183
BEIZARAS AND LEVICKAS v. Lithuania
BEIZARAS AND LEVICKAS v. Lithuania LTU 14/05/2020 00:00:00 12/06/2020 16:56:20 Case Description: This case concerns the refusal of the law enforcement agencies due to their discriminatory attitudes to launch an investigation into the applicants EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55375
BENIN : OBSERVATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE STATE PARTY
BENIN : OBSERVATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE STATE PARTY CAT/OP/BEN/3 NULL 2018 10 01T00:00:00 SPT United Nations CAT/OP/BEN/3 Optional Protocol to the Distr.: General Convention against Torture 1 October 2018 English and Other Cruel Inhuman Original: UHRICAT/OP/BEN/3https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/4f5f2925-7602-430e-8b53-d01b5cd06b4d
BERKOVICH AND OTHERS v. Russia
BERKOVICH AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 27/06/2018 00:00:00 27/07/2018 11:01:47 Case Description: This case concerns the restrictions imposed in 2005 2013 on the right to travel abroad on account of the authorities refusal to issue travel passports after EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49913
BHUTAN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
BHUTAN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CRC/C/BTN/CO/3 5 NULL 2017 07 05T00:00:00 CRC United Nations CRC/C/BTN/CO/3 5 Convention on the Distr.: General 5 July 2017 Rights of the Child Original: English Committee on the Rights of the Child Concluding observations UHRICRC/C/BTN/CO/3-5https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/df4d742f-eec1-4603-a66c-91218d28ed3f
BOLIVIA : OBSERVATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ADDRESSED TO THE STATE PARTY
BOLIVIA : OBSERVATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ADDRESSED TO THE STATE PARTY CAT/OP/BOL/3 NULL 2018 07 24T00:00:00 SPT United Nations CAT/OP/BOL/3 Optional Protocol to the Distr.: General Convention against Torture 24 July 2018 English and Other Cruel Inhuman UHRICAT/OP/BOL/3https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/aacac74c-f65f-4e75-9cba-b614550a2d14
BOTOYAN v. Armenia
BOTOYAN v. Armenia ARM 08/05/2022 00:00:00 20/05/2022 13:17:17 Case Description: This group of two cases concerns the lack of effective criminal investigation related to the medical malpractice. It also concerns lack of effective civil or administrative EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-60315
BULGARIA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
BULGARIA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CAT/C/BGR/CO/6 NULL 2017 12 15T00:00:00 CAT Concluding observations on the sixth periodic report of Bulgaria 1.The Committee against Torture considered the sixth periodic report of Bulgaria CAT/C/BGR/6 at its 1590th and UHRICAT/C/BGR/CO/6https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/85155f68-8c3c-49d7-94fe-81e98102d7b3
BULGARIA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS COMBINED FOURTH TO SEVENTH PERIODIC REPORT
BULGARIA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS COMBINED FOURTH TO SEVENTH PERIODIC REPORT CEDAW/C/BGR/CO/4 7 NULL 2012 08 07T00:00:00 CEDAW United Nations CEDAW/C/BGR/CO/4 7 Convention on the Elimination Distr.: General of All Forms of Discrimination 7 August 2012 UHRICEDAW/C/BGR/CO/4-7https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/83be0e3b-666e-4ee9-a4fe-7cb7e8b4db70
Baban v. Australia
Baban v. Australia CCPR/C/78/D/1014/2001 Communication number s : 1014/2001 Author: Omar Sharif Baban Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 78 Country Australia Submission date 19 Dec 2000 Date of decision 06 Aug 2003 Comment: Under rule 86 of JUTBCCPR/C/78/D/1014/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1057/en-US