Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1281 - 1300 of 1997
GREVIO’s (Baseline) Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence (Istanbul Convention) Slovenia
GREVIO s Baseline Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence Istanbul Convention Slovenia SVN exe 2021 06 GREVIOGREVIO_Inf_2021_7_Slovenia_Baseline_Evaluation_Report_enghttps://hudoc.grevio.coe.int/eng?i=GREVIO_Inf_2021_7_Slovenia_Baseline_Evaluation_Report_eng
Gallardo Martínez et al. v. Mexico
Gallardo Mart nez et al. v. Mexico CAT/C/72/D/992/2020 Communication number s : 992/2020 Author: Dami n Gallardo Mart nez on his own behalf and on that of his four minor children Yolanda Barranco Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 72 Country JUTBCAT/C/72/D/992/2020https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3340/en-US
Gallego Díaz v. Spain
Gallego D az v. Spain CCPR/C/82/D/988/2001 Communication number s : 988/2001 Author: Mariano Gallego D az Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 82 Country Spain Submission date 28 Oct 1999 Date of decision 03 Nov 2004 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/82/D/988/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1127/en-US
Giri v. Nepal
Giri v. Nepal CCPR/C/101/D/1761/2008 Communication number s : 1761/2008 Author: Yubraj Giri Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 101 Country Nepal Submission date 14 Jan 2008 Date of decision 24 Mar 2011 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/101/D/1761/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1664/en-US
Government comments on the fourth report on Portugal
Government comments on the fourth report on Portugal PRT 2013 03 21 2013 07 09 APPENDIX: GOVERNMENT S VIEWPOINT The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Portugal ECRI in accordance with its ECRIPRT-COM-IV-2013-020-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=PRT-COM-IV-2013-020-ENG
Government comments on the fourth report on the United Kingdom
Government comments on the fourth report on the United Kingdom GBR 2009 01 17 2010 03 02 Government comments on the report on THE UNITED KINGDOM APPENDIX: GOVERNMENT S VIEWPOINT APPENDIXThe following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and ECRIGBR-COM-IV-2010-004-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=GBR-COM-IV-2010-004-ENG
Government comments on the sixth report on Greece
Government comments on the sixth report on Greece GRC 2022 06 28 2022 09 22 APPENDIX: GOVERNMENT S VIEWPOINT The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Greece ECRI in accordance with its country ECRIGRC-COM-VI-2022-028-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=GRC-COM-VI-2022-028-ENG
Grainne Sherlock v. Australia
Grainne Sherlock v. Australia CRPD/C/24/D/20/2014 Communication number s : 20/2014 Author: Grainne Sherlock Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 24 Country Australia Submission date 24 Feb 2014 Date of decision 19 Mar 2021 Comment: This JUTBCRPD/C/24/D/20/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3069/en-US
Grioua v. Algeria
Grioua v. Algeria CCPR/C/90/D/1327/2004 Communication number s : 1327/2004 Author: Messaouda Grioua n e Atamna Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 90 Country Algeria Submission date 07 Oct 2004 Date of decision 10 Jul 2007 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/90/D/1327/2004https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1367/en-US
Guengueng et al. v. Senegal
Guengueng et al. v. Senegal CAT/C/36/D/181/2001 Communication number s : 181/2001 Author: Suleymane Guengueng et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 36 Country Senegal Submission date 18 Apr 2001 Date of decision 17 May 2006 Comment: In JUTBCAT/C/36/D/181/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/116/en-US
H.A. v. Denmark
H.A. v. Denmark CCPR/C/123/D/2328/2014 Communication number s : 2328/2014 Author: H.A. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 123 Country Denmark Submission date 06 Jan 2014 Date of decision 09 Jul 2018 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/123/D/2328/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2493/en-US
H.A. v. Sweden
H.A. v. Sweden CAT/C/63/D/744/2016 Communication number s : 744/2016 Author: H.A. represented by counsel Viktoria Nystr m Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 63 Country Sweden Submission date 08 Apr 2016 Date of decision 11 May 2018 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/63/D/744/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2737/en-US
H.B. v. Spain
H.B. v. Spain CRC/C/83/D/25/2017 Communication number s : 025/2017 Author: H.B. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 83 Country Spain Submission date 12 Jul 2017 Date of decision 07 Feb 2020 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCRC/C/83/D/25/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2942/en-US
H.O. v. Sweden
H.O. v. Sweden CAT/C/27/D/178/2001 Communication number s : 178/2001 Author: H.O. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 27 Country Sweden Submission date 11 Jan 2001 Date of decision 13 Nov 2001 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCAT/C/27/D/178/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/179/en-US
HUNGARY: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
HUNGARY: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CRPD/C/HUN/CO/2 3 NULL 2022 05 20T00:00:00 CRPD United Nations CRPD/C/HUN/CO/2 3 Convention on the Rights Distr.: General 20 May 2022 of Persons with Disabilities Original: English Committee on the Rights of Persons with UHRICRPD/C/HUN/CO/2-3https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/44a75482-2deb-4828-aac9-414429d5bdc0
Hebbadj v. France
Hebbadj v. France CCPR/C/123/D/2807/2016 Communication number s : 2807/2016 Author: Miriana Hebbadj Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 123 Country France Submission date 03 Mar 2016 Date of decision 17 Jul 2018 Comment: Joint opinion of JUTBCCPR/C/123/D/2807/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3541/en-US
Hew Raymond Griffiths v. Australia
Hew Raymond Griffiths v. Australia CCPR/C/112/D/1973/2010 Communication number s : 1973/2010 Author: Hew Raymond Griffiths represented by counsels Joanna Mansfield and Nicolas Patrick Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 112 Country Australia JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/1973/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1893/en-US
Human Rights Council adopts Universal Periodic Review outcome of Bosnia and Herzegovina, holds debate on the International Decade for People of African Descent, and suspends its forty-third session
Council Extends All Mandates and Mandated Activities that would otherwise Expire and Appoints 19 Special Procedure Mandate Holders The Human Rights Council this morning adopted the Universal Periodic Review outcome of Bosnia and Herzegovina and held a UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2020/03/human-rights-council-adopts-universal-periodic-review-outcome-bosnia-and
Human Rights Council adopts outcome of Universal Periodic Review of Kazakhstan, Slovenia and Bolivia
Human Rights Council AFTERNOON 9 June 2010 The Human Rights Council this afternoon adopted the outcome of the Universal Periodic Review of Kazakhstan Slovenia and Bolivia. Marat Beketayev Executive Secretary of the Ministry of Justice of Kazakhstan said UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2010/06/human-rights-council-adopts-outcome-universal-periodic-review-kazakhstan
Human Rights Council adopts outcome of Universal Periodic Review of Kazakhstan, Slovenia and Bolivia
Human Rights Council AFTERNOON 9 June 2010 The Human Rights Council this afternoon adopted the outcome of the Universal Periodic Review of Kazakhstan Slovenia and Bolivia. Marat Beketayev Executive Secretary of the Ministry of Justice of Kazakhstan said UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/2010/06/human-rights-council-adopts-outcome-universal-periodic-review-kazakhstan-slovenia-and