Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 41 - 60 of 7453
A.S. v. Denmark
A.S. v. Denmark CEDAW/C/69/D/80/2015 Communication number s : 080/2015 Author: A.S. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 69 Country Denmark Submission date 28 Jan 2015 Date of decision 26 Feb 2018 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/69/D/80/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2636/en-US
A.S. v. Denmark
A.S. v. Denmark CRC/C/82/D/36/2017 Communication number s : 036/2017 Author: A.S. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 82 Country Denmark Submission date 18 Oct 2017 Date of decision 26 Sep 2019 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCRC/C/82/D/36/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2599/en-US
A. S. v. Russian Federation
A. S. v. Russian Federation CERD/C/79/D/45/2009 Communication number s : 045/2009 Author: A. S. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 79 Country Russian Federation Submission date 20 Aug 2009 Date of decision 26 Aug 2011 Comment: This JUTBCERD/C/79/D/45/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1726/en-US
A.Sh. et al. v. Switzerland
A.Sh. et al. v. Switzerland CAT/C/63/D/717/2015 Communication number s : 717/2015 Author: A.Sh. et al. represented by counsel Angela Stettler Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 63 Country Switzerland Submission date 25 Nov 2015 Date of JUTBCAT/C/63/D/717/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2730/en-US
A.U. and H.R. v. New Zealand
A.U. and H.R. v. New Zealand CCPR/C/118/D/2567/2015 Communication number s : 2567/2015 Author: A.U. and H.R. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 118 Country New Zealand Submission date Date of decision Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/118/D/2567/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2233/en-US
A.V. v. Slovenia
A.V. v. Slovenia SVN 09/07/2019 00:00:00 25/07/2019 16:37:20 Case Description: Protection of family life: Disproportionate interference and failure of authorities to protect the applicant s right to contact with his three children due to the domestic EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52625
A.Y.O.AQ v. Italy
A.Y.O.AQ v. Italy CCPR/C/134/D/3587/2019 Communication number s : 3587/2019 Author: A.Y.O.AQ Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 134 Country Italy Submission date 02 May 2018 Date of decision 25 Mar 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/134/D/3587/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3145/en-US
A.Y. v. Switzerland
A.Y. v. Switzerland CAT/C/74/D/887/2018 Communication number s : 887/2018 Author: A.Y. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 74 Country Switzerland Submission date 11 Oct 2018 Date of decision 22 Jul 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/74/D/887/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3620/en-US
A.Y. v. Switzerland
A.Y. v. Switzerland CAT/C/74/D/887/2018 Communication number s : 887/2018 Author: A.Y. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 74 Country Switzerland Submission date 11 Oct 2018 Date of decision 22 Jul 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/74/D/887/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3614/en-US
A and B v. Denmark v. Denmark
A and B v. Denmark v. Denmark CCPR/C/117/D/2291/2013 Communication number s : 2291/2013 Author: A and B Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 117 Country Denmark Submission date 01 Oct 2013 Date of decision 13 Jul 2016 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/117/D/2291/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2128/en-US
Aïcha Habouchi v. Algeria
A cha Habouchi v. Algeria CCPR/C/128/D/2819/2016 Communication number s : 2819/2016 Author: A cha Habouchi Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 128 Country Algeria Submission date 07 Apr 2016 Date of decision 27 Mar 2020 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/128/D/2819/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2871/en-US
A decency threshold for prisons – criteria for assessing conditions of detention
A decency threshold for prisons criteria for assessing conditions of detention fcn fk fkm fkmh fkmv fkrg fmpm ftb 2021 05 06 2018 04 19 European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment CPT CPT/Inf 2021 5 CPTCPT/Inf(2021)5-parthttps://hudoc.cpt.coe.int/eng?i=p-standards-inf-2021-5-part-en
A. v. Canada
A. v. Canada CAT/C/57/D/583/2014 Communication number s : 583/2014 Author: A. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 57 Country Canada Submission date 16 Dec 2014 Date of decision 09 May 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCAT/C/57/D/583/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2115/en-US
A. v. Denmark
A. v. Denmark CCPR/C/116/D/2357/2014 Communication number s : 2357/2014 Author: A. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 116 Country Denmark Submission date 17 Mar 2014 Date of decision 30 Mar 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/116/D/2357/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2114/en-US
A v. Netherlands
A v. Netherlands CAT/C/21/D/91/1997 Communication number s : 091/1997 Author: A Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 21 Country Netherlands Submission date 23 Oct 1997 Date of decision 13 Nov 1998 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/21/D/91/1997https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/239/en-US
A v. Russian Federation
A v. Russian Federation CEDAW/C/81/D/137/2018 Communication number s : 137/2018 Author: A Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 81 Country Russian Federation Submission date 21 Sep 2018 Date of decision 23 Feb 2022 Comment: This document JUTBCEDAW/C/81/D/137/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3051/en-US
ABDILLA v. Malta
ABDILLA v. Malta MLT 17/10/2018 00:00:00 05/11/2018 16:01:55 Case Description: This case concerns the lack of an effective remedy to enable the applicant to challenge the conditions of his detention in the Corradino Correctional Facility where he has been EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50749
ABU ZUBAYDAH v. Lithuania
ABU ZUBAYDAH v. Lithuania LTU 08/10/2018 00:00:00 03/12/2018 15:46:42 Case Description: The case concerns violations of a number of Convention rights on account of the fact that the applicant was the victim of an extraordinary rendition operation. The EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50865
ADOPTED CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS: CZECH REPUBLIC
ADOPTED CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS: CZECH REPUBLIC CEDAW/C/CZE/CO/6 NULL 2016 03 10T00:00:00 CEDAW United Nations CEDAW/C/CZE/CO/6 Convention on the Elimination Distr.: General of All Forms of Discrimination 14 March 2016 against Women Original: English UHRICEDAW/C/CZE/CO/6https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/df44459f-375a-4034-b0d5-fafc9b172d4d
ADOPTED CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS: MONGOLIA
ADOPTED CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS: MONGOLIA CEDAW/C/MNG/CO/8 9 NULL 2016 03 10T00:00:00 CEDAW United Nations CEDAW/C/MNG/CO/8 9 Convention on the Elimination Distr.: General of All Forms of Discrimination 10 March 2016 against Women Original: English UHRICEDAW/C/MNG/CO/8-9https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/bae2a50c-8d7c-4b1e-beee-e65270d191f1