Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1441 - 1458 of 1458
Working Group on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises
Report to HRC A/HRC/26/25/Add.4 from 22 April 2013 to 1 May 2013 6 May 2014 Working Group on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises United States of America United Nations A/HRC/26/25/Add.4 General Assembly UNSPA/HRC/26/25/Add.4https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f26%2f25%2fAdd.4&Lang=en
Working Group on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises
Report to HRC A/HRC/44/43/Add.1 from 3 April 2019 to 12 April 2019 14 April 2020 Working Group on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises Georgia United Nations A/HRC/44/43/Add.1 General Assembly Distr.: UNSPA/HRC/44/43/Add.1https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f44%2f43%2fAdd.1&Lang=en
Working Group on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises
Report to HRC A/HRC/29/28/Add.1 from 18 August 2014 to 27 August 2014 3 June 2015 Working Group on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises Azerbaijan United Nations A/HRC/29/28/Add.1 General Assembly Distr.: UNSPA/HRC/29/28/Add.1https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f29%2f28%2fAdd.1&Lang=en
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/15/25/Add.2 from 4 April 2009 to 9 April 2009 14 June 2010 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination Afghanistan United Nations UNSPA/HRC/15/25/Add.2https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f15%2f25%2fAdd.2&Lang=en
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/4/42/Add.2 from 28 August 2006 to 1 September 2006 23 February 2007 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination Ecuador UNITED UNSPA/HRC/4/42/Add.2https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f4%2f42%2fAdd.2&Lang=en
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/42/42/Add.1 from 16 April 2018 to 23 April 2018 2 July 2019 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination Chad United Nations UNSPA/HRC/42/42/Add.1https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f42%2f42%2fAdd.1&Lang=en
X.Q.H. v. New Zealand
X.Q.H. v. New Zealand CCPR/C/110/D/2197/2012 Communication number s : 2197/2012 Author: X.Q.H. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 110 Country New Zealand Submission date 22 Mar 2012 Date of decision 25 Mar 2014 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/110/D/2197/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1821/en-US
X v. Colombia
X v. Colombia CCPR/C/89/D/1361/2005 Communication number s : 1361/2005 Author: X Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 89 Country Colombia Submission date 13 Jan 2001 Date of decision 30 Mar 2007 Comment: An individual opinion co signed by JUTBCCPR/C/89/D/1361/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1338/en-US
X v. Switzerland
X v. Switzerland CAT/C/71/D/900/2018 Communication number s : 900/2018 Author: X Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 71 Country Switzerland Submission date 04 Dec 2018 Date of decision 22 Jul 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/71/D/900/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3362/en-US
X. v. Timor-Leste
X. v. Timor Leste CEDAW/C/69/D/88/2015 Communication number s : 088/2015 Author: X. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 69 Country Timor Leste Submission date 16 Feb 2015 Date of decision 26 Feb 2018 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/69/D/88/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2638/en-US
X. v. Timor-Leste
X. v. Timor Leste CEDAW/C/69/D/88/2015 Communication number s : 088/2015 Author: X. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 69 Country Timor Leste Submission date Date of decision 26 Feb 2018 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCEDAW/C/69/D/88/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2428/en-US
Y.C. v. Denmark
Y.C. v. Denmark CEDAW/C/59/D/59/2013 Communication number s : 059/2013 Author: Y.C. represented by counsel City Advokaterne Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 59 Country Denmark Submission date 16 Jan 2013 Date of decision 24 Oct 2014 JUTBCEDAW/C/59/D/59/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1882/en-US
Y.G.H. et al v. Australia
Y.G.H. et al v. Australia CAT/C/51/D/434/2010 Communication number s : 434/2010 Author: Y.G.H. et al Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 51 Country Australia Submission date 24 Oct 2010 Date of decision 14 Nov 2013 Comment: This document has JUTBCAT/C/51/D/434/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/7/en-US
Y v. Switzerland
Y v. Switzerland CAT/C/72/D/916/2019 Communication number s : 916/2019 Author: Y Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 72 Country Switzerland Submission date 21 Feb 2019 Date of decision 12 Nov 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/72/D/916/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3352/en-US
Young v. Australia
Young v. Australia CCPR/C/78/D/941/2000 Communication number s : 941/2000 Author: Edward Young Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 78 Country Australia Submission date 29 Jun 1999 Date of decision 06 Aug 2003 Comment: Committee members Ruth JUTBCCPR/C/78/D/941/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1076/en-US
fourth EVALUATION round Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors SECOND COMPLIANCE REPORT LUXEMBOURG
fourth EVALUATION round Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament judges and prosecutors SECOND COMPLIANCE REPORT LUXEMBOURG LUX 2017 10 18 2017 10 20 I. INTRODUCTION The Second Compliance Report assesses the measures taken by the GRECOGrecoRC4-2017-17-Final-eng-Luxembourg-2ndRC-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoRC4-2017-17-Final-eng-Luxembourg-2ndRC-PUBLIC
Ángela Sariego Rodríguez and Ionut-Cosmin Dincă v. Spain
ngela Sariego Rodr guez and Ionut Cosmin Dinc v. Spain E/C.12/70/D/92/2019 Communication number s : 092/2019 Author: ngela Sariego Rodr guez and Ionut Cosmin Dinc Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 70 To be confirmed Country Spain JUTBE/C.12/70/D/92/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2986/en-US
v. Denmark,France,Paraguay,Switzerland
v. Denmark France Paraguay Switzerland CRC/C/92/2 Communication number s : 109/2019 79/2019 77/2019 83/2019 31/201774/2019 .30/2017 Author: Type of decision: Follow up report Session No 92 Country Denmark France Paraguay Switzerland Submission date Date JUTBCRC/C/92/2https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3755/en-US