Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 23
CASE OF AGROTEXIM AND OTHERS v. GREECE
CASE OF AGROTEXIM AND OTHERS v. GREECE 14807/89 N/A GRC 10/24/1995 12:00:00 AM Not necessary to examine preliminary objection ratione temporis Preliminary objection allowed victim Lack of jurisdiction complaint inadmissible new complaint Civil Code ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:1024JUD001480789https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57951
CASE OF ALMEIDA GARRETT, MASCARENHAS FALCAO AND OTHERS v. PORTUGAL
CASE OF ALMEIDA GARRETT MASCARENHAS FALCAO AND OTHERS v. PORTUGAL 29813/96 30229/96 N/A PRT 1/11/2000 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 3 a Ratione temporis Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 Protection of property Article 1 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0111JUD002981396https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58417
CASE OF ASSOCIATION "21 DECEMBER 1989" AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA [Extracts]
CASE OF ASSOCIATION 21 DECEMBER 1989 AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA Extracts 33810/07 18817/08 POPESCU A. SFIRAIALA I. MATEI I. OPREA D. S. ROU 5/24/2011 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 2 procedural aspect Violation of Art. 8 Remainder inadmissible Respondent State ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0524JUD003381007https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-104864
CASE OF CHIRAGOV AND OTHERS v. ARMENIA
CASE OF CHIRAGOV AND OTHERS v. ARMENIA 13216/05 MULLER M. VINE C. BUTLER M. IVERS M. POYNOR B. SWAROOP S. YILDIZ K. ARM 12/12/2017 12:00:00 AM Pecuniary and non pecuniary damage award Article 41 Pecuniary damage Just satisfaction 451 425 426 429 444 110 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1212JUD001321605https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-179554
CASE OF DEMADES v. TURKEY
CASE OF DEMADES v. TURKEY 16219/90 N/A TUR 7/31/2003 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections dismissed ratione temporis ratione loci victim non exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Art. 8 Violation of P1 1 Not necessary to examine Art. 13 Just ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0731JUD001621990https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-61272
CASE OF EUGENIA MICHAELIDOU DEVELOPMENTS LTD AND MICHAEL TYMVIOS v. TURKEY
CASE OF EUGENIA MICHAELIDOU DEVELOPMENTS LTD AND MICHAEL TYMVIOS v. TURKEY 16163/90 N/A TUR 7/31/2003 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections dismissed ratione temporis ratione loci victim non exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of P1 1 Not necessary to ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0731JUD001616390https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-61271
CASE OF GASHI v. CROATIA
CASE OF GASHI v. CROATIA 32457/05 KAPETANOVIC E. HRV 12/13/2007 12:00:00 AM Violation of P1 1 Remainder inadmissible Just satisfaction reserved Section 8 of the Housing Act Sections 1 and 21 of the Protected Tenancies Sale to Occupier Act Sections 51 52 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1213JUD003245705https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-84005
CASE OF HUTTEN-CZAPSKA v. POLAND
CASE OF HUTTEN CZAPSKA v. POLAND 35014/97 SOCHANSKI B. POL 6/19/2006 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection rejected ratione temporis Violation of P1 1 Pecuniary damage reserved Non pecuniary damage financial award Housing Act 1974 Lease of Dwellings and ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0619JUD003501497https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-75882
CASE OF ILAŞCU AND OTHERS v. MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA
CASE OF ILA CU AND OTHERS v. MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA 48787/99 N/A MDA RUS 7/8/2004 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Degrading treatment Inhuman treatment Substantive aspect the Republic of Moldova ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0708JUD004878799https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-61886
CASE OF JANOWIEC AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
CASE OF JANOWIEC AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA 55508/07 29520/09 SZEWCZYK J. KAMINSKI I. NOWOSIELSKI R. SOCHANSKI B. KARPINSKIY R. STAVITSKAYA A. RUS 4/16/2012 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection allowed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Ratione temporis ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0416JUD005550807https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-110513
CASE OF JANOWIEC AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
CASE OF JANOWIEC AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA 55508/07 29520/09 SZEWCZYK J. KAMINSKI I. NOWOSIELSKI R. SOCHANSKI B. KARPINSKIY R. STAVITSKAYA A. RUS 10/21/2013 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection allowed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Ratione temporis ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1021JUD005550807https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-127684
CASE OF KIRILOVA AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA
CASE OF KIRILOVA AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA 42908/98 44038/98 44816/98 7319/02 SEDEFOVA N. KALAYDJIEVA Z. GAVRILOVA ANCHEVA A. BGR 6/9/2005 12:00:00 AM Violation of P1 1 Not necessary to examine Art. 13 Pecuniary damage reserved Non pecuniary damage reserved ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0609JUD004290898https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-69311
CASE OF KOVAL v. UKRAINE
CASE OF KOVAL v. UKRAINE 65550/01 DUNIKOWSKI S. lawyer Nanterre VAKULENKO A. lawyer Ukraine UKR 10/19/2006 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections dismissed Article 35 3 a Ratione materiae Ratione temporis Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1019JUD006555001https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-77576
CASE OF KURIĆ AND OTHERS v. SLOVENIA
CASE OF KURI AND OTHERS v. SLOVENIA 26828/06 LANA A.G. BALLERINI A. SACCUCCI A. VANO M. SVN 6/26/2012 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections dismissed Article 35 1 Effective domestic remedy Continuing situation Article 35 3 Ratione materiae Ratione temporis ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0626JUD002682806https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-111634
CASE OF LOIZIDOU v. TURKEY
CASE OF LOIZIDOU v. TURKEY 15318/89 DEMETRIADES A. TUR 12/18/1996 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection rejected ratione temporis Violation of P1 1 No violation of Art. 8 Just satisfaction reserved Prohibited Military Areas Decree of 1979 section 9 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:1218JUD001531889https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58007
CASE OF PLECHANOW v. POLAND
CASE OF PLECHANOW v. POLAND 22279/04 LECHNA PIOTROWSKA M. POL 7/7/2009 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed non exhaustion of domestic remedies Preliminary objections dismissed ratione temporis ratione materiae ratione personae ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0707JUD002227904https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-93302
CASE OF POTOMSKA AND POTOMSKI v. POLAND
CASE OF POTOMSKA AND POTOMSKI v. POLAND 33949/05 WICHER KLUCZKOWSKA K. POL 3/29/2011 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed non exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of P1 1 Just satisfaction reserved The 1962 Protection of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0329JUD003394905https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-104145
CASE OF ROMANENKO AND ROMANENKO v. RUSSIA
CASE OF ROMANENKO AND ROMANENKO v. RUSSIA 19457/02 STAVITSKAYA A. E. KARPINSKIY R. S. RUS 10/19/2006 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 1 Remainder inadmissible Non pecuniary damage financial award Costs and expenses partial award Convention proceedings 14 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1019JUD001945702https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-77563
CASE OF SARGSYAN v. AZERBAIJAN
CASE OF SARGSYAN v. AZERBAIJAN 40167/06 GASPARYAN N. OHANYAN K. AZE 6/16/2015 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 3 Continuing situation Preliminary objection ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0616JUD004016706https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-155662
CASE OF SARGSYAN v. AZERBAIJAN
CASE OF SARGSYAN v. AZERBAIJAN 40167/06 GASPARYAN N. OHANYAN K. LEACH Ph. AZE 12/12/2017 12:00:00 AM Pecuniary and non pecuniary damage award Article 41 Non pecuniary damage Pecuniary damage Just satisfaction 293 430 451 425 426 429 444 110 120 115 14 402 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1212JUD004016706https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-179555