Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 3281 - 3300 of 3575
Osmani v. Serbia
Osmani v. Serbia CAT/C/42/D/261/2005 Communication number s : 261/2005 Author: Besim Osmani Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 42 Country Serbia Submission date 17 Dec 2004 Date of decision 08 May 2009 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/42/D/261/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/68/en-US
P. AND S. v. Poland
P. AND S. v. Poland POL 30/01/2013 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: These three cases concern the lack of effective access to lawful abortion in Poland. The Tysi c and R.R. cases concern the lack of effective procedural mechanisms to enable EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20614
PETROVA v. Latvia
PETROVA v. Latvia LVA 24/09/2014 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:30:55 Case Description: Protection of private life and against ill treatment: Removal of organs for transplantation of the applicant s son and husband respectively without knowledge or consent of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12652
Padilla et al. v. Mexico
Padilla et al. v. Mexico CCPR/C/126/D/2750/2016 Communication number s : 2750/2016 Author: Mar a Eugenia Padilla Garc a Ricardo Ulises T llez Padilla and Mar a Eugenia Zald var Padilla on their own behalf and on behalf of Christian T llez Padilla their JUTBCCPR/C/126/D/2750/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2780/en-US
Perera v. Sri Lanka
Perera v. Sri Lanka CCPR/C/78/D/1091/2002 Communication number s : 1091/2002 Author: Wannakuwatte Perera Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 78 Country Sri Lanka Submission date 18 Apr 2002 Date of decision 07 Aug 2003 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/78/D/1091/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/965/en-US
Persan v. Czech Republic
Persan v. Czech Republic CCPR/C/95/D/1479/2006 Communication number s : 1479/2006 Author: Jaroslav Persan Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 95 Country Czech Republic Submission date 17 Apr 2006 Date of decision 24 Mar 2009 Comment: An JUTBCCPR/C/95/D/1479/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1490/en-US
Perterer v. Austria
Perterer v. Austria CCPR/C/81/D/1015/2001 Communication number s : 1015/2001 Author: Paul Perterer Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 81 Country Austria Submission date 31 Jul 2001 Date of decision 20 Jul 2004 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/81/D/1015/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1124/en-US
Piandiong et al. v. Philippines
Piandiong et al. v. Philippines CCPR/C/70/D/869/1999 Communication number s : 869/1999 Author: Alexander Padilla and Ricardo III Sunga legal counsel Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 70 Country Philippines Submission date 15 Jun 1999 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/70/D/869/1999https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/912/en-US
Pichardo Salazar v. Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of)
Pichardo Salazar v. Venezuela Bolivarian Republic of CCPR/C/132/D/2833/2016 Communication number s : 2833/2016 Author: Jos Luis Pichardo Salazar Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 132 Country Venezuela Bolivarian Republic of Submission date JUTBCCPR/C/132/D/2833/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3189/en-US
Pillai et al. v. Canada
Pillai et al. v. Canada CCPR/C/101/D/1763/2008 Communication number s : 1763/2008 Author: Ernest Sigman Pillai and Laeticia Swenthi Joachimpillai Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 101 Country Canada Submission date 29 Feb 2008 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/101/D/1763/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1631/en-US
Pirogov v. Russian Federation
Pirogov v. Russian Federation CCPR/C/133/D/2916/2016 Communication number s : 2916/2016 Author: Evgeny Pirogov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 133 Country Russian Federation Submission date 31 Oct 2016 Date of decision 20 Oct 2021 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/133/D/2916/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3159/en-US
Protocol of Amendment to the European Convention for the Protection of Vertebrate Animals used for Experimental and other Scientific Purposes (ETS No. 170) (*)
Protocol of Amendment to the European Convention for the Protection of Vertebrate Animals used for Experimental and other Scientific Purposes ETS No. 170 170 Strasbourg 1998 06 22T00:00:00 Since its entry into force this Protocol forms an integrant part COEETS No. 170https://rm.coe.int/168007f2cc
Protsko and Tolchi v. Belarus
Protsko and Tolchi v. Belarus CCPR/C/109/D/1919 1920/2009 Communication number s : 1919/2009 1920/2009 Author: Alexander Protsko and Andrei Tolchi Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 109 Country Belarus Submission date 22 Aug 2009 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/109/D/1919-1920/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1691/en-US
Pustovalov v. Russian Federation
Pustovalov v. Russian Federation CCPR/C/98/D/1232/2003 Communication number s : 1232/2003 Author: Oleg Pustovalov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 98 Country Russian Federation Submission date 05 Nov 2003 Date of decision 23 Mar 2010 JUTBCCPR/C/98/D/1232/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1554/en-US
Quereshi v. Denmark
Quereshi v. Denmark CERD/C/63/D/27/2002 Communication number s : 027/2002 Author: Kamal Quereshi Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 63 Country Denmark Submission date 23 Oct 2002 Date of decision 19 Aug 2003 Comment: This document has no JUTBCERD/C/63/D/27/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1742/en-US
R.K.B. v. Türkiye
R.K.B. v. T rkiye CEDAW/C/51/D/28/2010 Communication number s : 028/2010 Author: R.K.B. represented by counsel Ozge Yildiz Arslan Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 51 Country T rkiye Submission date 14 Jul 2009 Date of decision 24 Feb 2012 JUTBCEDAW/C/51/D/28/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1720/en-US
R.M. v. Trinidad and Tobago
R.M. v. Trinidad and Tobago CCPR/C/49/D/384/1989 Communication number s : 384/1989 Author: R.M. name deleted Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 49 Country Trinidad and Tobago Submission date 16 Jul 1989 Date of decision 29 Oct 1993 JUTBCCPR/C/49/D/384/1989https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/643/en-US
R.R. v. Poland
R.R. v. Poland POL 28/11/2011 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: These three cases concern the lack of effective access to lawful abortion in Poland. The Tysi c and R.R. cases concern the lack of effective procedural mechanisms to enable the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20596
R.S.A.A. v. Denmark
R.S.A.A. v. Denmark CEDAW/C/73/D/86/2015 Communication number s : 086/2015 Author: R.S.A.A. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 73 Country Denmark Submission date 28 Apr 2015 Date of decision 15 Jul 2019 Comment: This document has no JUTBCEDAW/C/73/D/86/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2654/en-US
REPORT OF THE INDEPENDENT EXPERT ON MINORITY ISSUES, GAY MCDOUGALL : ADDENDUM: MISSION TO GREECE
REPORT OF THE INDEPENDENT EXPERT ON MINORITY ISSUES GAY MCDOUGALL : ADDENDUM: MISSION TO GREECE A/HRC/10/11/ADD.3 NULL 2009 02 18T06:00:00 SR Minorities UNITED NATIONS A Distr. GENERAL General Assembly A/HRC/10/11/Add.3 18 February 2009 Original: ENGLISH UHRIA/HRC/10/11/ADD.3https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/441b2b43-429e-4ec7-819c-110d86f3c11f