Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 3481 - 3500 of 3575
Summary of Stakeholders’ submissions on Malawi - Report of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights
United Nations A/HRC/WG.6/36/MWI/3 General Assembly Distr.: General 28 February 2020 Original: English Human Rights Council Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review Thirty sixth session 4 15 May 2020 Summary of Stakeholders submissions on Malawi UPRA/HRC/WG.6/36/MWI/3https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/summary-stakeholders-submissions-malawi-report-office-united-nations-high
Summary of Stakeholders’ submissions on the United States of America - Report of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights
United Nations A/HRC/WG.6/36/USA/3 General Assembly Distr.: General 6 March 2020 Original: English Human Rights Council Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review Thirty sixth session 4 15 May 2020 Summary of Stakeholders submissions on the United UPRA/HRC/WG.6/36/USA/3https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/reports/summary-stakeholders-submissions-united-states-america-report-office-united
T.C. AND H.C. v. Turkey
T.C. AND H.C. v. Turkey TUR 26/10/2011 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:53:30 Case Description: Protection of private and family life and functioning of justice: Interference due to various procedural irregularities during domestic proceedings challenging paternal EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37250
T.J. v. Lithuania
T.J. v. Lithuania CCPR/C/107/D/1911/2009 Communication number s : 1911/2009 Author: T.J. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 107 Country Lithuania Submission date 12 Sep 2009 Date of decision 25 Mar 2013 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/107/D/1911/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1329/en-US
T. M. v. Republic of Korea
T. M. v. Republic of Korea CAT/C/53/D/519/2012 Communication number s : 519/2012 Author: T. M. represented by counsel Jae Chang Oh Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 53 Country Republic of Korea Submission date 24 Apr 2012 Date of decision 21 JUTBCAT/C/53/D/519/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2059/en-US
T.W.M.B. v. Netherlands
T.W.M.B. v. Netherlands CCPR/C/43/D/403/1990 Communication number s : 403/1990 Author: T.W.M.B. name deleted Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 43 Country Netherlands Submission date 11 Apr 1990 Date of decision 07 Nov 1991 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/43/D/403/1990https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/606/en-US
T.Z. v. Switzerland
T.Z. v. Switzerland CAT/C/62/D/688/2015 Communication number s : 688/2015 Author: T.Z. represented by counsel Stephanie Motz Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 62 Country Switzerland Submission date 07 Jul 2015 Date of decision 22 Nov 2017 JUTBCAT/C/62/D/688/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2334/en-US
THLIMMENOS v. Greece
THLIMMENOS v. Greece GRC 06/04/2000 00:00:00 07/11/2016 09:36:22 Case Description: Discrimination on religious grounds / access to and effective functioning of justice: Discriminatory treatment of the applicant due to the authorities refusal to appoint EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-22168
TYSIAC v. Poland
TYSIAC v. Poland POL 24/09/2007 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: These three cases concern the lack of effective access to lawful abortion in Poland. The Tysi c and R.R. cases concern the lack of effective procedural mechanisms to enable the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20592
Taous Azouz v. Algeria
Taous Azouz v. Algeria CCPR/C/108/D/1798/2008 Communication number s : 1798/2008 Author: Taous Azouz Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 108 Country Algeria Submission date 07 Jul 2008 Date of decision 25 Jul 2013 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/108/D/1798/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1796/en-US
Tatyana v. Poland
Tatyana v. Poland CCPR/C/101/D/1517/2006 Communication number s : 1517/2006 Author: Tatyana Rastorgueva Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 101 Country Poland Submission date 25 Sep 2006 Date of decision 28 Mar 2011 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/101/D/1517/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1616/en-US
Taylor (Desmond) v. Jamaica
Taylor Desmond v. Jamaica CCPR/C/62/D/705/1996 Communication number s : 705/1996 Author: Desmond Taylor Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 62 Country Jamaica Submission date 14 Jun 1996 Date of decision 02 Apr 1998 Comment: Individual opinion JUTBCCPR/C/62/D/705/1996https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/840/en-US
Teesdale v. Trinidad and Tobago
Teesdale v. Trinidad and Tobago CCPR/C/74/D/677/1996 Communication number s : 677/1996 Author: Kenneth Teesdale Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 74 Country Trinidad and Tobago Submission date 16 Mar 1995 Date of decision 01 Apr 2002 JUTBCCPR/C/74/D/677/1996https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/953/en-US
Telitsina v. Russian Federation
Telitsina v. Russian Federation CCPR/C/80/D/888/1999 Communication number s : 888/1999 Author: Yuliya Vasilyevna Telitsina Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 80 Country Russian Federation Submission date 24 Oct 1997 Date of decision 29 Mar JUTBCCPR/C/80/D/888/1999https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1097/en-US
Thabti v. Tunisia
Thabti v. Tunisia CAT/C/31/D/187/2001 Communication number s : 187/2001 Author: Dhaou Belgacem Thabti Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 31 Country Tunisia Submission date 01 Jun 2000 Date of decision 14 Nov 2003 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/31/D/187/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/166/en-US
Third Additional Protocol to the European Convention on Extradition (CETS No. 209)
Third Additional Protocol to the European Convention on Extradition CETS No. 209 209 Strasbourg 2010 11 10T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the member States of the Council of Europe which are Parties to or which have signed the treaty ETS 24 and for COECETS No. 209https://rm.coe.int/168008482c
Third Evaluation Round Compliance Report on Andorra “Incriminations (ETS 173 and 191, GPC 2)” * * * “Transparency of political party funding”
Third Evaluation Round Compliance Report on Andorra Incriminations ETS 173 and 191 GPC 2 Transparency of political party funding AND 2013 10 18 2013 11 22 Adoption: 18 October 2013 Public Publication: 22 November 2013 Greco RC III 2013 12E Third GRECOGreco-RC-III-2013-12E-Final-Andorra-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-RC-III-2013-12E-Final-Andorra-PUBLIC
Third Evaluation Round Compliance Report on Belgium “Incriminations (ETS 173 and 191, GP 2)” * * * “Transparency of Political Party Funding”
Third Evaluation Round Compliance Report on Belgium Incriminations ETS 173 and 191 GP 2 Transparency of Political Party Funding BEL 2011 05 27 2011 08 10 Directorate General of Human Rights and Legal Affairs Directorate of Monitoring Strasbourg 27 May GRECOGreco-RC-III-2011-6E-Final-Belgium-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-RC-III-2011-6E-Final-Belgium-PUBLIC
Third Evaluation Round Compliance Report on Denmark “Incriminations (ETS 173 and 191, GPC 2)” *** “Transparency of Party Funding”
Third Evaluation Round Compliance Report on Denmark Incriminations ETS 173 and 191 GPC 2 Transparency of Party Funding DNK 2011 05 27 2011 08 18 Directorate General of Human Rights and Legal Affairs Directorate of Monitoring Strasbourg 27 May 2011 Public GRECOGreco-RC-III-2011-8E-Final-Denmark-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-RC-III-2011-8E-Final-Denmark-PUBLIC
Third Evaluation Round Evaluation Report on Bosnia and Herzegovina on Transparency of Party Funding (Theme II)
Third Evaluation Round Evaluation Report on Bosnia and Herzegovina on Transparency of Party Funding Theme II BIH 2011 05 27 2011 08 17 Directorate General of Human Rights and Legal Affairs Directorate of Monitoring Strasbourg 27 May 2011 Public Greco Eval GRECOGreco-Eval-III-Rep-2010-5E-Final-BiH-PF-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-Eval-III-Rep-2010-5E-Final-BiH-PF-PUBLIC