Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 122
A.H. and S.H. v. France
A.H. and S.H. v. France CAT/C/73/D/933/2019 Communication number s : 933/2019 Author: A.H. and S.H. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 73 Country France Submission date 14 May 2019 Date of decision 22 Apr 2022 Comment: This document has JUTBCAT/C/73/D/933/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3335/en-US
CASE OF AL-SAADOON AND MUFDHI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF AL SAADOON AND MUFDHI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 61498/08 SHINER P. GBR 3/2/2010 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 3 substantive aspect No violation of Art. 6 Violation of Art. 13 Violation of Art. 34 Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient 26 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0302JUD006149808https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-97575
CASE OF BERKOVICH AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
CASE OF BERKOVICH AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA 5871/07 61948/08 25025/10 19971/12 46965/12 75561/12 73574/13 504/14 31941/14 45416/14 SAMORODKINA M. V. RUS 3/27/2018 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Manifestly ill ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0327JUD000587107https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-181876
CASE OF GEORGIA v. RUSSIA (II)
CASE OF GEORGIA v. RUSSIA II 38263/08 RUS 1/21/2021 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Ratione loci ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0121JUD003826308https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-207757
CASE OF H.F. AND OTHERS v. FRANCE
CASE OF H.F. AND OTHERS v. FRANCE 24384/19 44234/20 DOS M. FRA 9/14/2022 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 34 Individual applications Art. 34 Locus standi Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Ratione loci Art. ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0914JUD002438419https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-219333
CASE OF HANAN v. GERMANY
CASE OF HANAN v. GERMANY 4871/16 KALECK W. DEU 2/16/2021 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Manifestly ill founded No violation of Article 2 Right to life Article 2 1 Effective investigation Procedural aspect ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0216JUD000487116https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-208279
CASE OF IBRAHIM AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF IBRAHIM AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 50541/08 50571/08 50573/08 40351/09 IRVINE THANVI NATAS BENNATHAN J. ARANI SOLICITORS VULLO S. KING J. FAUL A. GBR 9/13/2016 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 6 6 3 c Right to a ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0913JUD005054108https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-166680
CASE OF ILAŞCU AND OTHERS v. MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA
CASE OF ILA CU AND OTHERS v. MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA 48787/99 N/A MDA RUS 7/8/2004 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Degrading treatment Inhuman treatment Substantive aspect the Republic of Moldova ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0708JUD004878799https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-61886
CASE OF JALOUD v. THE NETHERLANDS
CASE OF JALOUD v. THE NETHERLANDS 47708/08 ZEGVELD L. EIKELBOOM A.W. NLD 11/20/2014 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 2 Right to life Article 2 Positive obligations Article 2 1 Effective investigation Procedural aspect Non pecuniary damage award Article 38 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1120JUD004770808https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-148367
CASE OF L.M. AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
CASE OF L.M. AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA 40081/14 40088/14 40127/14 GOLOVANCHUK N.Y. RUS 10/15/2015 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 2 Right to life Article 2 Expulsion Conditional Syria Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1015JUD004008114https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-157709
CASE OF S.K. v. RUSSIA
CASE OF S.K. v. RUSSIA 52722/15 BIRYUKOVA I. RUS 2/14/2017 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 2 Right to life Article 2 Expulsion Conditional Syria Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Expulsion Conditional Syria Violation of Article 13 2 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0214JUD005272215https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-171101
CASE OF SABUNCU AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
CASE OF SABUNCU AND OTHERS v. TURKEY 23199/17 LKIZ F. TUR 11/10/2020 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Art. 35 2 b Matter already submitted to another international ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1110JUD002319917https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-206212
CASE OF SARGSYAN v. AZERBAIJAN
CASE OF SARGSYAN v. AZERBAIJAN 40167/06 GASPARYAN N. OHANYAN K. AZE 6/16/2015 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 3 Continuing situation Preliminary objection ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0616JUD004016706https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-155662
CASE OF Z.A. AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
CASE OF Z.A. AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA 61411/15 61420/15 61427/15 3028/16 DAVIDYAN E. TRENINA D. RUS 3/28/2017 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 5 Right to liberty and security Article 5 1 Deprivation of liberty Lawful arrest or detention Article 5 1 f Prevent ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0328JUD006141115https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-172107
CASE OF Z.A. AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
CASE OF Z.A. AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA 61411/15 61420/15 61427/15 3028/16 DAVIDYAN E. TRENINA D. ZHARINOV K. RUS 11/21/2019 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 5 Right to liberty and security Article 5 1 Deprivation of liberty Article 5 1 f Prevent unauthorised ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1121JUD006141115https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-198811
Council adopts outcome of Universal Periodic Review on the United States, holds general debate on the Universal Periodic Review
Human Rights Council AFTERNOON 18 March 2011 The Human Rights Council this afternoon adopted the outcome of the Universal Periodic Review on the United States and held a general debate on the Universal Periodic Review. Harold Hongju Koh Legal Adviser of UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2011/03/council-adopts-outcome-universal-periodic-review-united-states-holds-general
H.A. v. Sweden
H.A. v. Sweden CAT/C/63/D/744/2016 Communication number s : 744/2016 Author: H.A. represented by counsel Viktoria Nystr m Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 63 Country Sweden Submission date 08 Apr 2016 Date of decision 11 May 2018 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/63/D/744/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2737/en-US
Human Rights Council Adopts Universal Periodic Review Outcome of Bahrain
MORNING 24 March 2023 Council Concludes General Debate on Human Rights Bodies and Mechanisms The Human Rights Council this morning adopted the Universal Periodic Review outcome of Bahrain. It also concluded the general debate on agenda item five on human UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/news/2023/03/human-rights-council-adopts-universal-periodic-review-outcome-bahrain
Human Rights Council Adopts Universal Periodic Review Outcomes of Australia, Saint Lucia, and Nepal
8 July 2021 The Human Rights Council in a midday meeting adopted the Universal Periodic Review outcomes of Australia Saint Lucia and Nepal. Speaking on the Universal Periodic Review outcome of Australia were Malawi Marshall Islands Morocco Namibia Nepal UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2021/07/human-rights-council-adopts-universal-periodic-review-outcomes-australia
Human Rights Council Adopts Universal Periodic Review Outcomes of Liberia and Jamaica, Starts General Debate on Human Rights Bodies and Mechanisms
Special Procedures Are Ready to Contribute to Make the Call to Action for Human Rights a Reality Chairperson of Coordination Committee of Special Procedures Tells Human Rights Council 17 March 2021 AFTERNOON The Human Rights Council this afternoon adopted UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2021/03/human-rights-council-adopts-universal-periodic-review-outcomes-liberia-and