Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 137
A.B.H. v. Denmark
A.B.H. v. Denmark CCPR/C/126/D/2603/2015 Communication number s : 2603/2015 Author: A.B.H. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 126 Country Denmark Submission date 28 Apr 2015 Date of decision 08 Jul 2019 Comment: An individual opinion by JUTBCCPR/C/126/D/2603/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2778/en-US
A.E.M. v. Australia
A.E.M. v. Australia CAT/C/64/D/803/2017 Communication number s : 803/2017 Author: A.E.M. represented by counsel Alison Battisson Type of decision: Discontinuance decision Session No 64 Country Australia Submission date 03 Feb 2017 Date of decision 03 Aug JUTBCAT/C/64/D/803/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2455/en-US
A.H. v. Denmark
A.H. v. Denmark CCPR/C/114/D/2370/2014 Communication number s : 2370/2014 Author: A.H. represented by counsel Helge N rrung Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 114 Country Denmark Submission date 18 Mar 2014 Date of decision 16 Jul 2015 JUTBCCPR/C/114/D/2370/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1954/en-US
A/HRC/47/11: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Oman
United Nations A/HRC/47/11 General Assembly Distr.: General 25 March 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty seventh session 21 June 9 July 2021 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review UPRA/HRC/47/11https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/ahrc4711-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-oman
A.K. et al. v. Australia
A.K. et al. v. Australia CCPR/C/132/D/2365/2014 Communication number s : 2365/2014 Author: A.K. et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 132 Country Australia Submission date 13 Mar 2014 Date of decision 08 Jul 2021 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/132/D/2365/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3109/en-US
A.S. v. Sweden
A.S. v. Sweden CAT/C/74/D/949/2019 Communication number s : 949/2019 Author: A.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 74 Country Sweden Submission date 26 Jul 2019 Date of decision 27 Jul 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCAT/C/74/D/949/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3611/en-US
A.U. and H.R. v. New Zealand
A.U. and H.R. v. New Zealand CCPR/C/118/D/2567/2015 Communication number s : 2567/2015 Author: A.U. and H.R. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 118 Country New Zealand Submission date Date of decision Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/118/D/2567/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2233/en-US
Aden et al. v. Denmark
Aden et al. v. Denmark CCPR/C/126/D/2531/2015 Communication number s : 2531/2015 Author: Nimo Mohamed Aden and Liban Muhammed Hassan Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 126 Country Denmark Submission date 15 Sep 2014 Date of decision 25 Jul JUTBCCPR/C/126/D/2531/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2791/en-US
Ali and Ali v. Norway
Ali and Ali v. Norway CCPR/C/135/D/2926/2017 Communication number s : 2926/2017 Author: Imran Ali and Bakhtaware Ali Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 135 Country Norway Submission date 04 Jan 2017 Date of decision 14 Jul 2022 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/135/D/2926/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3677/en-US
B.B. v. Sweden
B.B. v. Sweden CCPR/C/131/D/3069/2017 Communication number s : 3069/2017 Author: B.B. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 131 Country Sweden Submission date 11 Dec 2017 Date of decision 16 Mar 2021 Comment: Joint opinion of Committee members JUTBCCPR/C/131/D/3069/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3248/en-US
Bakhtiyari v. Australia
Bakhtiyari v. Australia CCPR/C/79/D/1069/2002 Communication number s : 1069/2002 Author: Ali Aqsar Bakhtiyari and Roqaiha Bakhtiyari Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 79 Country Australia Submission date 25 Mar 2002 Date of decision 29 Oct JUTBCCPR/C/79/D/1069/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1092/en-US
C.Y. v. Denmark
C.Y. v. Denmark CAT/C/63/D/647/2014 Communication number s : 647/2014 Author: C.Y. represented by counsel Niels Erik Hansen Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 63 Country Denmark Submission date 17 Dec 2014 Date of decision 17 May 2018 JUTBCAT/C/63/D/647/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2741/en-US
CASE OF A.M. v. THE NETHERLANDS
CASE OF A.M. v. THE NETHERLANDS 29094/09 TER MEULEN MOUWEN E. NLD 7/5/2016 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 13 3 Right to an ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0705JUD002909409https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-164460
CASE OF BABAR AHMAD AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BABAR AHMAD AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 24027/07 11949/08 36742/08 66911/09 67354/09 PEIRCE G. COOPER B. ARANI M. JONES A. BRANDON B. RAJA A. JONES J. GBR 4/10/2012 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0410JUD002402707https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-110267
CASE OF HASSAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF HASSAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 29750/09 SHINER P. OTTY T. HICKMAN T. GBR 9/16/2014 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 5 Right to liberty and security Article 5 1 Deprivation of liberty Lawful arrest or detention No violation ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0916JUD002975009https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-146501
CASE OF ILIAS AND AHMED v. HUNGARY
CASE OF ILIAS AND AHMED v. HUNGARY 47287/15 POH RNOK B. HUN 11/21/2019 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection allowed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Six month period Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Ratione materiae ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1121JUD004728715https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-198760
CASE OF KASYMAKHUNOV AND SAYBATALOV v. RUSSIA
CASE OF KASYMAKHUNOV AND SAYBATALOV v. RUSSIA 26261/05 26377/06 HUMAN RIGHTS CENTRE MEMORIAL RUS 3/14/2013 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Article 35 3 Ratione materiae Violation of Article 7 No punishment without law Article 7 1 Nulla poena sine lege ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0314JUD002626105https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-117127
CASE OF MOUVEMENT RAËLIEN SUISSE v. SWITZERLAND
CASE OF MOUVEMENT RA LIEN SUISSE v. SWITZERLAND 16354/06 ELKAIM E. CHE 7/13/2012 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 3 Manifestly ill founded No violation of Article 10 Freedom of expression General Article 10 1 Freedom of expression ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0713JUD001635406https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-112165
David Hicks v. Australia
David Hicks v. Australia CCPR/C/115/D/2005/2010 Communication number s : 2005/2010 Author: David Hicks Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 115 Country Australia Submission date 20 Sep 2010 Date of decision 05 Nov 2015 Comment: Individual JUTBCCPR/C/115/D/2005/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2084/en-US
E.U.R. v. Denmark
E.U.R. v. Denmark CCPR/C/117/D/2469/2014 Communication number s : 2469/2014 Author: E.U.R. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 117 Country Denmark Submission date 23 Oct 2014 Date of decision 01 Jul 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/117/D/2469/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2156/en-US