Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1161 - 1180 of 1766
NICHOLAS v. Cyprus
NICHOLAS v. Cyprus CYP 09/04/2018 00:00:00 23/05/2018 10:12:10 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Objectively justified doubts on impartiality of the judge deciding on an appeal in law relationship with the managing partner EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49515
NO_TRANSLATION_FOUND_FOR742b2baa-0d0b-49c9-9700-c5f333d3968e
NO TRANSLATION FOUND FOR742b2baa 0d0b 49c9 9700 c5f333d3968e E/C.12/BFA/CO/1 NULL 2016 07 12T00:00:00 CESCR United Nations E/C.12/BFA/CO/1 Economic and Social Council Distr.: General 12 July 2016 English Original: French Committee on Economic Social and UHRIE/C.12/BFA/CO/1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/742b2baa-0d0b-49c9-9700-c5f333d3968e
O.G. v. Russian Federation
O.G. v. Russian Federation CEDAW/C/68/D/91/2015 Communication number s : 091/2015 Author: O.G. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 68 Country Russian Federation Submission date Date of decision 06 Nov 2017 Comment: This document has no JUTBCEDAW/C/68/D/91/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2429/en-US
O.M. v. Ukraine
O.M. v. Ukraine CEDAW/C/73/D/87/2015 Communication number s : 087/2015 Author: O.M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 73 Country Ukraine Submission date 01 Sep 2014 Date of decision 19 Jul 2019 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/73/D/87/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2655/en-US
Opening statement by Flavia Pansieri, Deputy High Commissioner for Human Rights at the Side event on the role of Parliaments in the work of the HRC, in particular the UPR
Monday 22 June 12:00 to 14:00 Palais des Nations Room XXV Colleagues and friends I am pleased to jointly open with IPU this important side event on the role of parliamentarians in the work of the Human Rights Council and in particular of the universal UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/statements/2015/07/opening-statement-flavia-pansieri-deputy-high-commissioner-human-rights-side
P.B. AND J.S. v. Austria
P.B. AND J.S. v. Austria AUT 22/10/2010 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Discriminatory treatment of a same sex couple due to refusal to extend the health and accident insurance of a civil servant to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1041
P.E. v. France
P.E. v. France CAT/C/29/D/193/2001 Communication number s : 193/2001 Author: P.E. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 29 Country France Submission date 24 Sep 2001 Date of decision 21 Nov 2002 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCAT/C/29/D/193/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/177/en-US
P.S. v. Sweden
P.S. v. Sweden CAT/C/72/D/1000/2020 Communication number s : 1000/2020 Author: P.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 72 Country Sweden Submission date 23 Feb 2020 Date of decision 12 Nov 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/72/D/1000/2020https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3343/en-US
Pérez Guartambel v. Ecuador
P rez Guartambel v. Ecuador CERD/C/100/D/61/2017 Communication number s : 61/2017 Author: Yaku P rez Guartambel Type of decision: Admissibility decision Session No 100 Country Ecuador Submission date 10 Feb 2017 Date of decision 04 Dec 2019 Comment: This JUTBCERD/C/100/D/61/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3445/en-US
PERU : OBSERVATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE STATE PARTY
PERU : OBSERVATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE STATE PARTY CAT/OP/PER/1 NULL 2017 08 09T00:00:00 SPT United Nations CAT/OP/PER/1 Optional Protocol to the Distr.: General Convention against Torture 9 August 2017 English and Other Cruel Inhuman Original: UHRICAT/OP/PER/1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/f2642e4e-8792-4cd9-b0b6-c004eebe10be
PETROV v. Bulgaria
PETROV v. Bulgaria BGR 22/08/2008 00:00:00 04/11/2016 14:40:21 Case Description: Disproportionate and discriminatory interference with private and family life and correspondence excessive length of criminal proceedings and lack of remedy: Unjustified EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14347
PORTUGAL: OBSERVATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ADDRESSED TO THE STATE PARTY
PORTUGAL: OBSERVATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ADDRESSED TO THE STATE PARTY CAT/OP/PRT/1 NULL 2019 07 03T00:00:00 SPT United Nations CAT/OP/PRT/1 Optional Protocol to the Distr.: General 3 July 2019 Convention against Torture and Other Cruel Inhuman Original: UHRICAT/OP/PRT/1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/d8a40c9d-dcf3-4f0c-9875-f48acd82fd28
PROKOPOVICH v. Russia
PROKOPOVICH v. Russia RUS 18/02/2005 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:03:34 Case Description: Protection of private life and home: Unlawful eviction of the applicant from a flat after the death of her late partner who held tenancy rights to the flat. Article 8 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-27530
Padilla et al. v. Mexico
Padilla et al. v. Mexico CCPR/C/126/D/2750/2016 Communication number s : 2750/2016 Author: Mar a Eugenia Padilla Garc a Ricardo Ulises T llez Padilla and Mar a Eugenia Zald var Padilla on their own behalf and on behalf of Christian T llez Padilla their JUTBCCPR/C/126/D/2750/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2780/en-US
Parra Corral v. Spain
Parra Corral v. Spain CCPR/C/83/D/1356/2005 Communication number s : 1356/2005 Author: Antonio Parra Corral Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 83 Country Spain Submission date 12 Dec 2004 Date of decision 29 Mar 2005 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/83/D/1356/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1145/en-US
Petit v. France
Petit v. France CCPR/C/90/D/1384/2005 Communication number s : 1384/2005 Author: Robert and Marie Fran oise Petit Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 90 Country France Submission date 01 Nov 2004 Date of decision 24 Jul 2007 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/90/D/1384/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1401/en-US
R.R., M.R. v. Finland
R.R. M.R. v. Finland CEDAW/C/75/D/111/2017 Communication number s : 111/2017 Author: R.R. M.R. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 75 Country Finland Submission date Date of decision 17 Feb 2020 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/75/D/111/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2706/en-US
R.S.A.N. v. Canada
R.S.A.N. v. Canada CAT/C/37/D/284/2006 Communication number s : 284/2006 Author: R.S.A.N. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 37 Country Canada Submission date 12 Dec 2005 Date of decision 17 Nov 2006 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/37/D/284/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/108/en-US
Rékasi v. Hungary
R kasi v. Hungary CRPD/C/25/D/44/2017 Communication number s : 44/2017 Author: Magdolna R kasi Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 25 Country Hungary Submission date 27 Jul 2017 Date of decision 06 Sep 2021 Comment: This document has no JUTBCRPD/C/25/D/44/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3064/en-US
REPORT OF THE INDEPENDENT EXPERT ON THE EFFECTS OF FOREIGN DEBT AND OTHER RELATED INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS OF STATES ON THE FULL ENJOYMENT OF ALL HUMAN RIGHTS, PARTICULARLY ECONOMIC, SOCIAL AND CULTURAL RIGHTS, CEPHAS LUMINA : ADDENDUM :
REPORT OF THE INDEPENDENT EXPERT ON THE EFFECTS OF FOREIGN DEBT AND OTHER RELATED INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS OF STATES ON THE FULL ENJOYMENT OF ALL HUMAN RIGHTS PARTICULARLY ECONOMIC SOCIAL AND CULTURAL RIGHTS CEPHAS LUMINA : ADDENDUM : MISSION UHRIA/HRC/20/23/Add.2https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/80f255ca-fe8a-4c0b-ade7-b58ea553a62e