Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 1494
A.S. v. Nepal
A.S. v. Nepal CCPR/C/115/D/2077/2011 Communication number s : 2077/2011 Author: A.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 115 Country Nepal Submission date 22 Jul 2011 Date of decision 06 Nov 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/115/D/2077/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2045/en-US
A v. Bosnia and Herzegovina
A v. Bosnia and Herzegovina CAT/C/67/D/854/2017 Communication number s : 854/2017 Author: A represented by counsel Philip Grant of TRIAL International Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 67 Country Bosnia and Herzegovina Submission date 01 Nov JUTBCAT/C/67/D/854/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2623/en-US
A. v. Croatia
A. v. Croatia HRV 14/01/2011 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:24:46 Case Description: Protection of private life: Failure of authorities to provide adequate protection against domestic violence due to various shortcomings e.g. individual programme during prison EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10339
ADIYAMAN v. Turkey
ADIYAMAN v. Turkey TUR 09/01/2018 00:00:00 12/01/2018 10:16:53 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Unjustified and disproportionate interference due to disciplinary sanctions imposed on prisoners for having expressed peaceful opinions. Article 10 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48589
AGANIKYAN v. Armenia
AGANIKYAN v. Armenia ARM 05/04/2018 00:00:00 18/04/2018 09:59:17 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of criminal proceedings. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: Individual EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49313
AL-DULIMI AND MONTANA MANAGEMENT INC. v. Switzerland
AL DULIMI AND MONTANA MANAGEMENT INC. v. Switzerland CHE 21/06/2016 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:09:51 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Denial of access to a court due to the lack of adequate judicial scrutiny of freezing and confiscation procedures EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5846
ANCHUGOV AND GLADKOV v. Russia
ANCHUGOV AND GLADKOV v. Russia RUS 09/12/2013 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These two cases concern the blanket ban on voting rights imposed automatically pursuant to Article 32 3 of the Constitution on all convicted offenders deprived of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14110
ARCELORMITTAL AMBALAJ CELIGI SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI v. Ukraine
ARCELORMITTAL AMBALAJ CELIGI SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI v. Ukraine UKR 15/07/2021 00:00:00 06/08/2021 16:22:04 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Unfair civil proceedings on account of the domestic courts failure to address the applicant EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58183
ARMENIA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
ARMENIA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CAT/C/ARM/CO/4 NULL 2017 01 26T00:00:00 CAT United Nations CAT/C/ARM/CO/4 Convention against Torture Distr.: General 26 January 2017 and Other Cruel Inhuman or Degrading Treatment Original: English or Punishment Committee UHRICAT/C/ARM/CO/4https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/2c00e5eb-b65c-44c9-91b8-fda4bf8af126
Ad hoc Report on Greece (Rule 34)
Ad hoc Report on Greece Rule 34 GRC 2019 12 06 2019 12 18 Adoption: 6 December 2019 Public Publication: 18 December 2019 Greco AdHocRep 2019 2 Ad hoc Report on GREECE Rule 34 Adopted by GRECO at its 84th Plenary Meeting Strasbourg 2 6 December 2019 I. GRECOGreco-AdHocRep(2019)2-FINAL-eng-Greece-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-AdHocRep(2019)2-FINAL-eng-Greece-PUBLIC
Adelaida Kim v. Uzbekistan
Adelaida Kim v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/122/D/2175/2012 Communication number s : 2175/2012 Author: Adelaida Kim Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 122 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 05 Feb 2009 Date of decision 04 Apr 2018 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/122/D/2175/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2483/en-US
Anna Belousova v. Kazakhstan
Anna Belousova v. Kazakhstan CEDAW/C/61/D/45/2012 Communication number s : 045/2012 Author: Anna Belousova Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 61 Country Kazakhstan Submission date 12 Sep 2012 Date of decision 13 Jul 2015 Comment: This JUTBCEDAW/C/61/D/45/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2053/en-US
B.J. v. Denmark
B.J. v. Denmark CERD/C/56/D/17/1999 Communication number s : 17/1999 Author: B.J. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 56 Country Denmark Submission date 13 Jul 1999 Date of decision 17 Mar 2000 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCERD/C/56/D/17/1999https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3026/en-US
BEVACQUA AND S. v. Bulgaria
BEVACQUA AND S. v. Bulgaria BGR 12/09/2008 00:00:00 04/11/2016 14:50:56 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Failure to take appropriate action in the context of divorce proceedings in particular to decide rapidly on interim custody EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14743
BODROZIC v. Serbia
BODROZIC v. Serbia SRB 10/12/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 15:36:53 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to criminal sanctions for defamation imposed on journalists. Article 10 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-8751
BRANKO TOMASIC AND OTHERS v. Croatia
BRANKO TOMASIC AND OTHERS v. Croatia HRV 15/04/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:24:46 Case Description: Right to life: Failure to protect the lives of the applicants relatives from a person who had been previously convicted of threatening to kill them Branko EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10317
Bagale v. Nepal
Bagale v. Nepal CCPR/C/130/D/2777/2016 Communication number s : 2777/2016 Author: Hom Bahadur Bagale Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 130 Country Nepal Submission date 17 Dec 2015 Date of decision 02 Nov 2020 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/130/D/2777/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3277/en-US
Berik Zhagiparov v. Kazakhstan
Berik Zhagiparov v. Kazakhstan CCPR/C/124/D/2441/2014 Communication number s : 2441/2014 Author: Berik Zhagiparov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 124 Country Kazakhstan Submission date 12 Jun 2014 Date of decision 25 Oct 2018 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/124/D/2441/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2553/en-US
CASE OF A AND B v. NORWAY
CASE OF A AND B v. NORWAY 24130/11 29758/11 KJELDAHL R. NOR 11/15/2016 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 Right not to be tried or punished twice general Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 Right not to be tried or punished twice Criminal ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1115JUD002413011https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-168972
CASE OF A, B AND C v. IRELAND
CASE OF A B AND C v. IRELAND 25579/05 KAY J. IRL 12/16/2010 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed non exhaustion of domestic remedies Remainder inadmissible No violation of Art. 8 Violation of Art. 8 Non pecuniary damage award ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1216JUD002557905https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-102332