Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 2341 - 2360 of 2884
Gallego Díaz v. Spain
Gallego D az v. Spain CCPR/C/82/D/988/2001 Communication number s : 988/2001 Author: Mariano Gallego D az Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 82 Country Spain Submission date 28 Oct 1999 Date of decision 03 Nov 2004 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/82/D/988/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1127/en-US
Gaviria Lucas v. Colombia
Gaviria Lucas v. Colombia CCPR/C/97/D/1541/2007 Communication number s : 1541/2007 Author: Luis Carlos Gaviria Lucas Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 97 Country Colombia Submission date 01 Nov 2006 Date of decision 27 Oct 2009 JUTBCCPR/C/97/D/1541/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1549/en-US
Gilberg v. Germany
Gilberg v. Germany CCPR/C/87/D/1403/2005 Communication number s : 1403/2005 Author: Erich Gilberg Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 87 Country Germany Submission date 11 Feb 2005 Date of decision 25 Jul 2006 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/87/D/1403/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1266/en-US
Government comments on the first report on Serbia
Government comments on the first report on Serbia SRB 2007 12 14 2008 04 29 APPENDIX The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Serbia ECRI wishes to point out that the analysis contained in its ECRISRB-COM-III-2008-025-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=SRB-COM-III-2008-025-ENG
Government comments on the fourth report on Latvia
Government comments on the fourth report on Latvia LVA 2011 12 09 2012 02 21 Government comments on the report on LATVIA APPENDIX: GOVERNMENT S VIEWPOINT APPENDIXThe following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the ECRILVA-COM-IV-2012-003-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=LVA-COM-IV-2012-003-ENG
Government comments on the second report on Croatia
Government comments on the second report on Croatia HRV 2000 12 15 2001 07 03 The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Croatia. APPENDIX ECRI wishes to point out that the analysis contained in ECRIHRV-COM-II-2001-034-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=HRV-COM-II-2001-034-ENG
Government comments on the second report on Lithuania
Government comments on the second report on Lithuania LTU 2002 06 28 2003 04 15 The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Lithuania. APPENDIX 28 June 2002 In accordance with ECRI s country by ECRILTU-COM-II-2003-005-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=LTU-COM-II-2003-005-ENG
Government comments on the third report on Denmark
Government comments on the third report on Denmark DNK 2005 12 16 2006 05 16 APPENDIX The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Denmark ECRI wishes to point out that the analysis contained in ECRIDNK-COM-III-2006-018-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=DNK-COM-III-2006-018-ENG
Government comments on the third report on the Netherlands
Government comments on the third report on the Netherlands NLD 2007 06 29 2008 02 12 APPENDIX The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in the Netherlands ECRI wishes to point out that the analysis ECRINLD-COM-III-2008-003-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=NLD-COM-III-2008-003-ENG
Gryb v. Belarus
Gryb v. Belarus CCPR/C/103/D/1316/2004 Communication number s : 1316/2004 Author: Mecheslav Gryb Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 103 Country Belarus Submission date 09 Jul 2004 Date of decision 26 Oct 2011 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/103/D/1316/2004https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1225/en-US
Gueye et al. v. France
Gueye et al. v. France CCPR/C/35/D/196/1985 Communication number s : 196/1985 Author: Ibrahima Gueye and 742 other retired Senegalese members of the French army Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 35 Country France Submission date 12 Oct 1985 JUTBCCPR/C/35/D/196/1985https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/676/en-US
Hamulić et al. v. Bosnia and Herzegovina
Hamuli et al. v. Bosnia and Herzegovina CCPR/C/113/D/2022/2011 Communication number s : 2022/2011 Author: Nura Hamuli and Halima Hod i Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 113 Country Bosnia and Herzegovina Submission date 18 Nov 2010 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/113/D/2022/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1992/en-US
Hart v. Australia
Hart v. Australia CCPR/C/70/D/947/2000 Communication number s : 947/2000 Author: Barry Hart Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 70 Country Australia Submission date 31 Jan 2000 Date of decision 25 Oct 2000 Comment: Under rule 85 of the JUTBCCPR/C/70/D/947/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/906/en-US
Henry v. Trinidad and Tobago
Henry v. Trinidad and Tobago CCPR/C/65/D/751/1997 Communication number s : 752/1997 Author: Allan Henry Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 65 Country Trinidad and Tobago Submission date 09 Sep 1996 Date of decision 03 Nov 1998 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/65/D/751/1997https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/815/en-US
Hesse v. Australia
Hesse v. Australia CCPR/C/75/D/1087/2002 Communication number s : 1087/2002 Author: Peter Hesse Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 75 Country Australia Submission date 26 Feb 2001 Date of decision 15 Jul 2002 Comment: Pursuant to rule JUTBCCPR/C/75/D/1087/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1014/en-US
Hinostroza Solís v. Peru
Hinostroza Sol s v. Peru CCPR/C/86/D/1016/2001 Communication number s : 1016/2001 Author: Rub n Santiago Hinostroza Sol s Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 86 Country Peru Submission date 19 Jul 1999 Date of decision 27 Mar 2006 Comment: An JUTBCCPR/C/86/D/1016/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1265/en-US
Hoofdman v. Netherlands
Hoofdman v. Netherlands CCPR/C/64/D/602/1994 Communication number s : 602/1994 Author: Cornelis Hoofdman Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 64 Country Netherlands Submission date 26 May 1994 Date of decision 03 Nov 1998 Comment: Individual JUTBCCPR/C/64/D/602/1994https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/761/en-US
Human Rights Council adopts outcome of Universal Periodic Review on the Philippines, Algeria and Poland
Human Rights Council AFTERNOON 20 September 2012 The Human Rights Council this afternoon adopted the outcome of the Universal Periodic Review on the Philippines Algeria and Poland. Teofilo S. Pilando Deputy Executive Secretary Vice Minister Office of the UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2012/09/human-rights-council-adopts-outcome-universal-periodic-review-philippines
Ičić v. Bosnia and Herzegovina
I i v. Bosnia and Herzegovina CCPR/C/113/D/2028/2011 Communication number s : 2028/2011 Author: Mevlida I i Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 113 Country Bosnia and Herzegovina Submission date 10 Dec 2010 Date of decision 30 Mar 2015 JUTBCCPR/C/113/D/2028/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1993/en-US
ICHTIGIAROGLOU v. Greece
ICHTIGIAROGLOU v. Greece GRC 01/12/2008 00:00:00 04/11/2016 16:42:14 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of property: Unnecessary interference due to the cancellation of the applicant s right to an old age EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-15597