Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1481 - 1500 of 1823
Jansen-Gielen v. Netherlands
Jansen Gielen v. Netherlands CCPR/C/71/D/846/1999 Communication number s : 846/1999 Author: Gertruda Hubertina Jansen Gielen Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 71 Country Netherlands Submission date 07 Aug 1998 Date of decision 03 Apr 2001 JUTBCCPR/C/71/D/846/1999https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/917/en-US
Jongenburger-Veerman v. Netherlands
Jongenburger Veerman v. Netherlands CCPR/C/85/D/1238/2004 Communication number s : 1238/2004 Author: G. J. Jongenburger Veerman Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 85 Country Netherlands Submission date 07 Nov 2003 Date of decision 01 Nov 2005 JUTBCCPR/C/85/D/1238/2004https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/989/en-US
Joslin et al. v. New Zealand
Joslin et al. v. New Zealand CCPR/C/75/D/902/1999 Communication number s : 902/1999 Author: Juliet Joslin Jennifer Rowan Margaret Pearl and Lindsay Zelf Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 75 Country New Zealand Submission date 30 Nov 1998 JUTBCCPR/C/75/D/902/1999https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/995/en-US
K. A. v. Azerbaijan,Sweden
K. A. v. Azerbaijan Sweden CAT/C/39/D/308/2006 Communication number s : 308/2006 Author: K. A. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 39 Country Azerbaijan Sweden Submission date 16 Oct 2006 Date of decision 16 Nov 2007 Comment: This JUTBCAT/C/39/D/308/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/89/en-US
K.P. v. Finland
K.P. v. Finland FIN 31/08/2001 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:14:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair administrative proceedings due to the failure to communicate to the applicant the opinions obtained ex officio concerning EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4812
KARANOVIC v. Bosnia and Herzegovina
KARANOVIC v. Bosnia and Herzegovina BIH 20/02/2008 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:13:46 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice protection of property and discrimination: Failure to enforce a court decision which ordered the transfer of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4143
KLEIN v. Austria
KLEIN v. Austria AUT 03/06/2011 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Protection of property: Deprivation of a lawyer who had lost the right to practice as a result of bankruptcy proceedings and a criminal conviction of all entitlements to a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-961
KYRGYZSTAN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
KYRGYZSTAN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS E/C.12/KGZ/CO/2 3 NULL 2015 07 06T00:00:00 CESCR United Nations E/C.12/KGZ/CO/2 3 Economic and Social Council Distr.: General 7 July 2015 Original: English Committee on Economic Social and Cultural Rights Concluding UHRIE/C.12/KGZ/CO/2-3https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/8074ca74-524c-4fc4-b76b-39cad4d94c6a
Kenneth Moylan v. Australia
Kenneth Moylan v. Australia CERD/C/83/D/47/2010 Communication number s : 047/2010 Author: Kenneth Moylan Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 83 Country Australia Submission date 19 Apr 2010 Date of decision 27 Aug 2013 Comment: This JUTBCERD/C/83/D/47/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1729/en-US
Khaoukha Marouf v. Algeria
Khaoukha Marouf v. Algeria CCPR/C/110/D/1889/2009 Communication number s : 1889/2009 Author: Khaoukha Marouf represented by Track Impunity Always TRIAL Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 110 Country Algeria Submission date 30 Jan 2009 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/110/D/1889/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1803/en-US
LAKICEVIC v. Montenegro and Serbia
LAKICEVIC v. Montenegro and Serbia MNE 13/03/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 17:36:39 Case Description: Protection of property: Suspension of pension rights due part time work in legal practices Status of Execution: The payment of pensions in respect of all EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-11160
LATVIA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
LATVIA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CRPD/C/LVA/CO/1 NULL 2017 10 10T00:00:00 CRPD United Nations CRPD/C/LVA/CO/1 Convention on the Rights Distr.: General 10 October 2017 of Persons with Disabilities Original: English Committee on the Rights of Persons with UHRICRPD/C/LVA/CO/1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/7153a0cf-1c11-427e-9862-8e2b292baf53
LEARY v. the United Kingdom
LEARY v. the United Kingdom GBR 25/07/2000 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Discrimination / protection of property: Discriminatory treatment on the ground of sex as social security benefits for widowed parents were only available to women. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2586
LEONI v. Italy
LEONI v. Italy ITA 02/03/2023 00:00:00 06/03/2023 09:48:32 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair proceedings due to the adoption and application of new legislation to on going court proceedings concerning the calculation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-62723
LITHUANIA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
LITHUANIA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS E/C.12/LTU/CO/2 NULL 2014 06 23T00:00:00 CESCR United Nations E/C.12/LTU/CO/2 Economic and Social Council Distr.: General 24 June 2014 Original: English Committee on Economic Social and Cultural Rights Concluding UHRIE/C.12/LTU/CO/2https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/29ae7daa-555f-4645-9cc0-cbe1123159d3
LOFFELMAN v. the United Kingdom
LOFFELMAN v. the United Kingdom GBR 26/03/2002 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Discrimination / protection of property: Discriminatory treatment on the ground of sex as social security benefits for widowed parents were only available to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2622
LOGOTHETIS v. Greece
LOGOTHETIS v. Greece GRC 12/07/2001 00:00:00 07/11/2016 09:36:22 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of property: Non enforcement judgments of the Court of Audit granting the applicants the first a retired judge EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-22206
Lanzarote Sánchez et al. v. Spain
Lanzarote S nchez et al. v. Spain CCPR/C/87/D/1212/2003 Communication number s : 1212/2003 Author: Mar a Concepci n Lanzarote S nchez Mar a del Pilar Lanzarote S nchez and ngel Ra l Lanzarote S nchez Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No JUTBCCPR/C/87/D/1212/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1276/en-US
M.I.A.P. v. Spain
M.I.A.P. v. Spain CCPR/C/131/D/2558/2015 Communication number s : 2558/2015 Author: M.I.A.P. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 131 Country Spain Submission date 18 Dec 2014 Date of decision 15 Mar 2021 Comment: Individual opinion of JUTBCCPR/C/131/D/2558/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3488/en-US
MAGGIO AND OTHERS v. Italy
MAGGIO AND OTHERS v. Italy ITA 31/08/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:13:26 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair proceedings due to the adoption and application of new legislation to on going court proceedings concerning the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28284