Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 8881 - 8900 of 8937
X AND Y v. Romania
X AND Y v. Romania ROU 19/04/2021 00:00:00 30/04/2021 16:08:47 Case Description: The case concerns the State s failure to fulfil its positive obligation to ensure respect for private live on account of the absence of a clear and foreseeable legal EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57459
X, Y, A, B, C and D v. Greece
X Y A B C and D v. Greece CCPR/C/126/D/2701/2015 Communication number s : 2701/2015 Author: X Y A B C and D Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 126 Country Greece Submission date 25 Sep 2015 Date of decision 26 Jul 2019 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/126/D/2701/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2899/en-US
X.Y. v. Hungary
X.Y. v. Hungary HUN 19/06/2013 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: Group of cases concerning different violations of the applicants right to liberty and security on account of a their unlawful detention Article 5 1 b their unreasonably long pre EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-11104
X. and Y. v. Canada
X. and Y. v. Canada CCPR/C/118/D/2771/2016 Communication number s : 2771/2016 Author: X. and Y. Type of decision: Admissibility decision Session No 118 Country Canada Submission date 22 Mar 2016 Date of decision 03 Nov 2016 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/118/D/2771/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2130/en-US
X and Y v. Switzerland
X and Y v. Switzerland CAT/C/66/D/776/2016 Communication number s : 776/2016 Author: X and Y represented by counsel Marcel Zirngast Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 66 Country Switzerland Submission date 19 Oct 2016 Date of decision 23 Apr JUTBCAT/C/66/D/776/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2581/en-US
X. v. Argentina
X. v. Argentina CRPD/C/11/D/8/2012 Communication number s : 008/2012 Author: X. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 16 Country Argentina Submission date 22 Jun 2012 Date of decision 11 Apr 2014 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCRPD/C/11/D/8/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1989/en-US
X v. Finland
X v. Finland FIN 19/11/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:19:54 Case Description: This case concerns the involuntary confinement of the applicant for care in a mental hospital between 17 February 2005 and 27 January 2006 without sufficient safeguards against EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5984
X v. Lithuania
X v. Lithuania CCPR/C/125/D/2564/2015 Communication number s : 2564/2015 Author: X Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 125 Country Lithuania Submission date 14 Aug 2014 Date of decision 29 Mar 2019 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/125/D/2564/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3318/en-US
X v. Netherlands
X v. Netherlands CAT/C/68/D/863/2018 Communication number s : 863/2018 Author: X represented by counsel Igna Oomen Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 68 Country Netherlands Submission date 12 Jan 2018 Date of decision 05 Dec 2019 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/68/D/863/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2700/en-US
X v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
X v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia MKD 17/04/2019 00:00:00 04/07/2019 17:16:59 Case Description: The case concerns a violation of the transgender applicant s right to respect for his private life on account of the absence of quick transparent EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52421
Y AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria
Y AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria BGR 05/09/2022 00:00:00 19/09/2022 09:34:09 Case Description: This case concerns the authorities failure to protect the life of a woman who was a victim of domestic violence had filed several complaints stating that she feared for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-61103
Y.B. and N.S. v. Belgium
Y.B. and N.S. v. Belgium CRC/C/79/D/12/2017 Communication number s : 012/2017 Author: Y.B. and N.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 79 Country Belgium Submission date 22 Mar 2017 Date of decision 27 Sep 2018 Comment: This document has no JUTBCRC/C/79/D/12/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2421/en-US
Y.G.H. et al v. Australia
Y.G.H. et al v. Australia CAT/C/51/D/434/2010 Communication number s : 434/2010 Author: Y.G.H. et al Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 51 Country Australia Submission date 24 Oct 2010 Date of decision 14 Nov 2013 Comment: This document has JUTBCAT/C/51/D/434/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/7/en-US
Y.H.A. v. Australia
Y.H.A. v. Australia CAT/C/27/D/162/2000 Communication number s : 162/2000 Author: Y.H.A. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 27 Country Australia Submission date 14 Apr 2000 Date of decision 23 Nov 2001 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/27/D/162/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/195/en-US
Y.S. v. Russia
Y.S. v. Russia RUS 30/03/2021 00:00:00 06/04/2021 20:53:01 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Unlawful deprivation of liberty on account of a person s involuntary placement in a psychiatric hospital due to the authorities failure to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57213
Y.T. v. Bulgaria
Y.T. v. Bulgaria BGR 09/10/2020 00:00:00 03/11/2020 18:11:46 Case Description: This case concerns the unjustified refusal of the District Court and Regional Court of Stara Zagora in 2015 and 2016 to grant the applicant who is a transsexual his EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56173
Y.U. v. Russia
Y.U. v. Russia RUS 13/02/2013 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: Violation of the applicant s right to respect for her family life Article 8 on account of the non enforcement of the judgment taken by the Moscow courts in 2008 2009 ordering EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14038
YAKHYMOVYCH v. Ukraine
YAKHYMOVYCH v. Ukraine UKR 09/05/2022 00:00:00 02/06/2022 14:41:20 Case Description: The case concerns allegations of police entrapment raised by the applicant in the course of criminal proceedings against him instituted in 2012 in relation to an attempt EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-60389
YAKOVENKO v. Ukraine
YAKOVENKO v. Ukraine UKR 25/01/2008 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: These cases mainly concern inhuman and/or degrading treatment due to overcrowding poor material conditions and inadequate nutrition in police establishments pre trial EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31204
YAKUSHCHENKO v. Ukraine
YAKUSHCHENKO v. Ukraine UKR 24/10/2019 00:00:00 18/11/2019 16:25:04 Case Description: Lack of a fair trial due to the domestic courts failure to consider an argument of substance advanced by the applicants which may have been decisive for the outcome of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54175