Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1821 - 1840 of 1854
Third Opinion on Moldova
Third Opinion on Moldova MDA ACFC/OP/III 2009 003 2009 06 26 Strasbourg 11 December 2009 ACFC/OP/III 2009 003 ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES Third Opinion on Moldova adopted on 26 June 2009 FCNMACFC/OP/III(2009)003https://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=3rd_OP_Moldova_en
Third Opinion on Montenegro
Third Opinion on Montenegro MNE ACFC/OP/III 2019 001rev 2019 03 07 2019 10 02 ACFC/OP/III 2019 001rev ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES Third Opinion on Montenegro Adopted on 7 March 2019 EXECUTIVE FCNMACFC/OP/III(2019)001revhttps://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=3rd_OP_Montenegro_en
Third Opinion on Spain
Third Opinion on Spain ESP ACFC/OP/III 2012 003 2012 03 22 Strasbourg 13 November 2012 Public ACFC/OP/III 2012 003 ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES Third Opinion on Spain adopted on 22 March 2012 FCNMACFC/OP/III(2012)003https://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=3rd_OP_Spain_en
Third Opinion on Ukraine
Third Opinion on Ukraine UKR ACFC/OP/III 2012 002 2012 03 22 Strasbourg 28 March 2013 Public ACFC/OP/III 2012 002 ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES Third Opinion on Ukraine adopted on 22 March 2012 FCNMACFC/OP/III(2012)002https://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=3rd_OP_Ukraine_en
Third Opinion on the Czech Republic
Third Opinion on the Czech Republic CZE ACFC/OP/III 2011 008 2011 07 01 Strasbourg 19 March 2012 Public ACFC/OP/III 2011 008 ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES Third Opinion on the Czech Republic FCNMACFC/OP/III(2011)008https://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=3rd_OP_CzechRepublic_en
Third Opinion on the Slovak Republic
Third Opinion on the Slovak Republic SVK ACFC/OP/III 2010 004 2010 05 28 Strasbourg 18 January 2011 Public ACFC/OP/III 2010 004 ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES Third Opinion on the Slovak Republic FCNMACFC/OP/III(2010)004https://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=3rd_OP_SlovakRepublic_en
Third Opinion on “the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia”
Third Opinion on the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia MKDMDN ACFC/OP/III 2011 001 2011 03 30 Strasbourg 7 December 2011 Public ACFC/OP/III 2011 001 ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES Third Opinion FCNMACFC/OP/III(2011)001https://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=3rd_OP_FYROM_en
Third Thematic Commentary
Third Thematic Commentary ACFC/44DOC 2012 001rev 2012 05 24 2012 07 05 Strasbourg 5 July 2012 Public ACFC/44DOC 2012 001rev ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES THEMATIC COMMENTARY No. 3 THE LANGUAGE FCNMACFC/44DOC(2012)001revhttps://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=Third_Thematic_Commentary_EN
Thirtheenth Activity Report (2020-2022)
Thirtheenth Activity Report 2020 2022 ACFC/DOC/ 2022 8 add 2022 05 19 2022 09 27 Restricted ACFC/DOC/ 2022 8 add 31 May 2022 13th Activity Report of the ACFC 1 June 2020 31 May 2022 Text as adopted at the 75th Plenary on 19 May 2022 Foreword by the FCNMACFC/DOC/(2022)8_addhttps://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=13th_Activity_Report_2020_2022
Twelfth Activity Report (2018-2020)
Twelfth Activity Report 2018 2020 ACFC/DOC 2020 2 2020 05 26 2020 11 25 ACFC/DOC 2020 2 Restricted 26 May 2020 Twelfth activity report covering the period 1 June 2018 31 May 2020 Adopted on 26 May 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE FCNMACFC/DOC(2020)2https://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=12th_Activity_Report_2018_2020
ULKE v. Turkey
ULKE v. Turkey TUR 24/04/2006 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:04:14 Case Description: These cases concern the applicants repetitive prosecutions and convictions for refusing to carry out compulsory military service as pacifists and conscientious objectors EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37268
UMO ILINDEN AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria
UMO ILINDEN AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria BGR 19/04/2006 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: These cases concern the unjustified refusals of the courts between 1999 and 2015 to register associations the aim of which is to achieve the recognition of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3657
UN Human Rights Recommendations to the Syrian Arab Republic: The Second Cycle of The Universal Periodic Review (2016)
The Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights OHCHR for Syria is pleased to provide this compilation of human rights recommendations made to the Syrian Arab Republic in 2016 in the context of the second Universal Periodic Review UPR UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/compilations/un-human-rights-recommendations-syrian-arab-republic-second-cycle-universal
UPR Trust Funds: achievements, good practices and lessons learned over the past 15 years and optimized support to States in the implementation of recommendations emanating from the fourth cycle
In three cycles since its establishment by the Human Rights Council the UPR has evolved into a unique peer review process to prepare for to undergo and to support a comprehensive and consistently regular check up of the status of human rights in all UN UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/statements/2023/03/upr-trust-funds-achievements-good-practices-and-lessons-learned-over-past-15
URECHEAN AND PAVLICENCO v. the Republic of Moldova
URECHEAN AND PAVLICENCO v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 20/04/2015 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: Violation of the applicants right of access to court on account of the refusal by the domestic courts in 2005 and 2007 respectively to examine EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6844
Universal Periodic Review - A Practical Guide for Civil Society
This Guide explains the Universal Periodic Review mechanism through which the Human Rights Council reviews on a periodic basis the fulfilment by each of the 193 United Nations Member States of their human rights obligations and commitments. It explains UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/publications/policy-and-methodological-publications/universal-periodic-review-practical-guide-civil
Universal Periodic Review Working Group to commence fourth cycle with holding of its forty-first session from 7 to 18 November 2022
GENEVA 2 November 2022 The forty first session of the Human Rights Council s Universal Periodic Review UPR Working Group will be held in Geneva from 7 to 18 November during which 14 States will have their human rights records examined. The holding of this UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2022/11/universal-periodic-review-working-group-commence-fourth-cycle-holding-its
Universal Periodic Review Working Group to examine human rights records of 13 States at its forty-second session from 23 January to 3 February 2023
GENEVA 18 January 2023 The forty second session of the Human Rights Council s Universal Periodic Review UPR Working Group will be held in Geneva from 23 January to 3 February 2023 during which 13 States will have their human rights records examined. The UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2023/01/universal-periodic-review-working-group-examine-human-rights-records-13
V.D. v. Russian Federation
V.D. v. Russian Federation CCPR/C/116/D/2198/2012 Communication number s : 2198/2012 Author: V.D. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 116 Country Russian Federation Submission date 23 Sep 2012 Date of decision 30 Mar 2016 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/116/D/2198/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3090/en-US
VISIT TO COLOMBIA : REPORT OF THE SPECIAL RAPPORTEUR ON THE SITUATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENDERS
VISIT TO COLOMBIA : REPORT OF THE SPECIAL RAPPORTEUR ON THE SITUATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENDERS A/HRC/43/51/ADD.1 NULL 2019 12 26T00:00:00 SR HR Defenders United Nations A/HRC/43/51/Add.1 General Assembly Distr.: General 26 December 2019 English Original: UHRIA/HRC/43/51/ADD.1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/adcb99ad-3205-45ec-ba95-fca9bc7d25c9