Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 2835
A. AND B. v. Montenegro
A. AND B. v. Montenegro MNE 05/06/2013 00:00:00 02/11/2016 17:36:39 Case Description: Unlawful interference with possessions: The applicants foreign currency savings have never been registered and converted into the public debt contrary to the domestic EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-11152
AFANASYEV v. Ukraine
AFANASYEV v. Ukraine UKR 05/07/2005 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These cases concern physical or psychological torture and/or ill treatment by the police mostly in order to obtain confessions substantive violations of Article 3 lack of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31348
AGGUL AND AL v. Turkey
AGGUL AND AL v. Turkey TUR 22/05/2001 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:10:46 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment right to liberty and security protection of private and family life etc.: The applicants complained i.a. about their eviction from their EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28713
AGRATI AND OTHERS v. Italy
AGRATI AND OTHERS v. Italy ITA 28/11/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:13:26 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the retroactive application of Law No. 266/2005 to pending judicial proceedings concerning the approximately 310 applicants length of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28264
AGROKOMPLEKS v. Ukraine
AGROKOMPLEKS v. Ukraine UKR 08/03/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair insolvency proceedings against an oil refinery in which the State was a major shareholder due to the lack of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31565
ANASTASOV v. North Macedonia
ANASTASOV v. North Macedonia MKD 26/09/2019 00:00:00 03/10/2019 11:22:51 Case Description: This case concerns a violation of the applicant s right to peaceful enjoyment of his possessions on account of confiscation of his vehicle within the context of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52869
ANONYMOS TOURISTIKI ETAIRIA XENODOCHEIA KRITIS v. Greece
ANONYMOS TOURISTIKI ETAIRIA XENODOCHEIA KRITIS v. Greece GRC 21/05/2008 00:00:00 07/11/2016 09:36:22 Case Description: Interference with the company s right to peaceful enjoyment of its possessions: failure of the Supreme Administrative Council to take EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-22352
ANTONYAN v. Armenia
ANTONYAN v. Armenia ARM 02/01/2013 00:00:00 24/10/2016 18:33:58 Case Description: Unlawful interference with the right of peaceful enjoyment of possessions: Authorities required flat owner to pay compensation in order to terminate an alleged right of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-425
ASITO v. the Republic of Moldova
ASITO v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 08/02/2006 00:00:00 02/11/2016 11:48:46 Case Description: Breach right to a fair hearing and the principle of legal certainty and interference with the right to peaceful enjoyment of possessions: Quashing of two final EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7510
AYGORDU AND AL v. Turkey
AYGORDU AND AL v. Turkey TUR 22/05/2001 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:10:46 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment right to liberty and security protection of private and family life etc.: The applicants complained i.a. about their eviction from EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28711
AZALIYA, TOV v. Ukraine
AZALIYA TOV v. Ukraine UKR 09/03/2023 00:00:00 20/03/2023 09:18:50 Case Description: Interference with the applicant companies peaceful enjoyment of its possessions devoid of any legal basis and incompatible with the principle of the rule of law EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-62845
Achabal Puertas v. Spain
Achabal Puertas v. Spain CCPR/C/107/D/1945/2010 Communication number s : 1945/2010 Author: Mar a Cruz Achabal Puertas Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 107 Country Spain Submission date 02 Nov 2009 Date of decision 27 Mar 2013 Comment: The JUTBCCPR/C/107/D/1945/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1317/en-US
Agabekova v. Uzbekistan
Agabekova v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/89/D/1071/2002 Communication number s : 1071/2002 Author: Nadezhda Agabekova Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 89 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 11 Apr 2002 Date of decision 16 Mar 2007 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/89/D/1071/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1340/en-US
Aliyev et al. v. Azerbaijan
Aliyev et al. v. Azerbaijan CCPR/C/131/D/2805/2016 Communication number s : 2805/2016 Author: Aziz Aliyev Jeyhun Aliyev Vagif Aliyev Gamar Aliyeva Havva Aliyeva and Yevdokiya Sobko Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 131 Country Azerbaijan JUTBCCPR/C/131/D/2805/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3199/en-US
BERZINS AND OTHERS v. Latvia
BERZINS AND OTHERS v. Latvia LVA 21/12/2021 00:00:00 10/01/2022 09:21:48 Case Description: The present case concerns an interference with the applicants right to the peaceful enjoyment of their possessions as they have been unable to use or access their EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59297
BIONDIC v. Croatia
BIONDIC v. Croatia HRV 02/06/2008 00:00:00 03/11/2016 16:22:41 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of access to a court in civil proceedings instituted by a third party to contest an inheritance due to the rejection of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12199
BORA v. Turkey
BORA v. Turkey TUR 09/05/2010 00:00:00 28/10/2016 15:13:12 Case Description: Interference with right to peaceful enjoyment of possessions: Failure by domestic authorities to enforce a final judgment and stay of execution order of the Administrative Court EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5610
BORZHONOV v. Russia
BORZHONOV v. Russia RUS 22/04/2009 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases mainly concerns the authorities failure to respect the applicants right to peaceful enjoyment of possessions due to the retention of their property EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13819
BREZOVEC v. Croatia
BREZOVEC v. Croatia HRV 29/06/2011 00:00:00 03/11/2016 16:22:41 Case Description: Interference with peaceful enjoyment of possessions: Refusal by authorities in contravention to previously established case law of the Constitutional Court to let the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12467
BUCEAS AND BUCIAS v. Romania
BUCEAS AND BUCIAS v. Romania ROU 01/10/2014 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:30:01 Case Description: Interference with peaceful enjoyment of possessions: After having obtained the annulment of the forced sale of their property in a fist action rejection of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17411