Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 2661 - 2680 of 2835
LELAS v. Croatia
LELAS v. Croatia HRV 20/08/2010 00:00:00 03/11/2016 16:22:41 Case Description: Unlawful interference with right to the peaceful enjoyment of possessions: Dismissal of the applicants claims for daily allowances for work in demining operations as time EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12463
LIMAN-IS SENDIKASI (NO 1) v. Turkey
LIMAN IS SENDIKASI NO 1 v. Turkey TUR 11/04/2011 00:00:00 09/02/2018 16:41:55 Case Description: The case of Liman Is 29608/05 concerns a violation of the right to a fair trial on account of the failure of the national authorities to enforce final EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37182
Lnenicka v. Czech Republic
Lnenicka v. Czech Republic CCPR/C/92/D/1484/2006 Communication number s : 1484/2006 Author: Josef Lnenicka Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 92 Country Czech Republic Submission date 09 Feb 2006 Date of decision 25 Mar 2008 Comment: The text JUTBCCPR/C/92/D/1484/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1409/en-US
Loth v. Germany
Loth v. Germany CCPR/C/98/D/1754/2008 Communication number s : 1754/2008 Author: Edith Loth and her heirs Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 98 Country Germany Submission date 29 May 2007 Date of decision 23 Mar 2010 Comment: An JUTBCCPR/C/98/D/1754/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1578/en-US
MAKAROVA v. Russia
MAKAROVA v. Russia RUS 01/01/2010 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the State s failure to assist the applicants in securing enforcement of judgments delivered in their favour in the proceedings they initiated EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14100
MEGADAT.COM SRL v. the Republic of Moldova
MEGADAT.COM SRL v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 08/07/2008 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the violation of the applicant companies right to peaceful enjoyment of their possessions on account of arbitrary and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6814
MIHALEVI v. Bulgaria
MIHALEVI v. Bulgaria BGR 21/06/2018 00:00:00 29/06/2018 15:03:37 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference in the applicants right to peaceful enjoyment of possessions due to the loss of the possibility to obtain compensation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49751
MILADINOV AND OTHERS v. "THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA"
MILADINOV AND OTHERS v. THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA 46398/09 50570/09 50576/09 GODZO D. GODZO A. MKD 4/24/2014 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 5 Right to liberty and security Article 5 3 Reasonableness of pre trial detention Violation of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0424JUD004639809https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-142521
Mbenge v. Democratic Republic of the Congo
Mbenge v. Democratic Republic of the Congo CCPR/C/18/D/16/1977 Communication number s : 016/1977 Author: Daniel Monguya Mbenge Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 18 Country Democratic Republic of the Congo Submission date 08 Sep 1977 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/18/D/16/1977https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/573/en-US
Morrison (Everton) v. Jamaica
Morrison Everton v. Jamaica CCPR/C/63/D/635/1995 Communication number s : 635/1995 Author: Everton Morrison Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 63 Country Jamaica Submission date 14 Jun 1995 Date of decision 27 Jul 1998 Comment: Individual JUTBCCPR/C/63/D/635/1995https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/352/en-US
Munaf v. Iraq,Romania
Munaf v. Iraq Romania CCPR/C/96/D/1539/2006 Communication number s : 1539/2006 Author: Mohammad Munaf Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 96 Country Iraq Romania Submission date 13 Dec 2006 Date of decision 30 Jul 2009 Comment: Pursuant to JUTBCCPR/C/96/D/1539/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1517/en-US
N.S. v. Australia
N.S. v. Australia CAT/C/71/D/884/2018 Communication number s : 884/2018 Author: N.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 71 Country Australia Submission date 10 Sep 2018 Date of decision 21 Jul 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/71/D/884/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3367/en-US
NACAKIS v. Türkiye
NACAKIS v. T rkiye TUR 29/11/2022 00:00:00 05/12/2022 18:05:55 Case Description: The case concerns a violation of the right to peaceful enjoyment of possessions on account of the inability to inherit real estate in T rkiye due to the reciprocity EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-61980
NATIONAL MOVEMENT EKOGLASNOST v. Bulgaria
NATIONAL MOVEMENT EKOGLASNOST v. Bulgaria BGR 15/03/2021 00:00:00 06/04/2021 20:53:01 Case Description: This case concerns an infringement of the applicant association s right to peaceful of its possessions due to an order to pay lawyer s fees in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57167
NESIC v. Montenegro
NESIC v. Montenegro MNE 09/09/2020 00:00:00 23/09/2020 10:56:42 Case Description: This case concerns an unlawful interference with the applicant s right to the peaceful enjoyment of his possessions on account of deprivation of land he owned on the coast EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55927
NOVOSELETSKIY v. Ukraine
NOVOSELETSKIY v. Ukraine UKR 22/05/2005 00:00:00 07/11/2016 17:02:34 Case Description: Lacking protection of the right to respect for home private and family life and interference with right to enjoy his possessions: Eviction from a State owned flat which EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-26440
OLARU v. the Republic of Moldova
OLARU v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 28/10/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: Structural problem highlighted by the Court applying the pilot judgment procedure: violations of the applicants right of access to a court and right to peaceful EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7092
OTAVA v. the Czech Republic
OTAVA v. the Czech Republic CZE 27/08/2010 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:27:14 Case Description: Interference with peaceful enjoyment of possessions: Excessive burden due to deprivation of property acquired in good faith without adequate compensation Status of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6184
PERO MARIC v. Croatia
PERO MARIC v. Croatia HRV 17/03/2022 00:00:00 17/03/2022 16:35:22 Case Description: This case concerns the violation of the applicant s right of peaceful enjoyment of possessions due to the failure of the domestic courts to compensate him in proceedings EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59907
PLATAKOU v. Greece
PLATAKOU v. Greece GRC 06/09/2001 00:00:00 07/11/2016 09:36:22 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of property: Denial of access to a court erroneous dismissal of an application for compensation for expropriated EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-22174