Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 261 - 280 of 13414
Ayas v. Sweden
Ayas v. Sweden CAT/C/21/D/97/1997 Communication number s : 097/1997 Author: Orhan Ayas Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 21 Country Sweden Submission date 12 Nov 1997 Date of decision 12 Nov 1998 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/21/D/97/1997https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/255/en-US
B.A. et al. v. Austria
B.A. et al. v. Austria CCPR/C/127/D/2956/2017 Communication number s : 2956/2017 Author: B.A. et al. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 127 Country Austria Submission date 08 Feb 2017 Date of decision 08 Nov 2019 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/127/D/2956/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2805/en-US
B. & C. v. Czech Republic
B. C. v. Czech Republic CCPR/C/113/D/1967/2010 Communication number s : 1967/2010 Author: B. and C. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 113 Country Czech Republic Submission date 18 Sep 2009 Date of decision 02 Apr 2015 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/113/D/1967/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1944/en-US
B.J. v. Denmark
B.J. v. Denmark CERD/C/56/D/17/1999 Communication number s : 17/1999 Author: B.J. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 56 Country Denmark Submission date 13 Jul 1999 Date of decision 17 Mar 2000 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCERD/C/56/D/17/1999https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3026/en-US
B. K. v. Czech Republic
B. K. v. Czech Republic CCPR/C/105/D/1844/2008 Communication number s : 1844/2008 Author: B. K. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 105 Country Czech Republic Submission date 30 Apr 2008 Date of decision 23 Jul 2012 Comment: Pursuant to JUTBCCPR/C/105/D/1844/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1342/en-US
B.K. v. Norway
B.K. v. Norway CAT/C/62/D/722/2015 Communication number s : 722/2015 Author: B.K. not represented by counsel Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 62 Country Norway Submission date 21 Dec 2015 Date of decision 04 Dec 2017 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/62/D/722/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2414/en-US
B.M.I. and N.A.K. v. Denmark
B.M.I. and N.A.K. v. Denmark CCPR/C/118/D/2569/2015 Communication number s : 2569/2015 Author: B.M.I. and N.A.K. represented by counsel Hannah Krog Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 118 Country Denmark Submission date 06 Feb 2015 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/118/D/2569/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2229/en-US
B.M.S. v. Sweden
B.M.S. v. Sweden CAT/C/56/D/594/2014 Communication number s : 594/2014 Author: B.M.S. not represented by counsel Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 56 Country Sweden Submission date 09 Feb 2014 Date of decision 25 Nov 2015 Comment: Non JUTBCAT/C/56/D/594/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2079/en-US
B.M.S. v. Sweden
B.M.S. v. Sweden CAT/C/49/D/437/2010 Communication number s : 437/2010 Author: B.M.S. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 49 Country Sweden Submission date 10 Aug 2010 Date of decision 12 Nov 2012 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/49/D/437/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/17/en-US
B. M. v. Switzerland
B. M. v. Switzerland CEDAW/C/83/D/132/2018 Communication number s : 132/2018 Author: B. M. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 83 Country Switzerland Submission date 09 Aug 2018 Date of decision 17 Oct 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCEDAW/C/83/D/132/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3557/en-US
B.N. and S.R. v. Burundi
B.N. and S.R. v. Burundi CAT/C/71/D/858/2018 Communication number s : 858/2018 Author: B.N. and S.R. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 71 Country Burundi Submission date 22 Dec 2017 Date of decision 19 Jul 2021 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/71/D/858/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3375/en-US
B.R. v. Italy
B.R. v. Italy CAT/C/57/D/598/2014 Communication number s : 598/2014 Author: B.R. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 57 Country Italy Submission date 15 Jan 2014 Date of decision 29 Apr 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/57/D/598/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2119/en-US
B.S.S. v. Canada
B.S.S. v. Canada CAT/C/32/D/183/2001 Communication number s : 183/2001 Author: B.S.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 32 Country Canada Submission date 07 Mar 2001 Date of decision 12 May 2004 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/32/D/183/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/149/en-US
B.S. and N.K. v. Canada
B.S. and N.K. v. Canada CAT/C/71/D/798/2017 Communication number s : 798/2017 Author: B.S. and N.K. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 71 Country Canada Submission date 13 Jan 2017 Date of decision 23 Jul 2020 Comment: Individual JUTBCAT/C/71/D/798/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3425/en-US
B.S. v. Austria
B.S. v. Austria CAT/C/75/D/1118/2022 Communication number s : 1118/2022 Author: B.S. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 75 Country Austria Submission date 08 Dec 2021 Date of decision 04 Nov 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/75/D/1118/2022https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3619/en-US
B.V. v. Belgium
B.V. v. Belgium BEL 02/08/2017 00:00:00 11/09/2017 09:42:58 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment: Lack of serious and thorough investigations carried after the applicant had lodged a criminal complaint alleging rape and indecent assault. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47595
B.W.M.Z. v. Netherlands
B.W.M.Z. v. Netherlands CCPR/C/107/D/1788/2008 Communication number s : 1788/2008 Author: B.W.M.Z. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 107 Country Netherlands Submission date 26 Jun 2007 Date of decision 25 Mar 2013 Comment: Pursuant to JUTBCCPR/C/107/D/1788/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1331/en-US
BAHRAIN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
BAHRAIN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CCPR/C/BHR/CO/1 NULL 2018 11 15T00:00:00 CCPR United Nations CCPR/C/BHR/CO/1 International Covenant on Distr.: General 15 November 2018 Civil and Political Rights Original: English Human Rights Committee Concluding UHRICCPR/C/BHR/CO/1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/ef2bcb58-bc2d-4a70-8a0f-59a393dcf797
BAJIC v. North Macedonia
BAJIC v. North Macedonia MKD 10/09/2021 00:00:00 23/09/2021 15:54:44 Case Description: This case concerns a violation of the applicant s right to a fair trial due to the failure of the Supreme Court to communicate to the applicant the public prosecutor s EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58423
BAK v. Poland
BAK v. Poland POL 16/04/2007 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: The cases of Bak and Majewski concern the excessive length of criminal and civil proceedings respectively violations of Article 6 1 . They also concern certain problems in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20594