Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 61 - 80 of 8018
Additional Protocol to the European Agreement on the Transmission of Applications for Legal Aid (ETS No. 179)
Additional Protocol to the European Agreement on the Transmission of Applications for Legal Aid ETS No. 179 179 Moscow 2001 10 04T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the member States signatories to Treaty ETS 92 Moscow 2002 09 01T00:00:00 2 COEETS No. 179https://rm.coe.int/1680080624
Aemei v. Switzerland
Aemei v. Switzerland CAT/C/18/D/34/1995 Communication number s : 034/1995 Author: Seid Mortesa Aemei Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 18 Country Switzerland Submission date 26 Oct 1995 Date of decision 09 May 1997 Comment: This document has JUTBCAT/C/18/D/34/1995https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/256/en-US
Agreement on the Temporary Importation, free of duty, of Medical, Surgical and Laboratory Equipment for use on free loan in Hospitals and other Medical Institutions for purposes of Diagnosis or Treatment (ETS No. 033)
Agreement on the Temporary Importation free of duty of Medical Surgical and Laboratory Equipment for use on free loan in Hospitals and other Medical Institutions for purposes of Diagnosis or Treatment ETS No. 033 033 Strasbourg 1960 04 28T00:00:00 Treaty COEETS No. 033https://rm.coe.int/16800656d1
Alakuş v. Türkiye
Alaku v. T rkiye CCPR/C/135/D/3736/2020 Communication number s : 3736/2020 Author: Mukadder Alaku Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 135 Country T rkiye Submission date 23 Dec 2019 Date of decision 26 Jul 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/135/D/3736/2020https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3737/en-US
Alekseev v. Russian Federation
Alekseev v. Russian Federation CCPR/C/130/D/2757/2016 Communication number s : 2757/2016 Author: Nikolai Alekseev Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 130 Country Russian Federation Submission date 10 Feb 2016 Date of decision 05 Nov 2020 JUTBCCPR/C/130/D/2757/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3273/en-US
Alonzo et al. v. Philippines
Alonzo et al. v. Philippines CEDAW/C/84/D/155/2020 Communication number s : 155/2020 Author: Natalia M. Alonzo Perla B. Balingit Virginia M. Bangit Francia A. Buco Dela Paz B. Culala Belen Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 84 Country JUTBCEDAW/C/84/D/155/2020https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3765/en-US
Angela González Carreño v. Spain
Angela Gonz lez Carre o v. Spain CEDAW/C/58/D/47/2012 Communication number s : 047/2012 Author: Angela Gonz lez Carre o Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 58 Country Spain Submission date 19 Sep 2012 Date of decision 16 Jul 2014 Comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/58/D/47/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1878/en-US
Anna Belousova v. Kazakhstan
Anna Belousova v. Kazakhstan CEDAW/C/61/D/45/2012 Communication number s : 045/2012 Author: Anna Belousova Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 61 Country Kazakhstan Submission date 12 Sep 2012 Date of decision 13 Jul 2015 Comment: This JUTBCEDAW/C/61/D/45/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2053/en-US
Annadurdy Khadzhiyev v. Turkmenistan
Annadurdy Khadzhiyev v. Turkmenistan CCPR/C/122/D/2252/2013 Communication number s : 2252/2013 Author: Annadurdy Khadzhiyev Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 122 Country Turkmenistan Submission date 09 Apr 2013 Date of decision 06 Apr 2018 JUTBCCPR/C/122/D/2252/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2480/en-US
Anti-Doping Convention (ETS No. 135)
Anti Doping Convention ETS No. 135 135 Strasbourg 1989 11 16T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the member States the other States Parties to the European Cultural Convention the non member States which have participated in its elaboration and for COEETS No. 135https://rm.coe.int/168007b0e0
B.B. v. Sweden
B.B. v. Sweden CCPR/C/131/D/3069/2017 Communication number s : 3069/2017 Author: B.B. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 131 Country Sweden Submission date 11 Dec 2017 Date of decision 16 Mar 2021 Comment: Joint opinion of Committee members JUTBCCPR/C/131/D/3069/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3248/en-US
B.K. v. Switzerland
B.K. v. Switzerland CAT/C/67/D/828/2017 Communication number s : 828/2017 Author: B.K. represented by counsel Ange Sankieme Lusanga Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 67 Country Switzerland Submission date 05 Jun 2017 Date of decision JUTBCAT/C/67/D/828/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2679/en-US
B. M. v. Switzerland
B. M. v. Switzerland CEDAW/C/83/D/132/2018 Communication number s : 132/2018 Author: B. M. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 83 Country Switzerland Submission date 09 Aug 2018 Date of decision 17 Oct 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCEDAW/C/83/D/132/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3557/en-US
BAHRAIN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
BAHRAIN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CCPR/C/BHR/CO/1 NULL 2018 11 15T00:00:00 CCPR United Nations CCPR/C/BHR/CO/1 International Covenant on Distr.: General 15 November 2018 Civil and Political Rights Original: English Human Rights Committee Concluding UHRICCPR/C/BHR/CO/1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/ef2bcb58-bc2d-4a70-8a0f-59a393dcf797
BAK v. Poland
BAK v. Poland POL 16/04/2007 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: The cases of Bak and Majewski concern the excessive length of criminal and civil proceedings respectively violations of Article 6 1 . They also concern certain problems in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20594
BALAJEVS v. Latvia
BALAJEVS v. Latvia LVA 28/07/2016 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:30:55 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment: Ill treatment of prisoners by escort officers in the premises of the Riga Regional Court in and lack of effective investigations. Article 3 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12668
BALITSKIY v. Ukraine
BALITSKIY v. Ukraine UKR 03/02/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the convictions of the applicants between 2002 and 2011 on the basis of self incriminating statements made in the absence of a lawyer and in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31116
BALSAN v. Romania
BALSAN v. Romania ROU 23/08/2017 00:00:00 15/09/2017 15:07:24 Case Description: This case concerns the failure of the investigating prosecuting and judicial authorities to comply with their positive obligation under Article 3 to protect the applicant from EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47601
BANGLADESH: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
BANGLADESH: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CAT/C/BGD/CO/1 NULL 2019 08 26T00:00:00 CAT United Nations CAT/C/BGD/CO/1 Convention against Torture Distr.: General 26 August 2019 and Other Cruel Inhuman or Degrading Treatment Original: English or Punishment UHRICAT/C/BGD/CO/1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/d1876765-1efb-46ea-9ec1-79ca133076db
BANGLADESH: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
BANGLADESH: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CCPR/C/BGD/CO/1 NULL 2017 04 27T00:00:00 CCPR United Nations CCPR/C/BGD/CO/1 International Covenant on Distr.: General 27 April 2017 Civil and Political Rights Original: English Human Rights Committee Concluding UHRICCPR/C/BGD/CO/1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/9a2678b7-7fac-43a9-a1f9-91fe5bdfa5fe