Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 26
2. International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 2. International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination New York 7 March 1966 Entry into force : 4 January 1969 in accordance with article 19. 1 Registration : 12 UNIV-2https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-2&chapter=4&clang=_en
4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights New York 16 December 1966 Entry into force : 23 March 1976 in accordance with article 49 for all provisions except those of article 41 UNIV-4https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-4&chapter=4&clang=_en
9. Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 9. Convention against Torture and Other Cruel Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment New York 10 December 1984 Entry into force : 26 June 1987 in accordance with article 27 1 . 1 UNIV-9https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-9&chapter=4&clang=_en
A/HRC/47/10: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Nepal
United Nations A/HRC/47/10 General Assembly Distr.: General 30 March 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty seventh session 21 June 9 July 2021 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review UPRA/HRC/47/10https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/ahrc4710-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-nepal
Atasoy and Sarkut v. Türkiye
Atasoy and Sarkut v. T rkiye CCPR/C/104/D/1853 1854/2008 Communication number s : 1853/2008 1854/2008 Author: Cenk Atasoy and Arda Sarkut Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 104 Country T rkiye Submission date 08 Dec 2008 Date of decision 29 JUTBCCPR/C/104/D/1853-1854/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1627/en-US
Cáceres et al. v. Paraguay
C ceres et al. v. Paraguay CCPR/C/126/D/2751/2016 Communication number s : 2751/2016 Author: Norma Portillo C ceres on her own behalf and that of her deceased brother Rub n Portillo C ceres Hermenegilda C ceres Isabel Bord n Ram rez on her own behalf and JUTBCCPR/C/126/D/2751/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2784/en-US
CASE OF AL-DULIMI AND MONTANA MANAGEMENT INC. v. SWITZERLAND
CASE OF AL DULIMI AND MONTANA MANAGEMENT INC. v. SWITZERLAND 5809/08 MICHEL J. C. OBEIDAT T. FRIES S. CHE 6/21/2016 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Ratione personae Preliminary objection dismissed ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0621JUD000580908https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-164515
CASE OF ÖCALAN v. TURKEY (No. 2) [Extracts]
CASE OF CALAN v. TURKEY No. 2 Extracts 24069/03 197/04 6201/06 10464/07 OTTY T. MULLER M. TUGLUK A. ERBAS D. DUNDAR I. KAPLAN H. TEPE M. KOSTAK F. AYDINKAYA F. GUNES O. BILMEZ I. KAYA B. TUR S. EMEKCI E. BILGIC K. KORKUT H. SAKAR M. YALCINDAG R. BULGAN N. ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0318JUD002406903https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-142087
CASE OF FABRIS v. FRANCE
CASE OF FABRIS v. FRANCE 16574/08 OTTAN A. FRA 2/7/2013 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 14 P1 1 Prohibition of discrimination Article 14 Discrimination Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 Peaceful enjoyment of possessions Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0207JUD001657408https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-116716
CASE OF GARIB v. THE NETHERLANDS
CASE OF GARIB v. THE NETHERLANDS 43494/09 WIJLING R.S. NLD 11/6/2017 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 2 of Protocol No. 4 Freedom of movement general Article 2 para. 1 of Protocol No. 4 Freedom to choose residence Sections 5 2 6 2 7 1 b and 17 of the ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1106JUD004349409https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-177406
CASE OF HRVATSKI LIJEČNIČKI SINDIKAT v. CROATIA
CASE OF HRVATSKI LIJE NI KI SINDIKAT v. CROATIA 36701/09 POSAVEC S. HRV 11/27/2014 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Article 34 Locus standi Violation of Article 11 Freedom of assembly and association Article 11 1 Freedom of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1127JUD003670109https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-148181
CASE OF JONES AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF JONES AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 34356/06 40528/06 CUKIER G. ALLEN T. GBR 1/14/2014 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 6 Right to a fair trial Article 6 Criminal proceedings Article 6 1 Access to court No violation of Article 6 Right to a ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0114JUD003435606https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-140005
CASE OF KONSTANTIN MARKIN v. RUSSIA
CASE OF KONSTANTIN MARKIN v. RUSSIA 30078/06 MOSKALENKO K. LISMAN N GERASIMOVA I. RUS 3/22/2012 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 34 Victim Preliminary objection dismissed Article 37 1 b Matter resolved Remainder inadmissible Violation ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0322JUD003007806https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-109868
CASE OF LOPES DE SOUSA FERNANDES v. PORTUGAL
CASE OF LOPES DE SOUSA FERNANDES v. PORTUGAL 56080/13 S FERNANDES R. PRT 12/19/2017 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Manifestly ill founded No violation of Article 2 Right to life ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1219JUD005608013https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-179556
CASE OF MURTAZALIYEVA v. RUSSIA
CASE OF MURTAZALIYEVA v. RUSSIA 36658/05 KOROTEYEV K.N. RUS 12/18/2018 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection allowed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Manifestly ill founded Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Manifestly ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1218JUD003665805https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-187932
CASE OF NAÏT-LIMAN v. SWITZERLAND
CASE OF NA T LIMAN v. SWITZERLAND 51357/07 TRIAL INTERNATIONAL CHE 3/15/2018 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 6 Right to a fair trial Article 6 Civil proceedings Article 6 1 Access to court Article 41 of the Swiss Code of Obligations Section 3 of the ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0315JUD005135707https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-181789
CASE OF NAIT-LIMAN v. SWITZERLAND
CASE OF NAIT LIMAN v. SWITZERLAND 51357/07 MEMBREZ F. CHE 6/21/2016 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 6 Right to a fair trial Article 6 Civil proceedings Article 6 1 Access to court 445 40 7 354 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0621JUD005135707 SECOND SECTION CASE OF ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0621JUD005135707https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-164470
Convention on Cybercrime (ETS No. 185)
Convention on Cybercrime ETS No. 185 185 Budapest 2001 11 23T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the member States and the non member States which have participated in its elaboration and for accession by other non member States Budapest 2004 07 COEETS No. 185https://rm.coe.int/1680081561
Convention on Mutual Administrative Assistance in Tax Matters (ETS No. 127)
Convention on Mutual Administrative Assistance in Tax Matters ETS No. 127 127 Strasbourg 1988 01 25T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the member States of the Council of Europe and the Member countries of OECD and in its version amended by the 2010 COEETS No. 127https://rm.coe.int/16806a42b0
Durić v. Bosnia and Herzegovina
Duri v. Bosnia and Herzegovina CCPR/C/111/D/1956/2010 Communication number s : 1956/2010 Author: Nevzeta Duri and Nedzad Duri represented Track Impunity Always TRIAL Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 111 Country Bosnia and Herzegovina JUTBCCPR/C/111/D/1956/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1848/en-US