Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 3681 - 3700 of 4327
Rocha Chorlango v. Sweden
Rocha Chorlango v. Sweden CAT/C/33/D/218/2002 Communication number s : 218/2002 Author: Luis Jacinto Rocha Chorlango Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 33 Country Sweden Submission date 16 Sep 2002 Date of decision 22 Nov 2004 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/33/D/218/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/146/en-US
Romero v. Uruguay
Romero v. Uruguay CCPR/C/21/D/85/1981 Communication number s : 085/1981 Author: Nelly Roverano de Romero alleged victim s wife Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 21 Country Uruguay Submission date 02 Mar 1981 Date of decision 29 Mar 1984 JUTBCCPR/C/21/D/85/1981https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/451/en-US
Rouse v. Philippines
Rouse v. Philippines CCPR/C/84/D/1089/2002 Communication number s : 1089/2002 Author: Leon R. Rouse Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 84 Country Philippines Submission date 10 Jun 2002 Date of decision 25 Jul 2005 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/84/D/1089/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1177/en-US
Roy Manojkumar Samathanam v. Sri Lanka
Roy Manojkumar Samathanam v. Sri Lanka CCPR/C/118/D/2412/2014 Communication number s : 2412/2014 Author: Roy Manojkumar Samathanam Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 118 Country Sri Lanka Submission date 13 Nov 2013 Date of decision 28 Oct JUTBCCPR/C/118/D/2412/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2243/en-US
Ruiz Agudo v. Spain
Ruiz Agudo v. Spain CCPR/C/76/D/864/1999 Communication number s : 864/1999 Author: Alfonso Ruiz Agudo Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 76 Country Spain Submission date 12 Mar 1998 Date of decision 31 Oct 2002 Comment: The author submitted a JUTBCCPR/C/76/D/864/1999https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1033/en-US
S.A.C. v. Monaco
S.A.C. v. Monaco CAT/C/49/D/346/2008 Communication number s : 346/2008 Author: S.A.C. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 49 Country Monaco Submission date 08 Jul 2008 Date of decision 13 Nov 2012 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/49/D/346/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/20/en-US
S.B. v. Cameroon
S.B. v. Cameroon CAT/C/75/D/1034/2020 Communication number s : 1034/2020 Author: S.B. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 75 Country Cameroon Submission date 02 Jul 2020 Date of decision 04 Nov 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/75/D/1034/2020https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3760/en-US
S.F.A. v. Denmark
S.F.A. v. Denmark CEDAW/C/69/D/85/2015 Communication number s : 085/2015 Author: S.F.A. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 69 Country Denmark Submission date Date of decision 26 Feb 2018 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/69/D/85/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2427/en-US
S.F.A. v. Denmark
S.F.A. v. Denmark CEDAW/C/69/D/85/2015 Communication number s : 085/2015 Author: S.F.A. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 69 Country Denmark Submission date 22 Apr 2015 Date of decision 26 Feb 2018 Comment: This document has no JUTBCEDAW/C/69/D/85/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2637/en-US
S.H. v. Australia
S.H. v. Australia CAT/C/65/D/761/2016 Communication number s : 761/2016 Author: S.H. represented by counsel John Sweeney Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 65 Country Australia Submission date 28 Jun 2016 Date of decision 23 Nov 2018 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/65/D/761/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2592/en-US
S.J. v. Republic of Korea
S.J. v. Republic of Korea CCPR/C/127/D/2725/2016 Communication number s : 2725/2016 Author: S.J. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 127 Country Republic of Korea Submission date 20 Oct 2015 Date of decision 07 Nov 2019 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/127/D/2725/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2887/en-US
S.L. v. Sweden
S.L. v. Sweden CAT/C/26/D/150/1999 Communication number s : 150/1999 Author: S.L. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 26 Country Sweden Submission date 05 Nov 1999 Date of decision 11 May 2001 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCAT/C/26/D/150/1999https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/194/en-US
S. P. A. v. Canada
S. P. A. v. Canada CAT/C/37/D/282/2005 Communication number s : 282/2005 Author: S.P.A. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 37 Country Canada Submission date 26 Sep 2005 Date of decision 07 Nov 2006 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/37/D/282/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/107/en-US
S.S. v. Australia
S.S. v. Australia CAT/C/61/D/720/2015 Communication number s : 720/2015 Author: S.S. represented by counsel John Sweeney Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 61 Country Australia Submission date 04 Dec 2015 Date of decision 09 Aug 2017 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/61/D/720/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2278/en-US
S.S. v. Netherlands
S.S. v. Netherlands CAT/C/30/D/191/2001 Communication number s : 191/2001 Author: S.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 30 Country Netherlands Submission date 20 Sep 2001 Date of decision 05 May 2003 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/30/D/191/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/172/en-US
SAINT VINCENT AND THE GRENADINES : CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
SAINT VINCENT AND THE GRENADINES : CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CCPR/C/VCT/CO/2/ADD.1 NULL 2019 05 09T00:00:00 CCPR United Nations CCPR/C/VCT/CO/2/Add.1 International Covenant on Distr.: General 9 May 2019 Civil and Political Rights Original: English Human UHRICCPR/C/VCT/CO/2/ADD.1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/eea9b47b-fdc3-4120-95ce-1ddbf600df74
SAKAR AND OTHERS v. Turkey
SAKAR AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 20/01/2016 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:04:14 Case Description: The case concerns a violation of the applicant s right not to be subjected to inhuman or degrading treatment on account of lack of sufficient personal space in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37294
SAKHNOVSKIY v. Russia
SAKHNOVSKIY v. Russia RUS 02/11/2010 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases mainly concerns violations of the applicants right to a fair trial on account of failures to properly organise criminal proceedings conducted by video EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13759
SALAKHOV AND ISLYAMOVA v. Ukraine
SALAKHOV AND ISLYAMOVA v. Ukraine UKR 14/06/2013 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: This case concerns the lack of adequate medical assistance to the first applicant in pre trial detention found primarily due to the Government s failure to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32272
SAMOILA AND CIONCA v. Romania
SAMOILA AND CIONCA v. Romania ROU 04/06/2008 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Failure to bring arrested applicants promptly before the judge refusal of competent court to review the lawfulness of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-16653