Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 941 - 960 of 6534
CASE OF DANKEVICH v. UKRAINE
CASE OF DANKEVICH v. UKRAINE 40679/98 N/A UKR 4/29/2003 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection rejected non exhaustion Violation of Art. 3 Violation of Art. 8 with regard to initial period No violation of Art. 8 with regard to later period Violation of Art. 13 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0429JUD004067998https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-61062
CASE OF DANOV v. BULGARIA
CASE OF DANOV v. BULGARIA 56796/00 LOULTCHEVA I. BGR 10/26/2006 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections dismissed non exhaustion of domestic remedies six month period Violations of Art. 5 3 Violation of Art. 5 4 Remainder inadmissible Non pecuniary damage ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1026JUD005679600https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-77690
CASE OF DARAIBOU v. CROATIA
CASE OF DARAIBOU v. CROATIA 84523/17 HORVAT L. HRV 1/17/2023 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Article 2 Right to life Article 2 Positive ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0117JUD008452317https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-222311
CASE OF DARBOE AND CAMARA v. ITALY
CASE OF DARBOE AND CAMARA v. ITALY 5797/17 FERRERO M. CHIARETTO E. ITA 7/21/2022 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 37 Striking out applications general Art. 37 1 Striking out applications Art. 37 1 c Continued examination not justified Violation of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0721JUD000579717https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-218424
CASE OF DAVID v. MOLDOVA
CASE OF DAVID v. MOLDOVA 41578/05 POSTICA A. MDA 11/27/2007 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 5 1 Not necessary to examine Art. 5 4 Non pecuniary damage financial award Articles 302 and 305 of the Code of Civil Procedure Sections 11 28 32 and 39 of the Law on ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1127JUD004157805https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-83466
CASE OF DAVIES v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF DAVIES v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 42007/98 GBR 7/16/2002 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 1 Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Non pecuniary damage financial award Costs and expenses partial award Convention proceedings 445 406 13 216 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0716JUD004200798https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-60613
CASE OF DAVITIDZE v. RUSSIA
CASE OF DAVITIDZE v. RUSSIA 8810/05 YABLOKOV A. RUS 5/30/2013 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Inhuman treatment Substantive aspect Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Effective investigation ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0530JUD000881005https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-119971
CASE OF DAVTYAN v. ARMENIA
CASE OF DAVTYAN v. ARMENIA 29736/06 SAHAKYAN L. GHAZARYAN A. ARM 3/31/2015 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Degrading treatment Inhuman treatment Substantive aspect 350 90 193 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0331JUD002973606 THIRD ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0331JUD002973606https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-153350
CASE OF DAVYDOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
CASE OF DAVYDOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA 75947/11 MOSKALENKO K. NAPARA Ye. RUS 5/30/2017 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 3 a Abuse of the ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0530JUD007594711https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-173805
CASE OF DAVYDOV AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE
CASE OF DAVYDOV AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE 17674/02 39081/02 ZHERDEV G. BUSHCHENKO A. UKR 7/1/2010 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 37 Striking out applications general Art. 37 1 Striking out applications Struck out of the list Art. 37 Striking ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0701JUD001767402https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-99750
CASE OF DE CUBBER v. BELGIUM
CASE OF DE CUBBER v. BELGIUM 9186/80 N/A BEL 10/26/1984 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 1 Just satisfaction reserved 445 136 180 70 ECLI:CE:ECHR:1984:1026JUD000918680 COURT CHAMBER CASE OF DE CUBBER v. BELGIUM Application no. 9186/80 JUDGMENT STRASBOURG ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1984:1026JUD000918680https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57465
CASE OF DE HAES AND GIJSELS v. BELGIUM
CASE OF DE HAES AND GIJSELS v. BELGIUM 19983/92 N/A BEL 2/24/1997 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 10 Violation of Art. 6 1 Pecuniary damage financial award Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses award domestic proceedings ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0224JUD001998392https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58015
CASE OF DE JONG, BALJET AND VAN DEN BRINK v. THE NETHERLANDS
CASE OF DE JONG BALJET AND VAN DEN BRINK v. THE NETHERLANDS 8805/79 8806/79 9242/81 N/A NLD 5/22/1984 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection rejected non exhaustion of domestic remedies Preliminary objection rejected victim Violation of Art. 5 3 Violation of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1984:0522JUD000880579https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57466
CASE OF DE LEGÉ v. THE NETHERLANDS
CASE OF DE LEG v. THE NETHERLANDS 58342/15 HENDRIKS M. NLD 10/4/2022 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 b No significant disadvantage Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1004JUD005834215https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-219556
CASE OF DE SOUZA RIBEIRO v. FRANCE
CASE OF DE SOUZA RIBEIRO v. FRANCE 22689/07 MONGET SARRAIL D. FRA 12/13/2012 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Article 34 Victim Violation of Article 13 8 Right to an effective remedy Article 13 Effective remedy Article 8 2 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1213JUD002268907https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-115498
CASE OF DE WILDE, OOMS AND VERSYP v. BELGIUM (ARTICLE 50)
CASE OF DE WILDE OOMS AND VERSYP v. BELGIUM ARTICLE 50 2832/66 2835/66 2899/66 N/A BEL 3/10/1972 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection rejected non exhaustion of domestic remedies Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Non pecuniary damage finding of violation ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1972:0310JUD000283266https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57607
CASE OF DEBLED v. BELGIUM
CASE OF DEBLED v. BELGIUM 13839/88 N/A BEL 9/22/1994 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 6 1 Royal Decree no. 79 of 10 November 1967 relating to the Ordre des m decins Articles 12 and 25 para. 4 al. 2 Act of 31 March 1967 Royal Decree of 6 February 1970 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0922JUD001383988https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57888
CASE OF DEDOVSKIY AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
CASE OF DEDOVSKIY AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA 7178/03 ZHULANOV Z. RUS 5/15/2008 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Effective investigation Procedural aspect Violation of Article 13 3 Right to an effective remedy Article 13 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0515JUD000717803https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-86218
CASE OF DEJNEK v. POLAND
CASE OF DEJNEK v. POLAND 9635/13 ROWINSKI T. POL 6/1/2017 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Degrading treatment Substantive aspect Violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 1 Respect ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0601JUD000963513https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-173779
CASE OF DELCOURT v. BELGIUM
CASE OF DELCOURT v. BELGIUM 2689/65 N/A BEL 1/17/1970 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 6 1 445 136 119 70 388 180 181 ECLI:CE:ECHR:1970:0117JUD000268965 COURT CHAMBER CASE OF DELCOURT v. BELGIUM Application no. 2689/65 JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 17 January 1970 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1970:0117JUD000268965https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57467