Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 321 - 340 of 10030
Brandsma v. Netherlands
Brandsma v. Netherlands CCPR/C/80/D/977/2001 Communication number s : 977/2001 Author: R.P.C.W.M. Brandsma Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 80 Country Netherlands Submission date 30 Oct 2000 Date of decision 01 Apr 2004 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/80/D/977/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/376/en-US
Broeks v. Netherlands
Broeks v. Netherlands CCPR/C/29/D/172/1984 Communication number s : 172/1984 Author: S.W.M. Broeks represented by Marie Emmie Diepstraten Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 29 Country Netherlands Submission date 01 Jun 1984 Date of decision JUTBCCPR/C/29/D/172/1984https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/653/en-US
Brok and Brokova v. Czech Republic
Brok and Brokova v. Czech Republic CCPR/C/73/D/774/1997 Communication number s : 774/1997 Author: Robert Brok deceased and his surviving spouse Dagmar Brokova Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 73 Country Czech Republic Submission date 23 Dec JUTBCCPR/C/73/D/774/1997https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/947/en-US
Bronson Blessington and Matthew Elliot v. Australia
Bronson Blessington and Matthew Elliot v. Australia CCPR/C/112/D/1968/2010 Communication number s : 1968/2010 Author: Bronson Blessington and Matthew Elliot represented by Human Rights Law Centre Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 112 Country JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/1968/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1890/en-US
Brun v. France
Brun v. France CCPR/C/88/D/1453/2006 Communication number s : 1453/2006 Author: Andr Brun Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 88 Country France Submission date 15 Nov 2005 Date of decision 18 Oct 2006 Comment: Pursuant to rule 90 of the JUTBCCPR/C/88/D/1453/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1319/en-US
Butovenko v. Ukraine
Butovenko v. Ukraine CCPR/C/102/D/1412/2005 Communication number s : 1412/2005 Author: Aleksandr Butovenko Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 102 Country Ukraine Submission date 28 Mar 2005 Date of decision 19 Jul 2011 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/102/D/1412/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1207/en-US
C.A.R. S.R.L. v. Italy
C.A.R. S.R.L. v. Italy ITA 17/01/1998 00:00:00 28/11/2016 11:43:17 Case Description: Protection of property and effective remedy: Refusal to provide police assistance to evict a group of persons occupying illegally the applicant company s property despite EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-45156
C.A. ZRT. AND T.R. v. Hungary
C.A. ZRT. AND T.R. v. Hungary HUN 01/09/2020 00:00:00 09/09/2020 09:40:56 Case Description: The case concerns the violation of the applicants property rights due to the enactment of a law in 2014 which terminated ipso iure their usufruct rights over EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55847
C.C.M.C. v. Romania
C.C.M.C. v. Romania ROU 28/01/1999 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of proceedings before administrative and judicial authorities in particular length of proceedings to obtain EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-16007
C.M.F. v. Italy
C.M.F. v. Italy ITA 18/07/2002 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:46:44 Case Description: Protection of property: Prolonged lack of enforcement of judicial orders for eviction of tenants. Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-43047
C. SRL v. Italy
C. SRL v. Italy ITA 07/11/2002 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:46:44 Case Description: Protection of property: Prolonged lack of enforcement of judicial orders for eviction of tenants. Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-42611
Cáceres et al. v. Paraguay
C ceres et al. v. Paraguay CCPR/C/126/D/2751/2016 Communication number s : 2751/2016 Author: Norma Portillo C ceres on her own behalf and that of her deceased brother Rub n Portillo C ceres Hermenegilda C ceres Isabel Bord n Ram rez on her own behalf and JUTBCCPR/C/126/D/2751/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2784/en-US
C. v. Australia
C. v. Australia CCPR/C/76/D/900/1999 Communication number s : 900/1999 Author: C. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 76 Country Australia Submission date 23 Nov 1999 Date of decision 28 Oct 2002 Comment: Under rule 85 of the Committee s rules JUTBCCPR/C/76/D/900/1999https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1026/en-US
C v. Australia
C v. Australia CCPR/C/119/D/2216/2012 Communication number s : 2216/2012 Author: C Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 119 Country Australia Submission date 27 Apr 2012 Date of decision 28 Mar 2017 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/119/D/2216/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2375/en-US
CABO VERDE: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
CABO VERDE: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CMW/C/CPV/CO/1 3 NULL 2022 06 01T00:00:00 CMW United Nations CMW/C/CPV/CO/1 3 International Convention on the Distr.: General 2 June 2022 Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Original: English Members of UHRICMW/C/CPV/CO/1-3https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/f71f2e34-3d43-4420-81cf-983436826d94
CAIRNEY v. the United Kingdom
CAIRNEY v. the United Kingdom GBR 20/11/2007 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Discrimination and protection of property: Discriminatory entitlement of widowers to social benefits. Article 8 14 and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 Status of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3033
CAKAREVIC v. Croatia
CAKAREVIC v. Croatia HRV 26/07/2018 00:00:00 19/10/2018 11:50:30 Case Description: Protection of property rights: Excessive burden on the applicants due to certain requirements of reimbursement including statutory interest payments imposed on them in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50581
CALIN v. Romania
CALIN v. Romania ROU 05/07/2022 00:00:00 21/07/2022 09:43:28 Case Description: In C lin the police seized in April 2003 the applicant s apartment cars property documents and money in the context of a criminal investigation against him for unlawfully EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-60779
CALLI v. Turkey
CALLI v. Turkey TUR 12/12/2002 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:10:46 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to the administration s delay in paying additional compensation awarded by the domestic courts for the expropriation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28553
CALVAGNO v. Italy
CALVAGNO v. Italy ITA 03/10/2002 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:46:44 Case Description: Protection of property: Prolonged lack of enforcement of judicial orders for eviction of tenants. Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-43486