Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 4781 - 4800 of 5789
J.I. v. France
J.I. v. France CCPR/C/117/D/2154/2012 Communication number s : 2154/2012 Author: J.I. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 117 Country France Submission date 30 Apr 2012 Date of decision 04 Jul 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/117/D/2154/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2230/en-US
J. S. v. New Zealand
J. S. v. New Zealand CCPR/C/104/D/1752/2008 Communication number s : 1752/2008 Author: J. S. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 104 Country New Zealand Submission date 03 Oct 2007 Date of decision 26 Mar 2012 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/104/D/1752/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1316/en-US
Jérémie Ebénézer Ngapna et al. v. Cameroon
J r mie Eb n zer Ngapna et al. v. Cameroon CCPR/C/126/D/2035/2011 Communication number s : 2035/2011 Author: J r mie Eb n zer Ngapna et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 126 Country Cameroon Submission date 20 Sep 2010 Date of decision JUTBCCPR/C/126/D/2035/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2785/en-US
JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES OF MOSCOW AND OTHERS v. Russia
JEHOVAH S WITNESSES OF MOSCOW AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 22/11/2010 00:00:00 07/11/2016 09:53:14 Case Description: This group of cases Taganrog LRO concerns violation of various rights of the Jehovah s Witnesses. The case of Taganrog LRO concerns violation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-22998
Jacobs v. Belgium
Jacobs v. Belgium CCPR/C/81/D/943/2000 Communication number s : 943/2000 Author: Guido Jacobs Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 81 Country Belgium Submission date 15 Mar 2000 Date of decision 07 Jul 2004 Comment: Individual opinion of JUTBCCPR/C/81/D/943/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1120/en-US
Jensen v. Denmark
Jensen v. Denmark CAT/C/32/D/202/2002 Communication number s : 202/2002 Author: Helle Jensen Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 32 Country Denmark Submission date 15 Jan 2002 Date of decision 05 May 2004 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/32/D/202/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/150/en-US
John Alfred Vogel v. New Zealand
John Alfred Vogel v. New Zealand CAT/C/62/D/672/2015 Communication number s : 672/2015 Author: John Alfred Vogel represented by counsel Tony Ellis Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 62 Country New Zealand Submission date 05 Jan 2015 Date of JUTBCAT/C/62/D/672/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2404/en-US
Jonassen et al. v. Norway
Jonassen et al. v. Norway CCPR/C/76/D/942/2000 Communication number s : 942/2000 Author: Jarle Jonassen and members of the Riast/Hylling reindeer herding district Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 76 Country Norway Submission date 09 JUTBCCPR/C/76/D/942/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1017/en-US
Jong-Cheol v. Republic of Korea
Jong Cheol v. Republic of Korea CCPR/C/84/D/968/2001 Communication number s : 968/2001 Author: Kim Jong Cheol Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 84 Country Republic of Korea Submission date 31 Jan 2000 Date of decision 27 Jul 2005 Comment: An JUTBCCPR/C/84/D/968/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1190/en-US
Jose Henry Monge Contreras v. Canada
Jose Henry Monge Contreras v. Canada CCPR/C/119/D/2613/2015 Communication number s : 2613/2015 Author: Jose Henry Monge Contreras Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 119 Country Canada Submission date 29 May 2015 Date of decision 27 Mar 2017 JUTBCCPR/C/119/D/2613/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2292/en-US
K.C. v. Canada
K.C. v. Canada CCPR/C/45/D/486/1992 Communication number s : 486/1992 Author: K.C. name deleted Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 45 Country Canada Submission date 24 Feb 1992 Date of decision 29 Jul 1992 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/45/D/486/1992https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/589/en-US
K.J. v. Lithuania
K.J. v. Lithuania CCPR/C/130/D/2674/2015 Communication number s : 2674/2015 Author: K.J. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 130 Country Lithuania Submission date 05 Feb 2015 Date of decision 19 Oct 2020 Comment: Individual opinion of JUTBCCPR/C/130/D/2674/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3296/en-US
K.K. and R.H. v. Belgium
K.K. and R.H. v. Belgium CRC/C/89/D/73/2019 Communication number s : 73/2019 Author: K.K. and R.H. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 89 Country Belgium Submission date 30 Jan 2019 Date of decision 04 Feb 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCRC/C/89/D/73/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2995/en-US
K.M. v. Switzerland
K.M. v. Switzerland CAT/C/71/D/865/2018 Communication number s : 865/2018 Author: K.M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 71 Country Switzerland Submission date 31 Jul 2017 Date of decision 27 Jul 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/71/D/865/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3354/en-US
K.N. v. France
K.N. v. France CAT/C/23/D/93/1997 Communication number s : 093/1997 Author: K.N. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 23 Country France Submission date 15 Aug 1997 Date of decision 18 Nov 1999 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/23/D/93/1997https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/222/en-US
K.S. and N.K. v. New Zealand
K.S. and N.K. v. New Zealand CCPR/C/129/D/2769/2016 Communication number s : 2769/2016 Author: K.S. and N.K. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 129 Country New Zealand Submission date 20 May 2016 Date of decision 24 Jul 2020 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/129/D/2769/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2848/en-US
K.S. v. Poland
K.S. v. Poland CEDAW/C/76/D/128/2018 Communication number s : 128/2018 Author: K.S. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 76 Country Poland Submission date 11 Apr 2017 Date of decision 06 Jul 2020 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/76/D/128/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3034/en-US
K.V. v. Australia
K.V. v. Australia CAT/C/58/D/600/2014 Communication number s : 600/2014 Author: K.V. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 58 Country Australia Submission date 25 Apr 2014 Date of decision 11 Aug 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/58/D/600/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2218/en-US
KAKOULLI v. Turkey
KAKOULLI v. Turkey TUR 22/02/2006 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:04:14 Case Description: The Kakoulli group concerns the killings of two Greek Cypriot men in 1996 due to excessive use of firearms by Turkish or Turkish Cypriot military security forces along the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37260
KARA v. Turkey
KARA v. Turkey TUR 30/09/2009 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:45:20 Case Description: This case concerns an unjustified interference with the freedom of expression of the applicant the president of the Anatolian Solidarity Association for Prisoners Families in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37164