Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 4961 - 4980 of 5789
Pestaño v. Philippines
Pesta o v. Philippines CCPR/C/98/D/1619/2007 Communication number s : 1619/2007 Author: Felipe and Evelyn Pesta o Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 98 Country Philippines Submission date 24 Apr 2007 Date of decision 23 Mar 2010 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/98/D/1619/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1564/en-US
Pham v. Canada
Pham v. Canada CCPR/C/93/D/1534/2006 Communication number s : 1534/2006 Author: The Trinh Pham Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 93 Country Canada Submission date 18 Jul 2006 Date of decision 22 Jul 2008 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/93/D/1534/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1009/en-US
Pillai et al. v. Canada
Pillai et al. v. Canada CCPR/C/101/D/1763/2008 Communication number s : 1763/2008 Author: Ernest Sigman Pillai and Laeticia Swenthi Joachimpillai Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 101 Country Canada Submission date 29 Feb 2008 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/101/D/1763/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1631/en-US
Polacková and Polacek v. Czech Republic
Polackov and Polacek v. Czech Republic CCPR/C/90/D/1445/2006 Communication number s : 1445/2006 Author: Libuse Polackov and Joseph Polacek Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 90 Country Czech Republic Submission date 20 Dec 2005 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/90/D/1445/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1388/en-US
Postnov v. Belarus
Postnov v. Belarus CCPR/C/132/D/2361/2014 Communication number s : 2361/2014 Author: Igor Postnov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 132 Country Belarus Submission date 22 Feb 2014 Date of decision 19 Jul 2021 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/132/D/2361/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3108/en-US
Preventing corruption and promoting integrity in central governments (top executive functions) and law enforcement agencies, EVALUATION REPORT, NORTH MACEDONIA
Preventing corruption and promoting integrity in central governments top executive functions and law enforcement agencies EVALUATION REPORT NORTH MACEDONIA MKD 2019 03 22 2019 06 27 Adoption: 22 March 2019 Publication: 27 June 2019 Public GrecoEval5Rep GRECOGrecoEval5Rep(2018)7-Final-eng-NorthMacedonia-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoEval5Rep(2018)7-Final-eng-NorthMacedonia-PUBLIC
Protocol amending the Convention on Mutual Administrative Assistance in Tax Matters (CETS No. 208)
Protocol amending the Convention on Mutual Administrative Assistance in Tax Matters CETS No. 208 208 Paris 2010 05 27T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the Signatories to Treaty ETS 127 Paris 2011 06 01T00:00:00 Ratification by 5 States Parties to the COECETS No. 208https://rm.coe.int/168008482b
Protocol amending the European Convention on Transfrontier Television (ETS No. 171) (*)
Protocol amending the European Convention on Transfrontier Television ETS No. 171 171 Strasbourg 1998 10 01T00:00:00 Since its entry into force this Protocol forms an integrant part of ETS 132 and is closed to legal acts. Strasbourg 2002 03 01T00:00:00 COEETS No. 171https://rm.coe.int/168007f2cd
Protsko et al v. Belarus
Protsko et al v. Belarus CCPR/C/136/D/2712/2015 CCPR/C/136/D/2897/2016 Communication number s : 2897/2016 2909/2016 2910/2016 2915/2016 2712/2015 Author: Aleksandr Protsko and Eduard Nelyubovich Yury Lyashenko Natalya Shchukina Vladimir Katsora And Type JUTBCCPR/C/136/D/2712/2015, CCPR/C/136/D/2897/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3646/en-US
Public statement on Turkey
Public statement on Turkey TUR fcb fe fed fee fef fel fep feu fmmd ftc 15/12/1992 15/12/1992 CPT/Inf 93 1 Original: English European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment CPT Public statement on Turkey CPTCPT/Inf (93) 1https://hudoc.cpt.coe.int/eng?i=p-tur-1992decl-en
Purna Maya v. Nepal
Purna Maya v. Nepal CCPR/C/119/D/2245/2013 Communication number s : 2245/2013 Author: Purna Maya Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 119 Country Nepal Submission date Date of decision Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive issues: JUTBCCPR/C/119/D/2245/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2238/en-US
Quelch v. Jamaica
Quelch v. Jamaica CCPR/C/46/D/292/1988 Communication number s : 292/1988 Author: Delroy Quelch Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 46 Country Jamaica Submission date 08 Jul 1988 Date of decision 23 Oct 1992 Comment: on 8 July 1988 a rule 86 JUTBCCPR/C/46/D/292/1988https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/302/en-US
Quereshi v. Denmark
Quereshi v. Denmark CERD/C/66/D/33/2003 Communication number s : 033/2003 Author: Kamal Quereshi Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 66 Country Denmark Submission date 11 Dec 2003 Date of decision 09 Mar 2005 Comment: See also Communication JUTBCERD/C/66/D/33/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1739/en-US
R.K. v. Canada
R.K. v. Canada CAT/C/19/D/42/1996 Communication number s : 042/1996 Author: R.K. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 19 Country Canada Submission date 22 Feb 1996 Date of decision 20 Nov 1997 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/19/D/42/1996https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/234/en-US
R.L.M. v. France
R.L.M. v. France CCPR/C/44/D/363/1989 Communication number s : 363/1989 Author: R.L.M. name deleted Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 44 Country France Submission date 11 May 1989 Date of decision 06 Apr 1992 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/44/D/363/1989https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/541/en-US
R.N. v. Finland
R.N. v. Finland CRC/C/85/D/98/2019 Communication number s : 098/2019 Author: R.N. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 85 Online limited session Country Finland Submission date 15 Aug 2019 Date of decision 28 Sep 2020 Comment: This JUTBCRC/C/85/D/98/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2765/en-US
R.T. v. France
R.T. v. France CCPR/C/35/D/262/1987 Communication number s : 262/1987 Author: R.T. name deleted Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 35 Country France Submission date 14 Oct 1987 Date of decision 30 Mar 1989 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/35/D/262/1987https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/720/en-US
Rékasi v. Hungary
R kasi v. Hungary CRPD/C/25/D/44/2017 Communication number s : 44/2017 Author: Magdolna R kasi Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 25 Country Hungary Submission date 27 Jul 2017 Date of decision 06 Sep 2021 Comment: This document has no JUTBCRPD/C/25/D/44/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3064/en-US
RANTSEV v.Cyprus
RANTSEV v.Cyprus CYP 10/05/2010 00:00:00 27/10/2016 10:37:04 Case Description: Prohibition of slavery and forced labour applied to trafficking in human beings: Death in ambiguous circumstances of the applicant s daughter who had travelled from the Russian EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3203
RANTSEV v.Russia
RANTSEV v.Russia RUS 10/05/2010 00:00:00 27/10/2016 10:37:04 Case Description: Prohibition of slavery and forced labour applied to trafficking in human beings: Death in ambiguous circumstances of the applicant s daughter who had travelled from the Russian EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46253