Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 301 - 320 of 20639
B.M.S. v. Sweden
B.M.S. v. Sweden CAT/C/56/D/594/2014 Communication number s : 594/2014 Author: B.M.S. not represented by counsel Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 56 Country Sweden Submission date 09 Feb 2014 Date of decision 25 Nov 2015 Comment: Non JUTBCAT/C/56/D/594/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2079/en-US
B.M. v. Sweden
B.M. v. Sweden CAT/C/28/D/179/2001 Communication number s : 179/2001 Author: B.M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 28 Country Sweden Submission date 23 Mar 2001 Date of decision 30 Apr 2002 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCAT/C/28/D/179/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/183/en-US
B. M. v. Switzerland
B. M. v. Switzerland CEDAW/C/83/D/132/2018 Communication number s : 132/2018 Author: B. M. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 83 Country Switzerland Submission date 09 Aug 2018 Date of decision 17 Oct 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCEDAW/C/83/D/132/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3557/en-US
B.N.T.K. v. Sweden
B.N.T.K. v. Sweden CAT/C/64/D/641/2014 Communication number s : 641/2014 Author: B.N.T.K. represented by counsel Mai Greitz Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 64 Country Sweden Submission date 01 Dec 2014 Date of decision 09 Aug 2018 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/64/D/641/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2456/en-US
B.N. and S.R. v. Burundi
B.N. and S.R. v. Burundi CAT/C/71/D/858/2018 Communication number s : 858/2018 Author: B.N. and S.R. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 71 Country Burundi Submission date 22 Dec 2017 Date of decision 19 Jul 2021 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/71/D/858/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3375/en-US
B.P. and P.B. v. Netherlands
B.P. and P.B. v. Netherlands CCPR/C/128/D/2974/2017 Communication number s : 2974/2017 Author: B.P. and P.B. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 128 Country Netherlands Submission date 15 Oct 2016 Date of decision 13 Mar 2020 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/128/D/2974/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2866/en-US
B.S.S. v. Canada
B.S.S. v. Canada CAT/C/32/D/183/2001 Communication number s : 183/2001 Author: B.S.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 32 Country Canada Submission date 07 Mar 2001 Date of decision 12 May 2004 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/32/D/183/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/149/en-US
B.S. v. Austria
B.S. v. Austria CAT/C/75/D/1118/2022 Communication number s : 1118/2022 Author: B.S. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 75 Country Austria Submission date 08 Dec 2021 Date of decision 04 Nov 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/75/D/1118/2022https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3619/en-US
B.S. v. Spain
B.S. v. Spain ESP 24/10/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 09:41:36 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment and discrimination: Lack of effective investigation into allegations of racially motivated ill treatment inflicted by police agents. Article 3 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5760
Béatrice Marin v. France
B atrice Marin v. France CCPR/C/99/D/1793/2008 Communication number s : 1793/2008 Author: B atrice Marin Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 99 Country France Submission date 05 May 2008 Date of decision 27 Jul 2010 Comment: The texts of JUTBCCPR/C/99/D/1793/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1575/en-US
B.d.B. et al. v. Netherlands
B.d.B. et al. v. Netherlands CCPR/C/35/D/273/1988 Communication number s : 273/1988 Author: B.d.B. G.B. C.J.K. L.P.M.W. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 35 Country Netherlands Submission date 14 Jan 1988 Date of decision 30 Mar 1989 JUTBCCPR/C/35/D/273/1988https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/427/en-US
BABYLONOVA v. Slovakia
BABYLONOVA v. Slovakia SVK 20/09/2006 00:00:00 02/11/2016 13:55:44 Case Description: Protection of private life and home: Disproportionate interference due to legal inability to obtain the cancellation of a former resident s registration in the applicant EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7999
BACKOVIC v. Serbia
BACKOVIC v. Serbia SRB 07/05/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:00:18 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of access to court due to impossibility to seek judicial review of the administrative authorities refusal to register an EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-8925
BAKA v. Hungary
BAKA v. Hungary HUN 23/06/2016 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: The European Court found violations of the Convention on account of the undue and premature termination of the applicants mandates as President Baka case and Vice President Erm EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10859
BALAZS v. Hungary
BALAZS v. Hungary HUN 14/03/2016 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: Group of cases concerning violations of the prohibition of discrimination read in conjunction with the prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment on account of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10593
BALKUNAS v. Lithuania
BALKUNAS v. Lithuania LTU 07/07/2020 00:00:00 21/07/2020 14:49:16 Case Description: This case concerns the disproportionate limitation of the applicant s right of access to a tribunal due to the refusal of the Supreme Court in 2017 to partly exempt him EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55627
BALSAN v. Romania
BALSAN v. Romania ROU 23/08/2017 00:00:00 15/09/2017 15:07:24 Case Description: This case concerns the failure of the investigating prosecuting and judicial authorities to comply with their positive obligation under Article 3 to protect the applicant from EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47601
BALSAN v. the Czech Republic
BALSAN v. the Czech Republic CZE 18/10/2006 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:27:14 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of a fair trial because of the refusal to grant the applicant the right to question or have questioned the co EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6208
BALSYTE-LIDEIKIENE v. Lithuania
BALSYTE LIDEIKIENE v. Lithuania LTU 04/02/2009 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:14:54 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Denial of a fair trial due to the inability in administrative proceedings to question the experts on whose expert EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4213
BALTIC MASTER LTD. v. Lithuania
BALTIC MASTER LTD. v. Lithuania LTU 16/04/2019 00:00:00 25/04/2019 11:23:50 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Unfair administrative proceedings due to the lack of adequate reasoning for a refusal of the domestic courts in 2016 to refer a question EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51955