Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 3921 - 3925 of 3925
Zentralrat Deutscher Sinti und Roma et al. v. Germany
Zentralrat Deutscher Sinti und Roma et al. v. Germany CERD/C/72/D/38/2006 Communication number s : 038/2006 Author: Zentralrat Deutscher Sinti und Roma et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 72 Country Germany Submission date 29 Aug 2006 JUTBCERD/C/72/D/38/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1732/en-US
Zvozskov et al v. Belarus
Zvozskov et al v. Belarus CCPR/C/88/D/1039/2001 Communication number s : 1039/2001 Author: Boris Zvozskov et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 88 Country Belarus Submission date 12 Nov 2001 Date of decision 17 Oct 2006 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/88/D/1039/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1313/en-US
Zwaan-de Vries v. Netherlands
Zwaan de Vries v. Netherlands CCPR/C/29/D/182/1984 Communication number s : 182/1984 Author: F.H. Zwaan de Vries Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 29 Country Netherlands Submission date 28 Sep 1984 Date of decision 09 Apr 1987 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/29/D/182/1984https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/532/en-US
c("Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Cambodia (Cambodia third official country visit )", "Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Cambodia (Cambodia third official country visit )")
c Document/information Follow up Information c A/HRC/36/61 A/HRC/36/61 c c 27 July 2017 27 July 2017 c Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Cambodia Cambodia third official country visit Special Rapporteur on the situation of human UNSPc("A/HRC/36/61", "A/HRC/36/61")https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f36%2f61&Lang=en
v. Denmark
v. Denmark CAT/C/52/D/466/2011 Communication number s : 466/2011 Author: Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 52 Country Denmark Submission date Date of decision Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive issues: No issues found JUTBCAT/C/52/D/466/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1829/en-US