Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 8541 - 8560 of 9085
Strik v. Netherlands
Strik v. Netherlands CCPR/C/76/D/1001/2001 Communication number s : 1001/2001 Author: Jacobus Gerardus Strik Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 76 Country Netherlands Submission date 29 Jun 1999 Date of decision 01 Nov 2002 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/76/D/1001/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1029/en-US
Sudalenko and Poplavny v. Belarus
Sudalenko and Poplavny v. Belarus CCPR/C/132/D/2691/2015 Communication number s : 2691/2015 Author: Leonid Sudalenko and Anatoly Poplavny Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 132 Country Belarus Submission date 06 Apr 2015 Date of decision 23 JUTBCCPR/C/132/D/2691/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3180/en-US
Suleymanova and Israfilova v. Azerbaijan
Suleymanova and Israfilova v. Azerbaijan CCPR/C/133/D/3061/2017 Communication number s : 3061/2017 Author: Jaarey Suleymanova and Gulnaz Israfilova Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 133 Country Azerbaijan Submission date 26 Jul 2017 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/133/D/3061/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3165/en-US
Sultanova v. Uzbekistan
Sultanova v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/86/D/915/2000 Communication number s : 915/2000 Author: Darmon Sultanova Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 86 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 07 Feb 2000 Date of decision 30 Mar 2006 Comment: In accordance JUTBCCPR/C/86/D/915/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1250/en-US
Summary of Stakeholders’ submissions on Liberia Report of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights
United Nations A/HRC/WG.6/36/LBR/3 General Assembly Distr.: General 25 February 2020 Original: English Human Rights Council Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review Thirty sixth session 4 15 May 2020 Summary of Stakeholders submissions on Liberia UPRA/HRC/WG.6/36/LBR/3https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/summary-stakeholders-submissions-liberia-report-office-united-nations
Sunnet Jarrarow v. Turkmenistan
Sunnet Jarrarow v. Turkmenistan CCPR/C/115/D/2223/2012 Communication number s : 2223/2012 Author: Sunnet Jarrarow Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 115 Country Turkmenistan Submission date 03 Sep 2012 Date of decision 29 Oct 2015 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/115/D/2223/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2048/en-US
Supplementary report to the Italian Government on the visit to Italy carried out by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) from 14 to 18 June 2010
Supplementary report to the Italian Government on the visit to Italy carried out by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment CPT from 14 to 18 June 2010 ITA a 2011 04 14 2013 11 19 CPT/Inf 2013 CPTCPT/Inf (2013) 30 [Part 2]https://hudoc.cpt.coe.int/eng?i=p-ita-20100615-en
Surat Huseynov v. Azerbaijan
Surat Huseynov v. Azerbaijan CCPR/C/111/D/2042/2011 Communication number s : 2042/2011 Author: Surat Davud Oglu Huseynov Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 111 Country Azerbaijan Submission date 05 Jul 2010 Date of decision 21 Jul 2014 JUTBCCPR/C/111/D/2042/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1865/en-US
Surgan v. Belarus
Surgan v. Belarus CCPR/C/114/D/1969/2010 Communication number s : 1969/2010 Author: Taras Surgan Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 114 Country Belarus Submission date 28 May 2010 Date of decision 15 Jul 2015 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/114/D/1969/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2011/en-US
Susith Wasitha Ranawaka v. Australia
Susith Wasitha Ranawaka v. Australia CAT/C/68/D/855/2017 Communication number s : 855/2017 Author: Susith Wasitha Ranawaka represented by counsel Michaela Byers Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 68 Country Australia Submission date 20 Nov JUTBCAT/C/68/D/855/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2699/en-US
Sylvie Bakatu-Bia v. Sweden
Sylvie Bakatu Bia v. Sweden CAT/C/46/D/379/2009 Communication number s : 379/2009 Author: Sylvie Bakatu Bia Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 46 Country Sweden Submission date 26 Mar 2009 Date of decision 03 Jun 2011 Comment: This document JUTBCAT/C/46/D/379/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1792/en-US
Szijjarto v. Hungary
Szijjarto v. Hungary CEDAW/C/36/D/4/2004 Communication number s : 004/2004 Author: Andrea Szijjarto Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 36 Country Hungary Submission date 12 Feb 2004 Date of decision 14 Aug 2006 Comment: Under rule 60 1 c of JUTBCEDAW/C/36/D/4/2004https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1716/en-US
T.I. v. Canada,Uzbekistan
T.I. v. Canada Uzbekistan CAT/C/45/D/333/2007 Communication number s : 333/2007 Author: T.I. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 45 Country Canada Uzbekistan Submission date 15 Sep 2007 Date of decision 15 Nov 2010 Comment: This document has JUTBCAT/C/45/D/333/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/62/en-US
T.L.N. v. Norway
T.L.N. v. Norway CCPR/C/111/D/1942/2010 Communication number s : 1942/2010 Author: T.L.N. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 111 Country Norway Submission date 11 Dec 2009 Date of decision 16 Jul 2014 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/111/D/1942/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1847/en-US
T. M. and Z. I v. Uzbekistan
T. M. and Z. I v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/98/D/1206/2003 Communication number s : 1206/2003 Author: T. M. and Z. I Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 98 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 13 Oct 2003 Date of decision 10 Mar 2010 Comment: Under rule JUTBCCPR/C/98/D/1206/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1551/en-US
T. M. v. Republic of Korea
T. M. v. Republic of Korea CAT/C/53/D/519/2012 Communication number s : 519/2012 Author: T. M. represented by counsel Jae Chang Oh Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 53 Country Republic of Korea Submission date 24 Apr 2012 Date of decision 21 JUTBCAT/C/53/D/519/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2059/en-US
T.M. v. Sweden
T.M. v. Sweden CAT/C/68/D/860/2018 Communication number s : 860/2018 Author: T.M. represented by counsel Daniel Carnestedt Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 68 Country Sweden Submission date 21 Jan 2018 Date of decision 06 Dec 2019 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/68/D/860/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2702/en-US
T.N. v. Denmark
T.N. v. Denmark CEDAW/C/59/D/37/2012 Communication number s : 037/2012 Author: T.N. represented by counsel Tyge Trier Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 59 Country Denmark Submission date 19 Sep 2011 Date of decision 03 Nov 2014 JUTBCEDAW/C/59/D/37/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1880/en-US
T.P.F. v. Peru
T.P.F. v. Peru CEDAW/C/50/D/22/2009 Communication number s : 022/2009 Author: T.P.F. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 50 Country Peru Submission date 18 Jun 2009 Date of decision 17 Oct 2011 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/50/D/22/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1704/en-US
T.P.S. v. Canada
T.P.S. v. Canada CAT/C/24/D/99/1997 Communication number s : 099/1997 Author: T.P.S. name withheld Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 24 Country Canada Submission date 19 Nov 1997 Date of decision 16 May 2000 Comment: An individual opinion JUTBCAT/C/24/D/99/1997https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/216/en-US