Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 2521 - 2540 of 3282
David Hicks v. Australia
David Hicks v. Australia CCPR/C/115/D/2005/2010 Communication number s : 2005/2010 Author: David Hicks Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 115 Country Australia Submission date 20 Sep 2010 Date of decision 05 Nov 2015 Comment: Individual JUTBCCPR/C/115/D/2005/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2084/en-US
Dayras et al. v. France
Dayras et al. v. France CEDAW/C/44/D/13/2007 Communication number s : 013/2007 Author: Mich le Dayras Nelly Campo Trumel Sylvie Delange Fr d rique Remy Cremieu Micheline Zeghouani H l ne Muzard Fekkar and Ad le Daufrene Levrard Type of decision: JUTBCEDAW/C/44/D/13/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1712/en-US
De Groot v. Netherlands
De Groot v. Netherlands CCPR/C/54/D/578/1994 Communication number s : 578/1994 Author: Leonardus Johannes Maria de Groot Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 54 Country Netherlands Submission date 23 Apr 1993 Date of decision 14 Jul 1995 JUTBCCPR/C/54/D/578/1994https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/640/en-US
De Vos v. Netherlands
De Vos v. Netherlands CCPR/C/84/D/1192/2003 Communication number s : 1192/2003 Author: M. de Vos Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 84 Country Netherlands Submission date 06 Aug 2002 Date of decision 25 Jul 2005 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/84/D/1192/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/982/en-US
Decision on admissibility and the merits: Swedish Trade Union Confederation (LO) and Swedish Confederation of Professional Employees (TCO) v. Sweden, Complaint No. 85/2012
Decision on admissibility and the merits: Swedish Trade Union Confederation LO and Swedish Confederation of Professional Employees TCO v. Sweden Complaint No. 85/2012 SWE 06 02 000 06 04 000 19 04 000 03/07/2013 05/02/2014 European Committee of Social ESCcc-85-2012-dadmissandmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-85-2012-dadmissandmerits-en
Decision on the Merits: European Federation of National Organisations working with the Homeless (FEANTSA) v. the Netherlands, Collective Complaint No. 86/2012
Decision on the Merits: European Federation of National Organisations working with the Homeless FEANTSA v. the Netherlands Collective Complaint No. 86/2012 NLD 13 00 000 16 00 000 17 00 163 19 00 000 30 00 163 31 00 163 13 01 000 13 04 000 19 04 000 31 02 ESCcc-86-2012-dmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-86-2012-dmerits-en
Decision on the merits: Defence for Children International (DCI ) v. Belgium, Collective Complaint No. 69/2011
Decision on the merits: Defence for Children International DCI v. Belgium Collective Complaint No. 69/2011 BEL 17 01 163 07 10 000 11 00 000 11 01 000 13 00 000 30 00 163 91 00 163 11 02 000 13 01 000 13 02 000 13 03 000 16 00 000 91 140 163 91 154 163 91 ESCcc-69-2011-dmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-69-2011-dmerits-en
Decision on the merits: Defence for Children International (DCI) v. The Netherlands, Collective Complaint No.47/2008
Decision on the merits: Defence for Children International DCI v. The Netherlands Collective Complaint No.47/2008 NLD 11 00 000 13 00 000 16 00 000 17 00 163 30 00 163 31 00 163 91 154 163 91 163 163 91 175 163 91 176 163 91 212 163 91 213 163 20/10/2009 ESCcc-47-2008-dmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-47-2008-dmerits-en
Decision on the merits: European Committee for Home-Based Priority Action for the Child and the Family (EUROCEF) v. France, complaint No. 114/2015
Decision on the merits: European Committee for Home Based Priority Action for the Child and the Family EUROCEF v. France complaint No. 114/2015 FRA 17 01 163 17 02 163 07 10 000 11 01 000 13 01 000 31 02 163 30 00 163 91 00 163 2018 01 24 2018 06 15 ESCcc-114-2015-dmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-114-2015-dmerits-en
Decision on the merits:International Commission of Jurists (ICJ) v. Czech Republic, Complaint No.148/2017
Decision on the merits:International Commission of Jurists ICJ v. Czech Republic Complaint No.148/2017 CZE 17 00 035 2020 10 20 2021 03 17 European Committee of Social Rights Comit europ en des Droits sociaux DECISION ON THE MERITS Adoption: 20 October ESCcc-148-2017-dmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-148-2017-dmerits-en
Decision on the merits: International Federation of Human Rights Leagues (FIDH) v. Greece, Collective Complaint No. 72/2011
Decision on the merits: International Federation of Human Rights Leagues FIDH v. Greece Collective Complaint No. 72/2011 GRC 11 01 000 11 02 000 11 03 000 23/01/2013 05/06/2013 European Committee of Social Rights Comit europ en des Droits sociaux DECISION ESCcc-72-2011-dmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-72-2011-dmerits-en
Decision on the merits: Marangopoulos Foundation for Human Rights (MFHR) v. Greece, Collective Complaint No. 30/2005
Decision on the merits: Marangopoulos Foundation for Human Rights MFHR v. Greece Collective Complaint No. 30/2005 GRC 02 04 163 03 01 163 03 02 000 11 01 000 11 02 000 11 03 000 06/12/2006 07/06/2007 European Committee of Social Rights Comit europ en des ESCcc-30-2005-dmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-30-2005-dmerits-en
Decision on the merits: University Women of Europe (UWE) v. Italy, Complaint No. 133/2016
Decision on the merits: University Women of Europe UWE v. Italy Complaint No. 133/2016 ITA 01 00 000 04 00 000 04 03 000 20 00 000 91 100 163 91 118 163 91 121 163 91 197 163 2019 12 06 2020 06 29 European Committee of Social Rights Comit europ en des ESCcc-133-2016-dmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-133-2016-dmerits-en
Deepan Budlakoti v. Canada
Deepan Budlakoti v. Canada CCPR/C/122/D/2264/2013 Communication number s : 2264/2013 Author: Deepan Budlakoti Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 122 Country Canada Submission date 04 Jul 2013 Date of decision 06 Apr 2018 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/122/D/2264/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2479/en-US
Deisl v. Austria
Deisl v. Austria CCPR/C/81/D/1060/2002 Communication number s : 1060/2002 Author: Franz and Maria Deisl Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 81 Country Austria Submission date 17 Sep 2001 Date of decision 27 Jul 2004 Comment: The authors asked JUTBCCPR/C/81/D/1060/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1128/en-US
Deperraz and Delieutraz v. France
Deperraz and Delieutraz v. France CCPR/C/83/D/1118/2002 Communication number s : 1118/2002 Author: Jean Louis Deperraz and his wife Genevi ve Delieutraz Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 83 Country France Submission date 11 Oct 2000 JUTBCCPR/C/83/D/1118/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1170/en-US
Des Fours Walderode and Kammerlander v. Czech Republic
Des Fours Walderode and Kammerlander v. Czech Republic CCPR/C/73/D/747/1997 Communication number s : 747/1997 Author: Karel Des Fours Walderode and Johanna Kammerlander Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 73 Country Czech Republic Submission JUTBCCPR/C/73/D/747/1997https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/937/en-US
Dias v. Angola
Dias v. Angola CCPR/C/68/D/711/1996 Communication number s : 711/1996 Author: Carlos Dias Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 68 Country Angola Submission date 28 Mar 1996 Date of decision 20 Mar 2000 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/68/D/711/1996https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/889/en-US
Dilnar Insenova v. Kazakhstan
Dilnar Insenova v. Kazakhstan CCPR/C/126/D/2542/2015 Communication number s : 2542/2015 2543/2015 Author: Dilnar Insenova Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 126 Country Kazakhstan Submission date 02 Sep 2014 Date of decision 26 Jul 2019 JUTBCCPR/C/126/D/2542/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2906/en-US
Dimitrov v. Bulgaria
Dimitrov v. Bulgaria CCPR/C/85/D/1030/2001 Communication number s : 1030/2001 Author: Dimitar Atanasov Dimitrov Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 85 Country Bulgaria Submission date 03 Sep 2001 Date of decision 28 Oct 2005 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/85/D/1030/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1176/en-US