Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 161 - 180 of 2484
CASE OF KOCHEROV AND SERGEYEVA v. RUSSIA
CASE OF KOCHEROV AND SERGEYEVA v. RUSSIA 16899/13 BARTENEV D. RUS 3/29/2016 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 1 Respect for family life Non pecuniary damage award Article 41 Non pecuniary damage Just ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0329JUD001689913https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-161760
CASE OF KONONOV v. LATVIA
CASE OF KONONOV v. LATVIA 36376/04 IOFFE M.L. LVA 5/17/2010 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 7 Article 14 and Chapter IX of the 1926 Criminal Code of Soviet Russia Article 68 3 of the 1961 Criminal Code 288 536 291 434 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0517JUD003637604 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0517JUD003637604https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-98669
CASE OF KONSTANTIN MARKIN v. RUSSIA
CASE OF KONSTANTIN MARKIN v. RUSSIA 30078/06 N/A RUS 10/7/2010 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 14 8 Remainder inadmissible Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Respondent State to take measures of a general ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1007JUD003007806https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-100926
CASE OF KONSTANTIN MARKIN v. RUSSIA
CASE OF KONSTANTIN MARKIN v. RUSSIA 30078/06 MOSKALENKO K. LISMAN N GERASIMOVA I. RUS 3/22/2012 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 34 Victim Preliminary objection dismissed Article 37 1 b Matter resolved Remainder inadmissible Violation ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0322JUD003007806https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-109868
CASE OF KUCHERENKO v. UKRAINE
CASE OF KUCHERENKO v. UKRAINE 22600/02 N/A UKR 7/26/2007 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 1 445 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0726JUD002260002 FIFTH SECTION CASE OF KUCHERENKO v. UKRAINE Application no. 22600/02 JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 26 July 2007 FINAL 26/10/2007 This ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0726JUD002260002https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-81938
CASE OF KUOLELIS, BARTOSEVICIUS AND BUROKEVICIUS v. LITHUANIA
CASE OF KUOLELIS BARTOSEVICIUS AND BUROKEVICIUS v. LITHUANIA 74357/01 26764/02 27434/02 SAJAUKAITE E. ZAMALAITIS A. LEKAVICIENE V. R. LTU 2/19/2008 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 6 Right to a fair trial No violation of Article 7 No punishment without ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0219JUD007435701https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-85152
CASE OF KURIĆ AND OTHERS v. SLOVENIA
CASE OF KURI AND OTHERS v. SLOVENIA 26828/06 LANA A.G. BALLERINI A. SACCUCCI A. VANO M. SVN 6/26/2012 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections dismissed Article 35 1 Effective domestic remedy Continuing situation Article 35 3 Ratione materiae Ratione temporis ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0626JUD002682806https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-111634
CASE OF KURT v. TURKEY
CASE OF KURT v. TURKEY 24276/94 N/A TUR 5/25/1998 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection rejected Not necessary to examine Art. 2 Not necessary to examine Art. 3 complaint in respect of applicant s son Violation of Art. 5 Violation of Art. 3 Violation of Art. ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0525JUD002427694https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58198
CASE OF KYRIACOU TSIAKKOURMAS AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
CASE OF KYRIACOU TSIAKKOURMAS AND OTHERS v. TURKEY 13320/02 DR K CHRYSOSTOMIDES AND COMPANY LLC GEORGIADES AND PELIDES LLC TUR 6/2/2015 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Article 35 1 Effective domestic remedy Remainder ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0602JUD001332002https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-155000
CASE OF LÓPEZ RIBALDA AND OTHERS v. SPAIN
CASE OF L PEZ RIBALDA AND OTHERS v. SPAIN 1874/13 8567/13 GONZALES ESPADA J.A. ESP 10/17/2019 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies No violation of Article 8 Right to respect ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1017JUD000187413https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-197098
CASE OF LÓPEZ RIBALDA AND OTHERS v. SPAIN
CASE OF L PEZ RIBALDA AND OTHERS v. SPAIN 1874/13 8567/13 GONZALEZ ESPADA J.A. ESP 1/9/2018 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 Positive ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0109JUD000187413https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-179881
CASE OF LOBO MACHADO v. PORTUGAL
CASE OF LOBO MACHADO v. PORTUGAL 15764/89 N/A PRT 2/20/1996 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 1 adversarial trial Not necessary to examine P1 1 Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses award Convention proceedings Constitution ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0220JUD001576489https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57978
CASE OF LOPES DE SOUSA FERNANDES v. PORTUGAL
CASE OF LOPES DE SOUSA FERNANDES v. PORTUGAL 56080/13 S FERNANDES R. PRT 12/19/2017 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Manifestly ill founded No violation of Article 2 Right to life ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1219JUD005608013https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-179556
CASE OF LYKOUREZOS v. GREECE
CASE OF LYKOUREZOS v. GREECE 33554/03 ALIVIZATOS N. professor Athens KIOUSSOPOULOU E. and MALLIOS E. lawyers Athens GRC 6/15/2006 12:00:00 AM Violation of P1 3 Not necessary to examine Art. 8 Pecuniary damage financial award Costs and expenses partial ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0615JUD003355403https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-75858
CASE OF M.A. v. DENMARK
CASE OF M.A. v. DENMARK 6697/18 DAHLAGER C. DNK 7/9/2021 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 Positive obligations Article 8 1 Respect for family life Non pecuniary damage award Article 41 Non pecuniary ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0709JUD000669718https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-211178
CASE OF M.H. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF M.H. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 11577/06 ELLIOTT BRIDGMAN SOLICITORS GBR 10/22/2013 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 5 Right to liberty and security Article 5 4 Review of lawfulness of detention Take proceedings No violation of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1022JUD001157706https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-127107
CASE OF M.S. v. CROATIA (No. 2)
CASE OF M.S. v. CROATIA No. 2 75450/12 HRV 2/19/2015 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Effective ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0219JUD007545012https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-152259
CASE OF M.Y.H. AND OTHERS v. SWEDEN
CASE OF M.Y.H. AND OTHERS v. SWEDEN 50859/10 BEXELIUS M. SWE 6/27/2013 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Expulsion Conditional Iraq 350 620 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0627JUD005085910 FIFTH SECTION CASE OF M.Y.H. AND OTHERS v. ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0627JUD005085910https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-121567
CASE OF MAKHMUDZHAN ERGASHEV v. RUSSIA
CASE OF MAKHMUDZHAN ERGASHEV v. RUSSIA 49747/11 KORNEVA Ye.V. RUS 10/16/2012 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Extradition Conditional Kyrgyzstan Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Articles 21 62 and 63 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1016JUD004974711https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-113719
CASE OF MALONE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF MALONE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 8691/79 N/A GBR 8/2/1984 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 8 Not necessary to examine Art. 13 Just satisfaction reserved Post Office Act 1969 Section 80 451 429 424 203 319 268 329 333 444 110 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1984:0802JUD000869179https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57533