Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 157
8. Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 8. Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women New York 18 December 1979 1 Entry into force : 3 September 1981 in accordance with article 27 1 . Registration : 3 UNIV-8https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-8&chapter=4&clang=_en
A/HRC/47/10: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Nepal
United Nations A/HRC/47/10 General Assembly Distr.: General 30 March 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty seventh session 21 June 9 July 2021 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review UPRA/HRC/47/10https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/ahrc4710-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-nepal
A/HRC/47/12: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Austria
United Nations A/HRC/47/12 General Assembly Distr.: General 9 April 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty seventh session 21 June 9 July 2021 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review UPRA/HRC/47/12https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/ahrc4712-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-austria
Aboushanif v. Norway
Aboushanif v. Norway CCPR/C/93/D/1542/2007 Communication number s : 1542/2007 Author: Abdeel Keerem Hassan Aboushanif Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 93 Country Norway Submission date 20 Nov 2006 Date of decision 17 Jul 2008 Comment: Two JUTBCCPR/C/93/D/1542/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1436/en-US
Agiza v. Sweden
Agiza v. Sweden CAT/C/34/D/233/2003 Communication number s : 233/2003 Author: Ahmed Hussein Mustafa Kamil Agiza Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 34 Country Sweden Submission date 25 Jun 2003 Date of decision 20 May 2005 Comment: Decision on JUTBCAT/C/34/D/233/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/140/en-US
CASE OF ABU ZUBAYDAH v. LITHUANIA
CASE OF ABU ZUBAYDAH v. LITHUANIA 46454/11 DUFFY H. MICKUM IV G.B. MARGULIES J. LTU 5/31/2018 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 34 Individual applications Art. 34 Victim Preliminary objections joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0531JUD004645411https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-183687
CASE OF AL NASHIRI v. POLAND
CASE OF AL NASHIRI v. POLAND 28761/11 GOLDSTON J.A. SKILBECK R. SINGH A. HOLLANDER N. POL 7/24/2014 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Remainder ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0724JUD002876111https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-146044
CASE OF AL NASHIRI v. ROMANIA
CASE OF AL NASHIRI v. ROMANIA 33234/12 GOLDSTON J.A. SKILBECK R. SINGH A. HOLLANDER N. HATNEANU D.O. ROU 5/31/2018 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0531JUD003323412https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-183685
CASE OF GEORGIA v. RUSSIA (II)
CASE OF GEORGIA v. RUSSIA II 38263/08 RUS 1/21/2021 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Ratione loci ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0121JUD003826308https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-207757
CASE OF HIRSI JAMAA AND OTHERS v. ITALY
CASE OF HIRSI JAMAA AND OTHERS v. ITALY 27765/09 LANA A. G. SACCUCCI A. ITA 2/23/2012 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections joined to merits and dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0223JUD002776509https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-109231
CASE OF HUSAYN (ABU ZUBAYDAH) v. POLAND
CASE OF HUSAYN ABU ZUBAYDAH v. POLAND 7511/13 HUGHES P. DUFFY H. VANDOVA V. MARGULIES J. MICKUM G.B. JANKOWSKI B. POL 7/24/2014 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0724JUD000751113https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-146047
CASE OF ISMOILOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
CASE OF ISMOILOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA 2947/06 SOKOLOVA I. RUS 4/24/2008 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 3 Violation of Art. 5 1 f Violation of Art. 5 4 Violation of Art. 6 2 Non pecuniary damage award Costs and expenses award Article 22 of the Constitution ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0424JUD000294706https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-86086
CASE OF OTHMAN (ABU QATADA) v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF OTHMAN ABU QATADA v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 8139/09 PEIRCE G. FITZGERALD E. QC HUSAIN R. QC FRIEDMAN D. GBR 1/17/2012 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Expulsion Conditional Jordan No violation of Article 3 13 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0117JUD000813909https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-108629
CASE OF SARGSYAN v. AZERBAIJAN
CASE OF SARGSYAN v. AZERBAIJAN 40167/06 GASPARYAN N. OHANYAN K. AZE 6/16/2015 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 3 Continuing situation Preliminary objection ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0616JUD004016706https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-155662
CASE OF VAVŘIČKA AND OTHERS v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
CASE OF VAV I KA AND OTHERS v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC 47621/13 3867/14 73094/14 19298/15 19306/15 43883/15 CANDIGLIOTA Z. CZE 4/8/2021 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0408JUD004762113https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-209039
Council adopts outcome of Universal Periodic Review on the United States, holds general debate on the Universal Periodic Review
Human Rights Council AFTERNOON 18 March 2011 The Human Rights Council this afternoon adopted the outcome of the Universal Periodic Review on the United States and held a general debate on the Universal Periodic Review. Harold Hongju Koh Legal Adviser of UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2011/03/council-adopts-outcome-universal-periodic-review-united-states-holds-general
David Hicks v. Australia
David Hicks v. Australia CCPR/C/115/D/2005/2010 Communication number s : 2005/2010 Author: David Hicks Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 115 Country Australia Submission date 20 Sep 2010 Date of decision 05 Nov 2015 Comment: Individual JUTBCCPR/C/115/D/2005/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2084/en-US
Fourth report on Greece
Fourth report on Greece GRC 2009 04 02 2009 09 15 CRI 2009 31 ECRI REPORT ON GREECE fourth monitoring cycle Adopted on 2 April 2009 Published on 15 September 2009 Foreword Foreword In the framework of its statutory activities ECRI conducts country by ECRIGRC-CbC-IV-2009-031-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=GRC-CbC-IV-2009-031-ENG
Human Rights Council adopts Universal Periodic Review outcomes of Fiji, San Marino, Iran, Angola and Kazakhstan
Human Rights Council 12 March 2020 The Human Rights Council in its midday meeting adopted the Universal Periodic Review outcomes of Fiji San Marino Iran Angola and Kazakhstan. Nazhat Shameem Khan Permanent Representative of Fiji to the United Nations UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2020/03/human-rights-council-adopts-universal-periodic-review-outcomes-fiji-san
Human Rights Council adopts outcome of Universal Periodic Review on the United Kingdom, India and Brazil
Human Rights CouncilMORNING 20 September 2012 The Human Rights Council this morning adopted the outcome of the Universal Periodic Review on the United Kingdom India and Brazil.Karen Pierce Permanent Representative of the United Kingdom to the United UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2012/09/human-rights-council-adopts-outcome-universal-periodic-review-united-kingdom