Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1041 - 1049 of 1049
Working Group on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises
Report to HRC A/HRC/41/43/Add.2 from 2 July 2018 to 11 July 2018 21 May 2019 Working Group on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises Kenya United Nations A/HRC/41/43/Add.2 General Assembly Distr.: General UNSPA/HRC/41/43/Add.2https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f41%2f43%2fAdd.2&Lang=en
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/4/42/Add.2 from 28 August 2006 to 1 September 2006 23 February 2007 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination Ecuador UNITED UNSPA/HRC/4/42/Add.2https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f4%2f42%2fAdd.2&Lang=en
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/33/43/Add.2 from 12 October 2015 to 16 October 2015 8 July 2016 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination Belgium United Nations UNSPA/HRC/33/43/Add.2https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f33%2f43%2fAdd.2&Lang=en
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/45/9/Add.1 from 13 May 2019 to 17 May 2019 7 July 2020 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination Switzerland United Nations UNSPA/HRC/45/9/Add.1https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f45%2f9%2fAdd.1&Lang=en
X AND Y v. Romania
X AND Y v. Romania ROU 19/04/2021 00:00:00 30/04/2021 16:08:47 Case Description: The case concerns the State s failure to fulfil its positive obligation to ensure respect for private live on account of the absence of a clear and foreseeable legal EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57459
X v. Norway
X v. Norway CCPR/C/115/D/2474/2014 Communication number s : 2474/2014 Author: X Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 115 Country Norway Submission date 28 Oct 2014 Date of decision 05 Nov 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCCPR/C/115/D/2474/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2018/en-US
XERO FLOR W POLSCE SP. Z O.O. v. Poland
XERO FLOR W POLSCE SP. Z O.O. v. Poland POL 07/08/2021 00:00:00 04/10/2021 09:59:18 Case Description: The case concerns the breach of the applicant company s right to a tribunal established by law due to the participation of judge M.M. in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58569
Yoon and Choi v. Republic of Korea
Yoon and Choi v. Republic of Korea CCPR/C/88/D/1321 1322/2004 Communication number s : 1322/2004 1321/2004 Author: Yeo Bum Yoon and Myung Jin Choi Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 88 Country Republic of Korea Submission date 18 Oct 2004 JUTBCCPR/C/88/D/1321-1322/2004https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1323/en-US
Z.A.H. v. Canada
Z.A.H. v. Canada CAT/C/61/D/687/2015 Communication number s : 687/2015 Author: Z.A.H. represented by counsel Rajwinder S. Bhambi Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 61 Country Canada Submission date 22 Jun 2015 Date of decision 11 Aug JUTBCAT/C/61/D/687/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2284/en-US